{"title":"在急诊科提供HIV暴露前预防的随机对照试验(prep)。","authors":"Ethan Cowan, Erick Eiting, Clare O'Brien-Lambert, Jacqueline Ryder, Yvette Calderon","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV transmission. However, PrEP remains underutilized due to structural, provider, and individual-level barriers, with significant disparities in access. Emergency departments (EDs) serve high-risk populations often disconnected from primary care, offering a strategic setting for initiating PrEP services. In spite of the potential, ED-based PrEP programs face challenges, and the feasibility of initiating PrEP in this setting is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the impact of immediate PrEP initiation (iPrEP) in the ED on PrEP usage at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial randomized eligible ED patients 1:1 to iPrEP in the ED with a 28-day starter pack given at discharge vs. referral for outpatient PrEP initiation. Participants were followed for 90 days, with the primary outcome being PrEP usage. Secondary outcomes were PrEP usage at 30 and 60 days, retention in care at 30, 60, and 90 days, HIV risk, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1455 patients screened, 169 were eligible, 27 were randomized, and 26 received their assigned intervention. At 90 days, only 3 participants were taking PrEP (2 iPrEP, 1 referral). Follow-up at 30, 60, and 90 days revealed no significant differences between the groups for any secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP initiation in the ED did not improve PrEP usage or retention in care compared with referral alone. Despite high satisfaction with the screening process, barriers to ED-based PrEP initiation, including low interest and awareness, persisted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Controlled Trial of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Provision in the Emergency Department (PrEPPED).\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Cowan, Erick Eiting, Clare O'Brien-Lambert, Jacqueline Ryder, Yvette Calderon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV transmission. However, PrEP remains underutilized due to structural, provider, and individual-level barriers, with significant disparities in access. Emergency departments (EDs) serve high-risk populations often disconnected from primary care, offering a strategic setting for initiating PrEP services. In spite of the potential, ED-based PrEP programs face challenges, and the feasibility of initiating PrEP in this setting is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the impact of immediate PrEP initiation (iPrEP) in the ED on PrEP usage at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial randomized eligible ED patients 1:1 to iPrEP in the ED with a 28-day starter pack given at discharge vs. referral for outpatient PrEP initiation. Participants were followed for 90 days, with the primary outcome being PrEP usage. Secondary outcomes were PrEP usage at 30 and 60 days, retention in care at 30, 60, and 90 days, HIV risk, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1455 patients screened, 169 were eligible, 27 were randomized, and 26 received their assigned intervention. At 90 days, only 3 participants were taking PrEP (2 iPrEP, 1 referral). Follow-up at 30, 60, and 90 days revealed no significant differences between the groups for any secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP initiation in the ED did not improve PrEP usage or retention in care compared with referral alone. Despite high satisfaction with the screening process, barriers to ED-based PrEP initiation, including low interest and awareness, persisted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.03.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Randomized Controlled Trial of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Provision in the Emergency Department (PrEPPED).
Background: Oral human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV transmission. However, PrEP remains underutilized due to structural, provider, and individual-level barriers, with significant disparities in access. Emergency departments (EDs) serve high-risk populations often disconnected from primary care, offering a strategic setting for initiating PrEP services. In spite of the potential, ED-based PrEP programs face challenges, and the feasibility of initiating PrEP in this setting is unclear.
Objectives: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the impact of immediate PrEP initiation (iPrEP) in the ED on PrEP usage at 90 days.
Methods: The trial randomized eligible ED patients 1:1 to iPrEP in the ED with a 28-day starter pack given at discharge vs. referral for outpatient PrEP initiation. Participants were followed for 90 days, with the primary outcome being PrEP usage. Secondary outcomes were PrEP usage at 30 and 60 days, retention in care at 30, 60, and 90 days, HIV risk, and satisfaction.
Results: Of 1455 patients screened, 169 were eligible, 27 were randomized, and 26 received their assigned intervention. At 90 days, only 3 participants were taking PrEP (2 iPrEP, 1 referral). Follow-up at 30, 60, and 90 days revealed no significant differences between the groups for any secondary outcome.
Conclusions: PrEP initiation in the ED did not improve PrEP usage or retention in care compared with referral alone. Despite high satisfaction with the screening process, barriers to ED-based PrEP initiation, including low interest and awareness, persisted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections:
• Original Contributions
• Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN
• Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care
• Techniques and Procedures
• Technical Tips
• Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine
• Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine
• Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency
• Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine
• Medical Classics
• Emergency Forum
• Editorial(s)
• Letters to the Editor
• Education
• Administration of Emergency Medicine
• International Emergency Medicine
• Computers in Emergency Medicine
• Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention
• Ethics
• Humanities and Medicine
• American Academy of Emergency Medicine
• AAEM Medical Student Forum
• Book and Other Media Reviews
• Calendar of Events
• Abstracts
• Trauma Reports
• Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine