Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale, Htet Lin Htun, Alice J Owen, J R Baker, Irja Isaksen, Rosanne Freak-Poli
{"title":"与社区居住老年人生活安排相关的心血管疾病和全因死亡率的性别人群归因分数","authors":"Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale, Htet Lin Htun, Alice J Owen, J R Baker, Irja Isaksen, Rosanne Freak-Poli","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09648-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living alone poses significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risks. The population attributable fraction (PAF) quantifies the proportion of disease burden attributable to a specific risk factor. This study aims to estimate the PAF for CVD and all-cause mortality related to living completely alone. Additionally, the study examined the PAFs associated with not living with a partner/spouse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used longitudinal data from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and its sub-study, the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP), which included 5853 men and 6998 women. The participants were community-dwelling healthy adults aged 70 + years without CVD, dementia, or significant physical disabilities. Adjusting for social determinants and traditional risk factors, the gender-specific PAFs of CVD and all-cause mortality attributable to living completely alone and not living with a partner/spouse were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among women, 13.5% (95% CI: 6.3%, 22.4%) of CVD events could be attributed to living completely alone, and 14.1% (95% CI: 4.6%, 25.2%) to not living with a partner/spouse. For all-cause mortality in women, the corresponding PAFs were 9.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 16.6%) and 12.3% (95% CI: 5.8%, 20.8%), respectively. In contrast, among men, only the PAF between not living with a partner/spouse and all-cause mortality reached statistical significance (PAF = 6.0%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 10.2%). The remaining PAF estimates for CVD events and all-cause mortality were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed gender differences in CVD and all-cause mortality related to living alone highlight the need for tailored public health interventions to meet gender-specific needs for social connectedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-Specific Population Attributable Fractions for Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality Associated with Living Arrangement in Community-Dwelling Older People.\",\"authors\":\"Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale, Htet Lin Htun, Alice J Owen, J R Baker, Irja Isaksen, Rosanne Freak-Poli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09648-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living alone poses significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risks. The population attributable fraction (PAF) quantifies the proportion of disease burden attributable to a specific risk factor. This study aims to estimate the PAF for CVD and all-cause mortality related to living completely alone. Additionally, the study examined the PAFs associated with not living with a partner/spouse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used longitudinal data from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and its sub-study, the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP), which included 5853 men and 6998 women. The participants were community-dwelling healthy adults aged 70 + years without CVD, dementia, or significant physical disabilities. Adjusting for social determinants and traditional risk factors, the gender-specific PAFs of CVD and all-cause mortality attributable to living completely alone and not living with a partner/spouse were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among women, 13.5% (95% CI: 6.3%, 22.4%) of CVD events could be attributed to living completely alone, and 14.1% (95% CI: 4.6%, 25.2%) to not living with a partner/spouse. For all-cause mortality in women, the corresponding PAFs were 9.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 16.6%) and 12.3% (95% CI: 5.8%, 20.8%), respectively. In contrast, among men, only the PAF between not living with a partner/spouse and all-cause mortality reached statistical significance (PAF = 6.0%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 10.2%). The remaining PAF estimates for CVD events and all-cause mortality were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed gender differences in CVD and all-cause mortality related to living alone highlight the need for tailored public health interventions to meet gender-specific needs for social connectedness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09648-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09648-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender-Specific Population Attributable Fractions for Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality Associated with Living Arrangement in Community-Dwelling Older People.
Background: Living alone poses significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risks. The population attributable fraction (PAF) quantifies the proportion of disease burden attributable to a specific risk factor. This study aims to estimate the PAF for CVD and all-cause mortality related to living completely alone. Additionally, the study examined the PAFs associated with not living with a partner/spouse.
Methods: This study used longitudinal data from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study and its sub-study, the ASPREE Longitudinal Study of Older Persons (ALSOP), which included 5853 men and 6998 women. The participants were community-dwelling healthy adults aged 70 + years without CVD, dementia, or significant physical disabilities. Adjusting for social determinants and traditional risk factors, the gender-specific PAFs of CVD and all-cause mortality attributable to living completely alone and not living with a partner/spouse were determined.
Results: Among women, 13.5% (95% CI: 6.3%, 22.4%) of CVD events could be attributed to living completely alone, and 14.1% (95% CI: 4.6%, 25.2%) to not living with a partner/spouse. For all-cause mortality in women, the corresponding PAFs were 9.8% (95% CI: 3.7%, 16.6%) and 12.3% (95% CI: 5.8%, 20.8%), respectively. In contrast, among men, only the PAF between not living with a partner/spouse and all-cause mortality reached statistical significance (PAF = 6.0%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 10.2%). The remaining PAF estimates for CVD events and all-cause mortality were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The observed gender differences in CVD and all-cause mortality related to living alone highlight the need for tailored public health interventions to meet gender-specific needs for social connectedness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.