在6个随机安慰剂对照的3期临床试验中,将多重植入纳入WOMAC疼痛CFB的Tanezumab剂量反应模型。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Martin Boucher, Scott Marshall, Puneet Gaitonde
{"title":"在6个随机安慰剂对照的3期临床试验中,将多重植入纳入WOMAC疼痛CFB的Tanezumab剂量反应模型。","authors":"Martin Boucher, Scott Marshall, Puneet Gaitonde","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple imputation is increasingly being used to deal with missing data in clinical trials. It is a simulation approach leading to multiple analyses of a pre-defined number of datasets. For a pre-defined statistical model, this is relatively straightforward, but for model development as typically conducted in Pharmacometrics, it is unclear how such an approach could be implemented. This case study describes how this was addressed at the time of a regulatory submission and considers alternative approaches which could be adopted in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating Multiple Imputation Into Tanezumab Dose-Response Modeling of WOMAC Pain CFB Across Six Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Boucher, Scott Marshall, Puneet Gaitonde\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.70070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multiple imputation is increasingly being used to deal with missing data in clinical trials. It is a simulation approach leading to multiple analyses of a pre-defined number of datasets. For a pre-defined statistical model, this is relatively straightforward, but for model development as typically conducted in Pharmacometrics, it is unclear how such an approach could be implemented. This case study describes how this was addressed at the time of a regulatory submission and considers alternative approaches which could be adopted in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70070\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床试验中,多重输入越来越多地用于处理缺失数据。它是一种模拟方法,可以对预定义数量的数据集进行多次分析。对于预定义的统计模型,这是相对简单的,但对于药物计量学中典型的模型开发,尚不清楚如何实现这种方法。本案例研究描述了在提交监管文件时如何解决这一问题,并考虑了未来可能采用的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating Multiple Imputation Into Tanezumab Dose-Response Modeling of WOMAC Pain CFB Across Six Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trials.

Multiple imputation is increasingly being used to deal with missing data in clinical trials. It is a simulation approach leading to multiple analyses of a pre-defined number of datasets. For a pre-defined statistical model, this is relatively straightforward, but for model development as typically conducted in Pharmacometrics, it is unclear how such an approach could be implemented. This case study describes how this was addressed at the time of a regulatory submission and considers alternative approaches which could be adopted in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信