{"title":"一项多中心随机对照试验:多方面的方法可以改善与HCV治疗的联系","authors":"Peng Xu, Dandan Yang, Yan Guo, Jiejun Yu, Wanyue Zhang, Xiaobin Zhang, Chuanwu Sun, Xingyun Chen, Peidong Zhang, Zhongfu Liu, Jian Li","doi":"10.1111/liv.70200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rate was low in China. We aimed to evaluate a four-support approach in linking previous HCV RNA-positive patients to antiviral treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a randomised controlled trial (ChiCTR2200060858, https://www.chictr.org.cn) and selected HCV RNA-positive participants from previous HCV antibody/RNA-positive patients, and assigned them into intervention or control arm. The control arm received routine care, whereas intervention arm received additional four-support intervention, including simplified treatment delivery, minimal examinations, insurance assistance, and social supports. The primary outcome was proportion of treatment initiation. The secondary outcomes included sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, time-to-treatment initiation, treatment completion, and treatment willingness. Adverse events were recorded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result</h3>\n \n <p>Among 394 participants, 199 and 195 were in the four-support and control arms, respectively. The four-support arm had significant higher proportions of treatment initiation than control arm at 1 and 2 months (35.68% vs. 13.85% and 47.24% vs. 17.44%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.05). SVR was confirmed in 74.47% of four-support arm compared with 61.76% of control arm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.06). Patients in four-support arm had a shorter time-to-treatment initiation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.10) and more frequent treatment completion (aOR 4.13) than control arm. The cumulative probability of treatment initiation at 1 and 2 months had a significant difference between two arms. Only one adverse event occurred in four-support arm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The four-support intervention could improve both antiviral treatment initiation and SVR in HCV RNA-positive patients with a previous HCV antibody/RNA-positive result and could be applied in these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"45 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multifaceted Approach Leads to Improved Linkage to HCV Therapy: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Peng Xu, Dandan Yang, Yan Guo, Jiejun Yu, Wanyue Zhang, Xiaobin Zhang, Chuanwu Sun, Xingyun Chen, Peidong Zhang, Zhongfu Liu, Jian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/liv.70200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rate was low in China. We aimed to evaluate a four-support approach in linking previous HCV RNA-positive patients to antiviral treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a randomised controlled trial (ChiCTR2200060858, https://www.chictr.org.cn) and selected HCV RNA-positive participants from previous HCV antibody/RNA-positive patients, and assigned them into intervention or control arm. The control arm received routine care, whereas intervention arm received additional four-support intervention, including simplified treatment delivery, minimal examinations, insurance assistance, and social supports. The primary outcome was proportion of treatment initiation. The secondary outcomes included sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, time-to-treatment initiation, treatment completion, and treatment willingness. Adverse events were recorded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Result</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 394 participants, 199 and 195 were in the four-support and control arms, respectively. The four-support arm had significant higher proportions of treatment initiation than control arm at 1 and 2 months (35.68% vs. 13.85% and 47.24% vs. 17.44%, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.05). SVR was confirmed in 74.47% of four-support arm compared with 61.76% of control arm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.06). Patients in four-support arm had a shorter time-to-treatment initiation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.10) and more frequent treatment completion (aOR 4.13) than control arm. The cumulative probability of treatment initiation at 1 and 2 months had a significant difference between two arms. Only one adverse event occurred in four-support arm.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The four-support intervention could improve both antiviral treatment initiation and SVR in HCV RNA-positive patients with a previous HCV antibody/RNA-positive result and could be applied in these patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver International\",\"volume\":\"45 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)在中国的治愈率较低。我们的目的是评估一种四支持方法,将先前的HCV rna阳性患者与抗病毒治疗联系起来。方法采用随机对照试验(ChiCTR2200060858, https://www.chictr.org.cn),从既往HCV抗体/ rna阳性患者中选择HCV rna阳性受试者,并将其分为干预组或对照组。对照组接受常规护理,而干预组接受额外的四项支持干预,包括简化治疗交付、最低限度检查、保险援助和社会支持。主要终点是开始治疗的比例。次要结局包括持续病毒学反应(SVR)率、开始治疗时间、治疗完成度和治疗意愿。记录不良事件。结果394名被试中,四支持组199人,对照组195人。四支持组在1个月和2个月开始治疗的比例显著高于对照组(分别为35.68% vs. 13.85%和47.24% vs. 17.44%, p < 0.05)。四支持组的SVR为74.47%,对照组为61.76%(校正优势比[aOR] 2.06)。与对照组相比,四支撑组患者开始治疗的时间更短(校正风险比[aHR] 3.10),完成治疗的频率更高(aOR 4.13)。1个月和2个月开始治疗的累积概率在两组之间有显著差异。在四支支架组中仅发生一例不良事件。结论四支持干预可提高HCV抗体/ rna阳性的HCV rna阳性患者抗病毒治疗的起始时间和SVR,可应用于HCV rna阳性患者。
A Multifaceted Approach Leads to Improved Linkage to HCV Therapy: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial
Aim
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment rate was low in China. We aimed to evaluate a four-support approach in linking previous HCV RNA-positive patients to antiviral treatment.
Methods
We performed a randomised controlled trial (ChiCTR2200060858, https://www.chictr.org.cn) and selected HCV RNA-positive participants from previous HCV antibody/RNA-positive patients, and assigned them into intervention or control arm. The control arm received routine care, whereas intervention arm received additional four-support intervention, including simplified treatment delivery, minimal examinations, insurance assistance, and social supports. The primary outcome was proportion of treatment initiation. The secondary outcomes included sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, time-to-treatment initiation, treatment completion, and treatment willingness. Adverse events were recorded.
Result
Among 394 participants, 199 and 195 were in the four-support and control arms, respectively. The four-support arm had significant higher proportions of treatment initiation than control arm at 1 and 2 months (35.68% vs. 13.85% and 47.24% vs. 17.44%, respectively, p < 0.05). SVR was confirmed in 74.47% of four-support arm compared with 61.76% of control arm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.06). Patients in four-support arm had a shorter time-to-treatment initiation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.10) and more frequent treatment completion (aOR 4.13) than control arm. The cumulative probability of treatment initiation at 1 and 2 months had a significant difference between two arms. Only one adverse event occurred in four-support arm.
Conclusion
The four-support intervention could improve both antiviral treatment initiation and SVR in HCV RNA-positive patients with a previous HCV antibody/RNA-positive result and could be applied in these patients.
期刊介绍:
Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.