实施新的世卫组织艾滋病毒接触后预防指南:来自五个非洲国家的观点

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Sarah Magni, Daniel Byamukama, Maryam Sani Haske, Jane Mukami, Idah Moyo, Judith D. Auerbach
{"title":"实施新的世卫组织艾滋病毒接触后预防指南:来自五个非洲国家的观点","authors":"Sarah Magni,&nbsp;Daniel Byamukama,&nbsp;Maryam Sani Haske,&nbsp;Jane Mukami,&nbsp;Idah Moyo,&nbsp;Judith D. Auerbach","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an important component of comprehensive HIV prevention, yet its uptake has been suboptimal globally. In July 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its global guidance on PEP to include two new recommendations intended to increase timely access to and delivery of PEP. These recommendations specifically aim to expand both <i>where</i> PEP can be delivered, to include community settings, and <i>who</i> can provide PEP, to include community health workers and task-sharing. The practical realities of adopting new public health guidelines to achieve the intended benefits in most contexts are complex. Articulating these realities is important for identifying what will be required to ensure the feasibility of expanded PEP access in community settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>We provide stakeholder perspectives from five African countries—Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe—on both barriers to and strategies for implementing the new WHO PEP recommendations. These perspectives are informed by experiences in these countries that were shared at a recent workshop and highlight key themes related to PEP uptake and use: awareness and acceptability; administration and monitoring; policy alignment, including regulatory considerations; logistics; integration of services; stakeholder involvement and capacity building; and linking PEP and PrEP more directly. Running across these themes are the roles of socio-cultural norms and the need for increased resources to pay for implementing the recommendations, including capacity strengthening and monitoring in communities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While significant challenges exist to expanding PEP access in community settings and through task-sharing, there are examples from our countries of successful efforts to mitigate them by leveraging existing community resources and capacities in innovative ways. Additional efforts will require engagement across multiple stakeholders to address remaining awareness gaps, logistical and regulatory obstacles, and political will. As countries work to update their guidelines and align with the new WHO recommendations, continued collaboration and innovation within and across countries will be essential to realize the full potential of PEP in comprehensive HIV prevention efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"28 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26447","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the new WHO guidelines on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis: perspectives from five African countries\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Magni,&nbsp;Daniel Byamukama,&nbsp;Maryam Sani Haske,&nbsp;Jane Mukami,&nbsp;Idah Moyo,&nbsp;Judith D. Auerbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jia2.26447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an important component of comprehensive HIV prevention, yet its uptake has been suboptimal globally. In July 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its global guidance on PEP to include two new recommendations intended to increase timely access to and delivery of PEP. These recommendations specifically aim to expand both <i>where</i> PEP can be delivered, to include community settings, and <i>who</i> can provide PEP, to include community health workers and task-sharing. The practical realities of adopting new public health guidelines to achieve the intended benefits in most contexts are complex. Articulating these realities is important for identifying what will be required to ensure the feasibility of expanded PEP access in community settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We provide stakeholder perspectives from five African countries—Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe—on both barriers to and strategies for implementing the new WHO PEP recommendations. These perspectives are informed by experiences in these countries that were shared at a recent workshop and highlight key themes related to PEP uptake and use: awareness and acceptability; administration and monitoring; policy alignment, including regulatory considerations; logistics; integration of services; stakeholder involvement and capacity building; and linking PEP and PrEP more directly. Running across these themes are the roles of socio-cultural norms and the need for increased resources to pay for implementing the recommendations, including capacity strengthening and monitoring in communities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>While significant challenges exist to expanding PEP access in community settings and through task-sharing, there are examples from our countries of successful efforts to mitigate them by leveraging existing community resources and capacities in innovative ways. Additional efforts will require engagement across multiple stakeholders to address remaining awareness gaps, logistical and regulatory obstacles, and political will. As countries work to update their guidelines and align with the new WHO recommendations, continued collaboration and innovation within and across countries will be essential to realize the full potential of PEP in comprehensive HIV prevention efforts.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"volume\":\"28 S1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26447\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26447\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26447","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴露后预防(PEP)是艾滋病毒综合预防的重要组成部分,但其在全球范围内的应用并不理想。2024年7月,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)更新了其关于PEP的全球指南,其中包括两项旨在增加及时获得和提供PEP的新建议。这些建议的具体目标是扩大在哪里可以提供PEP,以包括社区环境,以及谁可以提供PEP,以包括社区卫生工作者和任务分担。在大多数情况下,采用新的公共卫生准则以实现预期效益的实际情况是复杂的。阐明这些现实对于确定为确保在社区环境中扩大个人教育机会的可行性需要做些什么是重要的。我们提供来自肯尼亚、尼日利亚、南非、乌干达和津巴布韦五个非洲国家的利益攸关方观点,讨论实施世卫组织PEP新建议的障碍和战略。这些观点是根据这些国家在最近的一次讲习班上分享的经验得出的,并突出了与PEP的吸收和使用有关的关键主题:认识和接受;管理和监测;政策一致性,包括监管方面的考虑;物流;服务集成;利益相关者参与和能力建设;将PEP和PrEP更直接地联系起来。贯穿这些主题的是社会文化规范的作用,以及需要增加资源来支付执行建议的费用,包括加强社区的能力和监测。结论:虽然在社区环境中通过任务分担扩大PEP获取存在重大挑战,但我们这些国家有一些成功的例子,通过创新方式利用现有社区资源和能力来缓解这些挑战。进一步的努力将需要多个利益攸关方的参与,以解决仍然存在的认识差距、后勤和监管障碍以及政治意愿。随着各国努力更新其指导方针并与世卫组织的新建议保持一致,在国家内部和国家之间继续开展合作和创新,对于充分发挥PEP在全面预防艾滋病毒工作中的潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing the new WHO guidelines on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis: perspectives from five African countries

Introduction

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an important component of comprehensive HIV prevention, yet its uptake has been suboptimal globally. In July 2024, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its global guidance on PEP to include two new recommendations intended to increase timely access to and delivery of PEP. These recommendations specifically aim to expand both where PEP can be delivered, to include community settings, and who can provide PEP, to include community health workers and task-sharing. The practical realities of adopting new public health guidelines to achieve the intended benefits in most contexts are complex. Articulating these realities is important for identifying what will be required to ensure the feasibility of expanded PEP access in community settings.

Discussion

We provide stakeholder perspectives from five African countries—Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe—on both barriers to and strategies for implementing the new WHO PEP recommendations. These perspectives are informed by experiences in these countries that were shared at a recent workshop and highlight key themes related to PEP uptake and use: awareness and acceptability; administration and monitoring; policy alignment, including regulatory considerations; logistics; integration of services; stakeholder involvement and capacity building; and linking PEP and PrEP more directly. Running across these themes are the roles of socio-cultural norms and the need for increased resources to pay for implementing the recommendations, including capacity strengthening and monitoring in communities.

Conclusions

While significant challenges exist to expanding PEP access in community settings and through task-sharing, there are examples from our countries of successful efforts to mitigate them by leveraging existing community resources and capacities in innovative ways. Additional efforts will require engagement across multiple stakeholders to address remaining awareness gaps, logistical and regulatory obstacles, and political will. As countries work to update their guidelines and align with the new WHO recommendations, continued collaboration and innovation within and across countries will be essential to realize the full potential of PEP in comprehensive HIV prevention efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信