Nora Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Laura E Edsberg
{"title":"急性护理医院压伤预防干预措施的应用","authors":"Nora Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Laura E Edsberg","doi":"10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant clinical concern, negatively impacting quality of life for patients and increasing health care costs. Abundant research highlights the critical importance of preventing PIs through nursing interventions. Despite decades of research and widespread use of evidence-based preventive strategies, PIs that develop during an inpatient stay, known as hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs), continue to represent a major challenge for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between nurses' adherence to PI prevention practices and HAPI development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PI data submitted to the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) from 1,379 acute care facilities were used to examine the prevalence of PIs and the use of preventive interventions in 355,031 high-risk patients. Utilization of four preventive interventions was determined for three groups of patients: those without PIs, those with superficial PIs (stages 1 and 2), and those with severe PIs (stages 3 and 4, unstageable, deep tissue pressure injury). Chi-square tests were calculated to identify significant differences in the utilization of preventive interventions among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,500 high-risk patients were found to have PIs for a HAPI prevalence rate of 3.8%. Among the four prevention interventions, pressure redistribution and moisture management were performed the most consistently-from 91.9% to 95.4%-across all three PI groups. Nutritional support and routine repositioning were performed the least frequently-from 78.6% to 90.4%-across all three PI groups. Overall, the highest utilization of preventive interventions was reported in patients with severe PIs and the lowest in patients with superficial PIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate consistent adherence to PI preventive practices for at-risk patients. Additionally, findings suggest that more consistent nutritional support and routine repositioning are areas for improvement in preventive practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7622,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing","volume":"125 7","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Pressure Injury Prevention Interventions in Acute Care Hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Nora Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Laura E Edsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant clinical concern, negatively impacting quality of life for patients and increasing health care costs. Abundant research highlights the critical importance of preventing PIs through nursing interventions. Despite decades of research and widespread use of evidence-based preventive strategies, PIs that develop during an inpatient stay, known as hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs), continue to represent a major challenge for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between nurses' adherence to PI prevention practices and HAPI development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PI data submitted to the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) from 1,379 acute care facilities were used to examine the prevalence of PIs and the use of preventive interventions in 355,031 high-risk patients. Utilization of four preventive interventions was determined for three groups of patients: those without PIs, those with superficial PIs (stages 1 and 2), and those with severe PIs (stages 3 and 4, unstageable, deep tissue pressure injury). Chi-square tests were calculated to identify significant differences in the utilization of preventive interventions among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,500 high-risk patients were found to have PIs for a HAPI prevalence rate of 3.8%. Among the four prevention interventions, pressure redistribution and moisture management were performed the most consistently-from 91.9% to 95.4%-across all three PI groups. Nutritional support and routine repositioning were performed the least frequently-from 78.6% to 90.4%-across all three PI groups. Overall, the highest utilization of preventive interventions was reported in patients with severe PIs and the lowest in patients with superficial PIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate consistent adherence to PI preventive practices for at-risk patients. Additionally, findings suggest that more consistent nutritional support and routine repositioning are areas for improvement in preventive practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"125 7\",\"pages\":\"38-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilization of Pressure Injury Prevention Interventions in Acute Care Hospitals.
Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant clinical concern, negatively impacting quality of life for patients and increasing health care costs. Abundant research highlights the critical importance of preventing PIs through nursing interventions. Despite decades of research and widespread use of evidence-based preventive strategies, PIs that develop during an inpatient stay, known as hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs), continue to represent a major challenge for clinical practice.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between nurses' adherence to PI prevention practices and HAPI development.
Methods: PI data submitted to the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) from 1,379 acute care facilities were used to examine the prevalence of PIs and the use of preventive interventions in 355,031 high-risk patients. Utilization of four preventive interventions was determined for three groups of patients: those without PIs, those with superficial PIs (stages 1 and 2), and those with severe PIs (stages 3 and 4, unstageable, deep tissue pressure injury). Chi-square tests were calculated to identify significant differences in the utilization of preventive interventions among the three groups.
Results: A total of 13,500 high-risk patients were found to have PIs for a HAPI prevalence rate of 3.8%. Among the four prevention interventions, pressure redistribution and moisture management were performed the most consistently-from 91.9% to 95.4%-across all three PI groups. Nutritional support and routine repositioning were performed the least frequently-from 78.6% to 90.4%-across all three PI groups. Overall, the highest utilization of preventive interventions was reported in patients with severe PIs and the lowest in patients with superficial PIs.
Conclusion: These findings demonstrate consistent adherence to PI preventive practices for at-risk patients. Additionally, findings suggest that more consistent nutritional support and routine repositioning are areas for improvement in preventive practices.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Nursing is the oldest and most honored broad-based nursing journal in the world. Peer reviewed and evidence-based, it is considered the profession’s premier journal. AJN adheres to journalistic standards that require transparency of real and potential conflicts of interests that authors,editors and reviewers may have. It follows publishing standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE; www.icmje.org), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME; www.wame.org), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org/).
AJN welcomes submissions of evidence-based clinical application papers and descriptions of best clinical practices, original research and QI reports, case studies, narratives, commentaries, and other manuscripts on a variety of clinical and professional topics. The journal also welcomes submissions for its various departments and columns, including artwork and poetry that is relevant to nursing or health care. Guidelines on writing for specific departments—Art of Nursing, Viewpoint, Policy and Politics, and Reflections—are available at http://AJN.edmgr.com.
AJN''s mission is to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, discussion of relevant and controversial professional issues, adherence to the standards of journalistic integrity and excellence, and promotion of nursing perspectives to the health care community and the public.