安全少年司法环境中的教育发展:国际研究合作中的利益、挑战和权力动态

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Adeela ahmed Shafi, Tristan Middleton
{"title":"安全少年司法环境中的教育发展:国际研究合作中的利益、挑战和权力动态","authors":"Adeela ahmed Shafi,&nbsp;Tristan Middleton","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>International research collaborations (IRCs) can play a significant role in shaping educational development, particularly in youth justice settings. This study explores the benefits, challenges, and structural inequalities within IRCs focused on education for justice-involved children and young people. Drawing on qualitative data from participants from three Erasmus+ -funded projects across multiple European countries, the findings highlight how IRCs enable the exchange of knowledge, the adaptation of educational practices, and the development of more inclusive policies. However, persistent structural inequalities shape the dynamics of these collaborations. Participants from lower-income countries were more aware of hierarchical power relations, reinforcing existing critiques of global North-South imbalances where similar patterns were observed within European partnerships. Leadership roles, funding, and research methodologies were influenced by perceived credibility of established institutions and economic disparities, impacting on equitable participation. Methodological challenges, including language barriers, ethical considerations, and variations in data collection processes, also shaped the consistency and effectiveness of these collaborations. Despite these challenges, the study demonstrates that IRCs have the potential to foster meaningful learning and innovation when equity is embedded in collaborative frameworks. The research highlights the need for more equitable funding mechanisms, leadership development initiatives, and methodological strategies that prioritise inclusion. By critically examining the complexities of international research in youth justice education, this paper contributes to broader discussions on how IRCs can be more effective, even in the most constrained of research contexts. The findings have direct implications for policymakers, funding bodies, and practitioners seeking to strengthen the role of international collaboration in educational research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 103346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational development in secure juvenile justice settings: The benefits, the challenges and power dynamics in international research collaborations\",\"authors\":\"Adeela ahmed Shafi,&nbsp;Tristan Middleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>International research collaborations (IRCs) can play a significant role in shaping educational development, particularly in youth justice settings. This study explores the benefits, challenges, and structural inequalities within IRCs focused on education for justice-involved children and young people. Drawing on qualitative data from participants from three Erasmus+ -funded projects across multiple European countries, the findings highlight how IRCs enable the exchange of knowledge, the adaptation of educational practices, and the development of more inclusive policies. However, persistent structural inequalities shape the dynamics of these collaborations. Participants from lower-income countries were more aware of hierarchical power relations, reinforcing existing critiques of global North-South imbalances where similar patterns were observed within European partnerships. Leadership roles, funding, and research methodologies were influenced by perceived credibility of established institutions and economic disparities, impacting on equitable participation. Methodological challenges, including language barriers, ethical considerations, and variations in data collection processes, also shaped the consistency and effectiveness of these collaborations. Despite these challenges, the study demonstrates that IRCs have the potential to foster meaningful learning and innovation when equity is embedded in collaborative frameworks. The research highlights the need for more equitable funding mechanisms, leadership development initiatives, and methodological strategies that prioritise inclusion. By critically examining the complexities of international research in youth justice education, this paper contributes to broader discussions on how IRCs can be more effective, even in the most constrained of research contexts. The findings have direct implications for policymakers, funding bodies, and practitioners seeking to strengthen the role of international collaboration in educational research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325001440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325001440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际研究合作(IRCs)可以在塑造教育发展方面发挥重要作用,特别是在青年司法环境中。本研究探讨了以参与司法的儿童和青少年教育为重点的国际援助中心的利益、挑战和结构性不平等。研究结果利用了来自多个欧洲国家伊拉斯谟+ 资助的三个项目参与者的定性数据,强调了IRCs如何促进知识交流、适应教育实践和制定更具包容性的政策。然而,持续存在的结构性不平等影响了这些合作的动态。来自低收入国家的与会者更了解等级权力关系,加强了对全球南北不平衡的现有批评,在欧洲伙伴关系中也观察到类似的模式。领导角色、资助和研究方法受到已建立机构的可信度和经济差距的影响,从而影响公平参与。方法上的挑战,包括语言障碍、伦理考虑和数据收集过程的变化,也影响了这些合作的一致性和有效性。尽管存在这些挑战,但研究表明,当公平嵌入协作框架时,irc有可能促进有意义的学习和创新。该研究强调需要更公平的资助机制、领导力发展倡议和优先考虑包容性的方法战略。通过批判性地审视青年司法教育国际研究的复杂性,本文有助于更广泛地讨论IRCs如何更有效,即使在最受限制的研究背景下。研究结果对寻求加强国际合作在教育研究中的作用的政策制定者、资助机构和实践者具有直接意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational development in secure juvenile justice settings: The benefits, the challenges and power dynamics in international research collaborations
International research collaborations (IRCs) can play a significant role in shaping educational development, particularly in youth justice settings. This study explores the benefits, challenges, and structural inequalities within IRCs focused on education for justice-involved children and young people. Drawing on qualitative data from participants from three Erasmus+ -funded projects across multiple European countries, the findings highlight how IRCs enable the exchange of knowledge, the adaptation of educational practices, and the development of more inclusive policies. However, persistent structural inequalities shape the dynamics of these collaborations. Participants from lower-income countries were more aware of hierarchical power relations, reinforcing existing critiques of global North-South imbalances where similar patterns were observed within European partnerships. Leadership roles, funding, and research methodologies were influenced by perceived credibility of established institutions and economic disparities, impacting on equitable participation. Methodological challenges, including language barriers, ethical considerations, and variations in data collection processes, also shaped the consistency and effectiveness of these collaborations. Despite these challenges, the study demonstrates that IRCs have the potential to foster meaningful learning and innovation when equity is embedded in collaborative frameworks. The research highlights the need for more equitable funding mechanisms, leadership development initiatives, and methodological strategies that prioritise inclusion. By critically examining the complexities of international research in youth justice education, this paper contributes to broader discussions on how IRCs can be more effective, even in the most constrained of research contexts. The findings have direct implications for policymakers, funding bodies, and practitioners seeking to strengthen the role of international collaboration in educational research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信