开发幼发拉底河流域沉积物浓度预测,t rkiye,与蜜獾和浣熊优化为基础的混合算法。

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mohsen Saroughi, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Veysi Kartal, Oguz Simsek, Huseyin Cagan Kilinc, Chaitanya Baliram Pande
{"title":"开发幼发拉底河流域沉积物浓度预测,t<s:1> rkiye,与蜜獾和浣熊优化为基础的混合算法。","authors":"Mohsen Saroughi,&nbsp;Okan Mert Katipoğlu,&nbsp;Veysi Kartal,&nbsp;Oguz Simsek,&nbsp;Huseyin Cagan Kilinc,&nbsp;Chaitanya Baliram Pande","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14230-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Estimation of sediment concentration (SC) is of vital importance in terms of siltation and economic life of dams, lakes and aqueducts, reservoir operations, design of water resource structures, monitoring and control of water pollution, and flood management. Direct measurement of SC is a challenging and expensive task. For these reasons, it was used to estimate the SC values at a station in the Euphrates River. New hybrid models were established by combining the CatBoost regressor (CBR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models with the honey badger optimization algorithm (HBA) and coati optimization algorithm (COA). The performance of the new model was compared with stand-alone model of ANN and CBR, and their accuracy was evaluated. In the setup of the models, 4 different input combinations of lagged sediment and discharge values for up to 3 months were evaluated. It is noteworthy that as the number of input variables, i.e., lagged data input, increases, the prediction accuracy of the models generally increases. HBA and COA algorithms often improve the accuracy of sediment prediction by optimizing the parameters of the single machine learning model. In addition, according to the AIC performance metric, the HBA algorithm is generally slightly better capable of optimization than the COA. The best model outputs were obtained according to the HBA-CBR hybrid approach of scenario 4 (RMSE = 59.78, AIC = 785.03, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.32, PBIAS = 0.016, SI = 0.48, and MBE =  − 2.05 in test phase), which consists of discharge and sediment with a delay of up to 3 months. The results of the study are valuable for decision-makers and planners in terms of practical reservoir and flood management and protection of coasts and river beds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing sediment concentration prediction in the Euphrates River catchment, Türkiye, with a honey badger and coati optimization-based hybrid algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Saroughi,&nbsp;Okan Mert Katipoğlu,&nbsp;Veysi Kartal,&nbsp;Oguz Simsek,&nbsp;Huseyin Cagan Kilinc,&nbsp;Chaitanya Baliram Pande\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-025-14230-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Estimation of sediment concentration (SC) is of vital importance in terms of siltation and economic life of dams, lakes and aqueducts, reservoir operations, design of water resource structures, monitoring and control of water pollution, and flood management. Direct measurement of SC is a challenging and expensive task. For these reasons, it was used to estimate the SC values at a station in the Euphrates River. New hybrid models were established by combining the CatBoost regressor (CBR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models with the honey badger optimization algorithm (HBA) and coati optimization algorithm (COA). The performance of the new model was compared with stand-alone model of ANN and CBR, and their accuracy was evaluated. In the setup of the models, 4 different input combinations of lagged sediment and discharge values for up to 3 months were evaluated. It is noteworthy that as the number of input variables, i.e., lagged data input, increases, the prediction accuracy of the models generally increases. HBA and COA algorithms often improve the accuracy of sediment prediction by optimizing the parameters of the single machine learning model. In addition, according to the AIC performance metric, the HBA algorithm is generally slightly better capable of optimization than the COA. The best model outputs were obtained according to the HBA-CBR hybrid approach of scenario 4 (RMSE = 59.78, AIC = 785.03, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.32, PBIAS = 0.016, SI = 0.48, and MBE =  − 2.05 in test phase), which consists of discharge and sediment with a delay of up to 3 months. The results of the study are valuable for decision-makers and planners in terms of practical reservoir and flood management and protection of coasts and river beds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14230-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14230-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

泥沙浓度估算在水坝、湖泊和渡槽的淤积和经济寿命、水库运行、水资源结构设计、水污染监测和控制以及洪水管理等方面都具有重要意义。直接测量SC是一项具有挑战性和昂贵的任务。基于这些原因,我们用它来估算幼发拉底河某站点的SC值。将CatBoost回归量(CBR)和人工神经网络(ANN)模型与蜜獾优化算法(HBA)和浣熊优化算法(COA)相结合,建立了新的混合模型。将新模型的性能与人工神经网络和CBR的独立模型进行了比较,并对其精度进行了评价。在模型的建立中,评估了4种不同的滞后输沙量和3个月的滞后输沙量的输入组合。值得注意的是,随着输入变量(即滞后数据输入)的增加,模型的预测精度一般会提高。HBA和COA算法通常通过优化单个机器学习模型的参数来提高沉积物预测的准确性。此外,根据AIC性能指标,HBA算法的优化能力通常略好于COA。以情景4的HBA-CBR混合方法(RMSE = 59.78, AIC = 785.03, R2 = 0.32, PBIAS = 0.016, SI = 0.48, MBE = - 2.05)获得最佳模型输出,该模型由流量和泥沙组成,延迟时间长达3个月。研究结果对水库和洪水的实际管理以及海岸和河床的保护具有重要的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing sediment concentration prediction in the Euphrates River catchment, Türkiye, with a honey badger and coati optimization-based hybrid algorithm

Developing sediment concentration prediction in the Euphrates River catchment, Türkiye, with a honey badger and coati optimization-based hybrid algorithm

Estimation of sediment concentration (SC) is of vital importance in terms of siltation and economic life of dams, lakes and aqueducts, reservoir operations, design of water resource structures, monitoring and control of water pollution, and flood management. Direct measurement of SC is a challenging and expensive task. For these reasons, it was used to estimate the SC values at a station in the Euphrates River. New hybrid models were established by combining the CatBoost regressor (CBR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models with the honey badger optimization algorithm (HBA) and coati optimization algorithm (COA). The performance of the new model was compared with stand-alone model of ANN and CBR, and their accuracy was evaluated. In the setup of the models, 4 different input combinations of lagged sediment and discharge values for up to 3 months were evaluated. It is noteworthy that as the number of input variables, i.e., lagged data input, increases, the prediction accuracy of the models generally increases. HBA and COA algorithms often improve the accuracy of sediment prediction by optimizing the parameters of the single machine learning model. In addition, according to the AIC performance metric, the HBA algorithm is generally slightly better capable of optimization than the COA. The best model outputs were obtained according to the HBA-CBR hybrid approach of scenario 4 (RMSE = 59.78, AIC = 785.03, R2 = 0.32, PBIAS = 0.016, SI = 0.48, and MBE =  − 2.05 in test phase), which consists of discharge and sediment with a delay of up to 3 months. The results of the study are valuable for decision-makers and planners in terms of practical reservoir and flood management and protection of coasts and river beds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信