{"title":"心理困扰和肾衰竭作为头颈癌患者放化疗毒性和生活质量的预测因子。","authors":"Daniela Jicman Stan, Alin-Laurentiu Tatu, Alina-Maria Lescai, Corina Popazu, Adriana Liliana Vlad, Georgian Dobrea, Alexia Anastasia Ștefania Baltă","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13121476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Quality of life (QoL) in oncology patients is shaped by the interplay of biological, psychological and treatment-related factors. While prior studies have addressed the independent effects of treatment toxicity and psychological distress, little is known about the interaction between depressive-anxious disorders, kidney failure and haematological toxicity on QoL among patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. <b>Objective</b>: This study aims to examine the combined effect of haematological toxicity, depressive-anxious disorders and chronic renal disease on the total QLQ-H&N43 score, a validated measure of QoL in patients with head and neck cancer. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 93 patients were included in an observational study. PROCESS macro for SPSS was used to test the three-way interaction between haematological toxicity (X), depressive-anxious disorders (W) and kidney failure (Z) on QoL (Y). <b>Results</b>: The three-way interaction was statistically significant (β = 31.04, <i>p</i> = 0.032), accounting for 18.9% of the variance in QLQ-H&N43 scores (R² = 0.1888). Patients presenting both depressive-anxious disorders and renal comorbidities reported higher QoL scores, indicating poorer quality of life in the presence of severe treatment toxicity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Psychological distress and kidney failure may synergistically exacerbate the negative effects of chemoradiotherapy toxicity on quality of life. These findings underscore the need for integrated care models addressing both psychological vulnerability and medical comorbidities in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Distress and Kidney Failure as Predictors of Chemoradiotherapy Toxicity and Quality of Life in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Jicman Stan, Alin-Laurentiu Tatu, Alina-Maria Lescai, Corina Popazu, Adriana Liliana Vlad, Georgian Dobrea, Alexia Anastasia Ștefania Baltă\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13121476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Quality of life (QoL) in oncology patients is shaped by the interplay of biological, psychological and treatment-related factors. While prior studies have addressed the independent effects of treatment toxicity and psychological distress, little is known about the interaction between depressive-anxious disorders, kidney failure and haematological toxicity on QoL among patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. <b>Objective</b>: This study aims to examine the combined effect of haematological toxicity, depressive-anxious disorders and chronic renal disease on the total QLQ-H&N43 score, a validated measure of QoL in patients with head and neck cancer. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 93 patients were included in an observational study. PROCESS macro for SPSS was used to test the three-way interaction between haematological toxicity (X), depressive-anxious disorders (W) and kidney failure (Z) on QoL (Y). <b>Results</b>: The three-way interaction was statistically significant (β = 31.04, <i>p</i> = 0.032), accounting for 18.9% of the variance in QLQ-H&N43 scores (R² = 0.1888). Patients presenting both depressive-anxious disorders and renal comorbidities reported higher QoL scores, indicating poorer quality of life in the presence of severe treatment toxicity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Psychological distress and kidney failure may synergistically exacerbate the negative effects of chemoradiotherapy toxicity on quality of life. These findings underscore the need for integrated care models addressing both psychological vulnerability and medical comorbidities in oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192723/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121476\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肿瘤患者的生活质量(QoL)是由生物学、心理和治疗相关因素的相互作用形成的。虽然先前的研究已经解决了治疗毒性和心理困扰的独立影响,但对于接受放化疗的头颈癌患者中,抑郁-焦虑障碍、肾衰竭和血液学毒性之间的相互作用知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在探讨血液毒性、抑郁焦虑障碍和慢性肾脏疾病对头颈癌患者生活质量的有效衡量指标QLQ-H&N43总评分的联合影响。方法:对93例患者进行观察性研究。使用SPSS的PROCESS宏来检验血液学毒性(X)、抑郁焦虑障碍(W)和肾衰竭(Z)对生活质量(Y)的三向相互作用。结果:三者交互作用有统计学意义(β = 31.04, p = 0.032),占QLQ-H&N43评分方差的18.9% (R²= 0.1888)。同时出现抑郁焦虑障碍和肾脏合并症的患者报告的生活质量评分较高,表明在存在严重治疗毒性的情况下生活质量较差。结论:心理困扰和肾衰竭可能协同加剧放化疗毒性对生活质量的负面影响。这些发现强调需要综合护理模式解决心理脆弱性和医学合并症在肿瘤。
Psychological Distress and Kidney Failure as Predictors of Chemoradiotherapy Toxicity and Quality of Life in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.
Background: Quality of life (QoL) in oncology patients is shaped by the interplay of biological, psychological and treatment-related factors. While prior studies have addressed the independent effects of treatment toxicity and psychological distress, little is known about the interaction between depressive-anxious disorders, kidney failure and haematological toxicity on QoL among patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Objective: This study aims to examine the combined effect of haematological toxicity, depressive-anxious disorders and chronic renal disease on the total QLQ-H&N43 score, a validated measure of QoL in patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: A total of 93 patients were included in an observational study. PROCESS macro for SPSS was used to test the three-way interaction between haematological toxicity (X), depressive-anxious disorders (W) and kidney failure (Z) on QoL (Y). Results: The three-way interaction was statistically significant (β = 31.04, p = 0.032), accounting for 18.9% of the variance in QLQ-H&N43 scores (R² = 0.1888). Patients presenting both depressive-anxious disorders and renal comorbidities reported higher QoL scores, indicating poorer quality of life in the presence of severe treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Psychological distress and kidney failure may synergistically exacerbate the negative effects of chemoradiotherapy toxicity on quality of life. These findings underscore the need for integrated care models addressing both psychological vulnerability and medical comorbidities in oncology.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.