使用简单的统计方法增强医疗保健完整性:检测历史皮肤科服务支付中的违规行为。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Andrej F Plesničar, Nena Bagari Bizjak, Pika Jazbinšek
{"title":"使用简单的统计方法增强医疗保健完整性:检测历史皮肤科服务支付中的违规行为。","authors":"Andrej F Plesničar, Nena Bagari Bizjak, Pika Jazbinšek","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13121464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Healthcare payment systems face challenges such as fraud and overbilling, which often require costly and resource-intensive detection tools. In response, the utility of simple statistical tests was explored in this study as a practical alternative for identifying irregularities in dermatology service payments within the Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia (HIIS). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Ten-year-old anonymized billing data from 30 dermatology providers in Slovenia (with a population of 2 million) were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology while aiming to avoid reputational harm to current providers. The dataset from 2014 included variables such as the \"number of services charged\", \"total number of points charged\" (under Slovenia's point-based tariff system at the time), \"number of points per examination\", \"average examination values (EUR)\", \"number of first examinations\", and \"total number of first/follow-up examinations\". Data credibility was assessed using Benford's Law (for calculating χ<sup>2</sup> values and testing null hypothesis rejection at the 95% level), and Grubbs' test, Hampel's test, and T-test were used to identify outliers. <b>Results:</b> An analysis using Benford's Law revealed significant deviations for the \"number of services charged\" (<i>p</i> < 0.005), \"total number of points charged\" (<i>p</i> < 0.01), \"number of points per examination\" (<i>p</i> < 0.0005), and \"average examination values (EUR)\" (<i>p</i> < 0.005), suggesting anomalies. Conversely, data on the numbers of \"first\" (<i>p</i> < 0.7) and \"total first/follow-up examinations\" (<i>p</i> < 0.3) were found to align with Benford's Law, indicating authenticity. Outlier detection consistently identified two institutions with unusually high values for points per examination and average examination monetary value. <b>Conclusions:</b> Simple statistical tests can effectively identify potential irregularities in healthcare payment data, providing a cost-effective screening method for further investigation. Identifying outlier providers highlights areas needing detailed scrutiny to understand anomaly causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Healthcare Integrity Using Simple Statistical Methods: Detecting Irregularities in Historical Dermatology Services Payments.\",\"authors\":\"Andrej F Plesničar, Nena Bagari Bizjak, Pika Jazbinšek\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13121464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Healthcare payment systems face challenges such as fraud and overbilling, which often require costly and resource-intensive detection tools. In response, the utility of simple statistical tests was explored in this study as a practical alternative for identifying irregularities in dermatology service payments within the Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia (HIIS). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Ten-year-old anonymized billing data from 30 dermatology providers in Slovenia (with a population of 2 million) were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology while aiming to avoid reputational harm to current providers. The dataset from 2014 included variables such as the \\\"number of services charged\\\", \\\"total number of points charged\\\" (under Slovenia's point-based tariff system at the time), \\\"number of points per examination\\\", \\\"average examination values (EUR)\\\", \\\"number of first examinations\\\", and \\\"total number of first/follow-up examinations\\\". Data credibility was assessed using Benford's Law (for calculating χ<sup>2</sup> values and testing null hypothesis rejection at the 95% level), and Grubbs' test, Hampel's test, and T-test were used to identify outliers. <b>Results:</b> An analysis using Benford's Law revealed significant deviations for the \\\"number of services charged\\\" (<i>p</i> < 0.005), \\\"total number of points charged\\\" (<i>p</i> < 0.01), \\\"number of points per examination\\\" (<i>p</i> < 0.0005), and \\\"average examination values (EUR)\\\" (<i>p</i> < 0.005), suggesting anomalies. Conversely, data on the numbers of \\\"first\\\" (<i>p</i> < 0.7) and \\\"total first/follow-up examinations\\\" (<i>p</i> < 0.3) were found to align with Benford's Law, indicating authenticity. Outlier detection consistently identified two institutions with unusually high values for points per examination and average examination monetary value. <b>Conclusions:</b> Simple statistical tests can effectively identify potential irregularities in healthcare payment data, providing a cost-effective screening method for further investigation. Identifying outlier providers highlights areas needing detailed scrutiny to understand anomaly causes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:医疗保健支付系统面临欺诈和超额计费等挑战,这通常需要昂贵且资源密集的检测工具。为此,本研究探讨了简单统计检验的效用,作为确定斯洛文尼亚健康保险协会(HIIS)内皮肤科服务支付违规行为的实际替代办法。材料和方法:对斯洛文尼亚30家皮肤科医生(人口200万)10年前的匿名账单数据进行分析,以评估所提出方法的有效性,同时避免对现有医生的声誉造成损害。2014年的数据集包括诸如“收费服务数量”、“收费总点数”(在斯洛文尼亚当时基于点数的关税制度下)、“每次检查点数”、“平均检查值(欧元)”、“首次检查次数”和“首次/后续检查总数”等变量。采用本福德定律(Benford’s Law)评估数据可信度(用于计算χ2值并在95%水平上检验原假设拒绝),并使用Grubbs检验、Hampel检验和t检验识别异常值。结果:使用本福德定律进行的分析显示,“收费服务数量”(p < 0.005)、“收费总点数”(p < 0.01)、“每次检查点数”(p < 0.0005)和“平均检查值(欧元)”存在显著偏差。(p < 0.005),提示异常。相反,“第一次”(p < 0.7)和“总首次/随访检查”(p < 0.3)的数据与本福德定律一致,表明真实性。离群值检测一致地确定了两个机构的每次考试得分和平均考试货币价值异常高。结论:简单的统计检验可以有效识别医疗支付数据中潜在的违规行为,为进一步调查提供了一种具有成本效益的筛查方法。识别异常提供者突出了需要详细审查的领域,以了解异常原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Healthcare Integrity Using Simple Statistical Methods: Detecting Irregularities in Historical Dermatology Services Payments.

Background and Objectives: Healthcare payment systems face challenges such as fraud and overbilling, which often require costly and resource-intensive detection tools. In response, the utility of simple statistical tests was explored in this study as a practical alternative for identifying irregularities in dermatology service payments within the Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia (HIIS). Materials and Methods: Ten-year-old anonymized billing data from 30 dermatology providers in Slovenia (with a population of 2 million) were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology while aiming to avoid reputational harm to current providers. The dataset from 2014 included variables such as the "number of services charged", "total number of points charged" (under Slovenia's point-based tariff system at the time), "number of points per examination", "average examination values (EUR)", "number of first examinations", and "total number of first/follow-up examinations". Data credibility was assessed using Benford's Law (for calculating χ2 values and testing null hypothesis rejection at the 95% level), and Grubbs' test, Hampel's test, and T-test were used to identify outliers. Results: An analysis using Benford's Law revealed significant deviations for the "number of services charged" (p < 0.005), "total number of points charged" (p < 0.01), "number of points per examination" (p < 0.0005), and "average examination values (EUR)" (p < 0.005), suggesting anomalies. Conversely, data on the numbers of "first" (p < 0.7) and "total first/follow-up examinations" (p < 0.3) were found to align with Benford's Law, indicating authenticity. Outlier detection consistently identified two institutions with unusually high values for points per examination and average examination monetary value. Conclusions: Simple statistical tests can effectively identify potential irregularities in healthcare payment data, providing a cost-effective screening method for further investigation. Identifying outlier providers highlights areas needing detailed scrutiny to understand anomaly causes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信