美国商业保险b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者CAR - t细胞治疗后的实际治疗模式和自付费用

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Mohammed Zuber, Shaimaa Elshafie, Shifa Taj, Lorenzo Villa Zapata
{"title":"美国商业保险b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者CAR - t细胞治疗后的实际治疗模式和自付费用","authors":"Mohammed Zuber, Shaimaa Elshafie, Shifa Taj, Lorenzo Villa Zapata","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CAR T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), yet treatment failure remains a major concern. Clinical trial data indicate relapse rates up to 50% within 6 months, but real-world evidence on salvage therapy patterns and financial burdens is limited. This study aims to assess the risk of CAR T failure risk, characterize subsequent therapeutic strategies, and quantify patient out-of-pocket (OOP) health care costs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan database (2017-2022), identifying adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) who received CAR-T therapy. Additional therapy post-index indicated relapse, with cumulative risk estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. OOP costs, including copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles, were calculated. Among 224 eligible patients (median age: 57 years, 70% male, 83% DLBCL), 85 (38%) initiated subsequent therapy, with a cumulative failure risk of 36% at 6 months and 48% at 12 months. Lenalidomide was the most common salvage therapy in DLBCL. Six-month total OOP costs distributed across 121 patients were $273,676, with outpatient claims comprising 67%. Patients requiring additional therapy had higher mean OOP costs ($3,221 versus $1,806), with some reaching $38,889. This study underscores the persistent need for effective salvage therapy options and the financial burden of treatment failure. As CAR T-cell therapy is increasingly utilized in earlier treatment lines, future research should focus on optimizing post-CAR T-cell management and mitigating financial toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Treatment Patterns and Out-of-Pocket Costs After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Commercially Insured Patients With B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Zuber, Shaimaa Elshafie, Shifa Taj, Lorenzo Villa Zapata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.06.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CAR T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), yet treatment failure remains a major concern. Clinical trial data indicate relapse rates up to 50% within 6 months, but real-world evidence on salvage therapy patterns and financial burdens is limited. This study aims to assess the risk of CAR T failure risk, characterize subsequent therapeutic strategies, and quantify patient out-of-pocket (OOP) health care costs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan database (2017-2022), identifying adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) who received CAR-T therapy. Additional therapy post-index indicated relapse, with cumulative risk estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. OOP costs, including copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles, were calculated. Among 224 eligible patients (median age: 57 years, 70% male, 83% DLBCL), 85 (38%) initiated subsequent therapy, with a cumulative failure risk of 36% at 6 months and 48% at 12 months. Lenalidomide was the most common salvage therapy in DLBCL. Six-month total OOP costs distributed across 121 patients were $273,676, with outpatient claims comprising 67%. Patients requiring additional therapy had higher mean OOP costs ($3,221 versus $1,806), with some reaching $38,889. This study underscores the persistent need for effective salvage therapy options and the financial burden of treatment failure. As CAR T-cell therapy is increasingly utilized in earlier treatment lines, future research should focus on optimizing post-CAR T-cell management and mitigating financial toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.06.018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.06.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:CAR - t细胞疗法已经改变了b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的治疗方式,但治疗失败仍然是一个主要问题。临床试验数据表明,六个月内复发率高达50%,但关于挽救治疗模式和经济负担的实际证据有限。本研究旨在评估CAR - T失败风险,描述后续治疗策略,并量化患者自付(OOP)医疗费用。方法:我们使用Merative MarketScan数据库(2017-2022)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,确定了接受CAR-T治疗的弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)、滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)、套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)或原发性纵隔大b细胞淋巴瘤(PMBCL)的成年患者。指数后的额外治疗表明复发,通过Kaplan-Meier分析估计累积风险。计算了包括共同支付、共同保险和免赔额在内的OOP成本。结果:在224例符合条件的患者中(中位年龄:57岁,70%男性,83% DLBCL), 85例(38%)开始后续治疗,6个月时累积失败风险为36%,12个月时累积失败风险为48%。来那度胺是DLBCL中最常见的挽救性治疗。121名患者六个月的总OOP费用为273,676美元,门诊索赔占67%。需要额外治疗的患者平均OOP费用较高(3,221美元对1,806美元),有些患者达到38,889美元。结论:本研究强调了持续需要有效的挽救性治疗方案和治疗失败的经济负担。随着CAR - t细胞疗法越来越多地用于早期治疗,未来的研究应侧重于优化CAR - t细胞治疗后的管理和减轻财务毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Treatment Patterns and Out-of-Pocket Costs After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Commercially Insured Patients With B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in the United States.

CAR T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), yet treatment failure remains a major concern. Clinical trial data indicate relapse rates up to 50% within 6 months, but real-world evidence on salvage therapy patterns and financial burdens is limited. This study aims to assess the risk of CAR T failure risk, characterize subsequent therapeutic strategies, and quantify patient out-of-pocket (OOP) health care costs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan database (2017-2022), identifying adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) who received CAR-T therapy. Additional therapy post-index indicated relapse, with cumulative risk estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis. OOP costs, including copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles, were calculated. Among 224 eligible patients (median age: 57 years, 70% male, 83% DLBCL), 85 (38%) initiated subsequent therapy, with a cumulative failure risk of 36% at 6 months and 48% at 12 months. Lenalidomide was the most common salvage therapy in DLBCL. Six-month total OOP costs distributed across 121 patients were $273,676, with outpatient claims comprising 67%. Patients requiring additional therapy had higher mean OOP costs ($3,221 versus $1,806), with some reaching $38,889. This study underscores the persistent need for effective salvage therapy options and the financial burden of treatment failure. As CAR T-cell therapy is increasingly utilized in earlier treatment lines, future research should focus on optimizing post-CAR T-cell management and mitigating financial toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信