急性护理医院压伤预防干预措施的应用

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
American Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109
Nora Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Laura E Edsberg
{"title":"急性护理医院压伤预防干预措施的应用","authors":"Nora Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Laura E Edsberg","doi":"10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant clinical concern, negatively impacting quality of life for patients and increasing health care costs. Abundant research highlights the critical importance of preventing PIs through nursing interventions. Despite decades of research and widespread use of evidence-based preventive strategies, PIs that develop during an inpatient stay, known as hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs), continue to represent a major challenge for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between nurses' adherence to PI prevention practices and HAPI development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PI data submitted to the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) from 1,379 acute care facilities were used to examine the prevalence of PIs and the use of preventive interventions in 355,031 high-risk patients. Utilization of four preventive interventions was determined for three groups of patients: those without PIs, those with superficial PIs (stages 1 and 2), and those with severe PIs (stages 3 and 4, unstageable, deep tissue pressure injury). Chi-square tests were calculated to identify significant differences in the utilization of preventive interventions among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,500 high-risk patients were found to have PIs for a HAPI prevalence rate of 3.8%. Among the four prevention interventions, pressure redistribution and moisture management were performed the most consistently-from 91.9% to 95.4%-across all three PI groups. Nutritional support and routine repositioning were performed the least frequently-from 78.6% to 90.4%-across all three PI groups. Overall, the highest utilization of preventive interventions was reported in patients with severe PIs and the lowest in patients with superficial PIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate consistent adherence to PI preventive practices for at-risk patients. Additionally, findings suggest that more consistent nutritional support and routine repositioning are areas for improvement in preventive practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7622,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing","volume":"125 7","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Pressure Injury Prevention Interventions in Acute Care Hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Nora Warshawsky, Angela Pascale, Jill Cox, Virginia Capasso, Laura E Edsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant clinical concern, negatively impacting quality of life for patients and increasing health care costs. Abundant research highlights the critical importance of preventing PIs through nursing interventions. Despite decades of research and widespread use of evidence-based preventive strategies, PIs that develop during an inpatient stay, known as hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs), continue to represent a major challenge for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between nurses' adherence to PI prevention practices and HAPI development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PI data submitted to the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) from 1,379 acute care facilities were used to examine the prevalence of PIs and the use of preventive interventions in 355,031 high-risk patients. Utilization of four preventive interventions was determined for three groups of patients: those without PIs, those with superficial PIs (stages 1 and 2), and those with severe PIs (stages 3 and 4, unstageable, deep tissue pressure injury). Chi-square tests were calculated to identify significant differences in the utilization of preventive interventions among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,500 high-risk patients were found to have PIs for a HAPI prevalence rate of 3.8%. Among the four prevention interventions, pressure redistribution and moisture management were performed the most consistently-from 91.9% to 95.4%-across all three PI groups. Nutritional support and routine repositioning were performed the least frequently-from 78.6% to 90.4%-across all three PI groups. Overall, the highest utilization of preventive interventions was reported in patients with severe PIs and the lowest in patients with superficial PIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate consistent adherence to PI preventive practices for at-risk patients. Additionally, findings suggest that more consistent nutritional support and routine repositioning are areas for improvement in preventive practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"volume\":\"125 7\",\"pages\":\"38-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:压伤(PIs)仍然是一个重要的临床问题,对患者的生活质量产生负面影响,并增加医疗保健费用。大量的研究强调了通过护理干预预防pi的重要性。尽管经过数十年的研究和基于证据的预防策略的广泛使用,在住院期间形成的pi,即医院获得性压力损伤(HAPIs),仍然是临床实践的主要挑战。目的:本研究的目的是探讨护士遵守PI预防实践与HAPI发展之间的关系。方法:利用1,379家急症护理机构提交至2022年国家护理质量指标数据库(NDNQI)的PI数据,对355,031名高危患者的PI患病率和预防干预措施的使用情况进行调查。对三组患者确定了四种预防干预措施的使用:无PIs患者、浅表PIs患者(1期和2期)和严重PIs患者(3期和4期,不可分期,深部组织压力损伤)。计算卡方检验以确定三组之间预防干预措施的使用有显著差异。结果:共有13500例高危患者存在pi, HAPI患病率为3.8%。在四种预防干预措施中,压力再分配和水分管理在所有三个PI组中执行的一致性最高,从91.9%到95.4%。在所有三个PI组中,营养支持和常规重新定位的频率最低,从78.6%降至90.4%。总体而言,预防干预措施的使用率在严重pi患者中最高,在浅表pi患者中最低。结论:这些发现证明了高危患者一贯坚持PI预防措施。此外,研究结果表明,更一致的营养支持和常规重新定位是预防措施有待改进的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of Pressure Injury Prevention Interventions in Acute Care Hospitals.

Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) remain a significant clinical concern, negatively impacting quality of life for patients and increasing health care costs. Abundant research highlights the critical importance of preventing PIs through nursing interventions. Despite decades of research and widespread use of evidence-based preventive strategies, PIs that develop during an inpatient stay, known as hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs), continue to represent a major challenge for clinical practice.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between nurses' adherence to PI prevention practices and HAPI development.

Methods: PI data submitted to the 2022 National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) from 1,379 acute care facilities were used to examine the prevalence of PIs and the use of preventive interventions in 355,031 high-risk patients. Utilization of four preventive interventions was determined for three groups of patients: those without PIs, those with superficial PIs (stages 1 and 2), and those with severe PIs (stages 3 and 4, unstageable, deep tissue pressure injury). Chi-square tests were calculated to identify significant differences in the utilization of preventive interventions among the three groups.

Results: A total of 13,500 high-risk patients were found to have PIs for a HAPI prevalence rate of 3.8%. Among the four prevention interventions, pressure redistribution and moisture management were performed the most consistently-from 91.9% to 95.4%-across all three PI groups. Nutritional support and routine repositioning were performed the least frequently-from 78.6% to 90.4%-across all three PI groups. Overall, the highest utilization of preventive interventions was reported in patients with severe PIs and the lowest in patients with superficial PIs.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate consistent adherence to PI preventive practices for at-risk patients. Additionally, findings suggest that more consistent nutritional support and routine repositioning are areas for improvement in preventive practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
604
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Nursing is the oldest and most honored broad-based nursing journal in the world. Peer reviewed and evidence-based, it is considered the profession’s premier journal. AJN adheres to journalistic standards that require transparency of real and potential conflicts of interests that authors,editors and reviewers may have. It follows publishing standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE; www.icmje.org), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME; www.wame.org), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; http://publicationethics.org/). AJN welcomes submissions of evidence-based clinical application papers and descriptions of best clinical practices, original research and QI reports, case studies, narratives, commentaries, and other manuscripts on a variety of clinical and professional topics. The journal also welcomes submissions for its various departments and columns, including artwork and poetry that is relevant to nursing or health care. Guidelines on writing for specific departments—Art of Nursing, Viewpoint, Policy and Politics, and Reflections—are available at http://AJN.edmgr.com. AJN''s mission is to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, discussion of relevant and controversial professional issues, adherence to the standards of journalistic integrity and excellence, and promotion of nursing perspectives to the health care community and the public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信