Jing Li , Thitipong Tankumpuan , Aurawamon Sriyuktasuth , Patricia M. Davidson
{"title":"医患互动质量量表中文版的翻译与验证","authors":"Jing Li , Thitipong Tankumpuan , Aurawamon Sriyuktasuth , Patricia M. Davidson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While the importance of outpatient physician-patient interaction is increasingly recognized, there remains a lack of effective tools to assess these interactions in mainland China. This gap limits our understanding of the nuances in outpatient physician-patient interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to translate the Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI) into Chinese and validate its effectiveness in assessing the quality of outpatient physician-patient interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study recruited 466 outpatients using convenience sampling and was conducted in four phases: (1) translation and back-translation to develop the Chinese version of the QQPPI (QQPPI-C); (2) expert review for cultural and contextual relevance; (3) psychometric validation, including exploratory factor analysis on 140 participants and confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance, and convergent validity on the remaining 326; and (4) internal consistency assessment using Cronbach’s α and Guttman’s λ₄.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 466 participants (mean age 48.89 ± 14.93 years; 50.2 % male), 140 were randomly assigned for exploratory factor analysis, which supported a unidimensional scale structure explaining 52.12 % of the variance. The remaining 326 participants were used for confirmatory factor analysis and other validity assessments. confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit (χ²/df = 2.338, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.064, Incremental Fit Index = 0.937, Comparative Fit Index = 0.963, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.955, and Root Mean Square Residual = 0.031). The QQPPI-C showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.939, Guttman’s λ₄= 0.940), high content validity (scale-level content validity index = 0.968), adequate convergent validity, and measurement invariance across genders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The QQPPI-C is a reliable and valid tool for assessing outpatient physician-patient interaction quality in China. Its use can support clinical communication improvement and research on patient-centered care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and validation of the Chinese version of quality of physician-patient interaction scale\",\"authors\":\"Jing Li , Thitipong Tankumpuan , Aurawamon Sriyuktasuth , Patricia M. Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While the importance of outpatient physician-patient interaction is increasingly recognized, there remains a lack of effective tools to assess these interactions in mainland China. This gap limits our understanding of the nuances in outpatient physician-patient interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to translate the Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI) into Chinese and validate its effectiveness in assessing the quality of outpatient physician-patient interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study recruited 466 outpatients using convenience sampling and was conducted in four phases: (1) translation and back-translation to develop the Chinese version of the QQPPI (QQPPI-C); (2) expert review for cultural and contextual relevance; (3) psychometric validation, including exploratory factor analysis on 140 participants and confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance, and convergent validity on the remaining 326; and (4) internal consistency assessment using Cronbach’s α and Guttman’s λ₄.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 466 participants (mean age 48.89 ± 14.93 years; 50.2 % male), 140 were randomly assigned for exploratory factor analysis, which supported a unidimensional scale structure explaining 52.12 % of the variance. The remaining 326 participants were used for confirmatory factor analysis and other validity assessments. confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit (χ²/df = 2.338, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.064, Incremental Fit Index = 0.937, Comparative Fit Index = 0.963, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.955, and Root Mean Square Residual = 0.031). The QQPPI-C showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.939, Guttman’s λ₄= 0.940), high content validity (scale-level content validity index = 0.968), adequate convergent validity, and measurement invariance across genders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The QQPPI-C is a reliable and valid tool for assessing outpatient physician-patient interaction quality in China. Its use can support clinical communication improvement and research on patient-centered care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of quality of physician-patient interaction scale
Background
While the importance of outpatient physician-patient interaction is increasingly recognized, there remains a lack of effective tools to assess these interactions in mainland China. This gap limits our understanding of the nuances in outpatient physician-patient interactions.
Objective
This study aimed to translate the Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI) into Chinese and validate its effectiveness in assessing the quality of outpatient physician-patient interactions.
Methods
This study recruited 466 outpatients using convenience sampling and was conducted in four phases: (1) translation and back-translation to develop the Chinese version of the QQPPI (QQPPI-C); (2) expert review for cultural and contextual relevance; (3) psychometric validation, including exploratory factor analysis on 140 participants and confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance, and convergent validity on the remaining 326; and (4) internal consistency assessment using Cronbach’s α and Guttman’s λ₄.
Results
Among the 466 participants (mean age 48.89 ± 14.93 years; 50.2 % male), 140 were randomly assigned for exploratory factor analysis, which supported a unidimensional scale structure explaining 52.12 % of the variance. The remaining 326 participants were used for confirmatory factor analysis and other validity assessments. confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit (χ²/df = 2.338, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.064, Incremental Fit Index = 0.937, Comparative Fit Index = 0.963, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.955, and Root Mean Square Residual = 0.031). The QQPPI-C showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.939, Guttman’s λ₄= 0.940), high content validity (scale-level content validity index = 0.968), adequate convergent validity, and measurement invariance across genders.
Conclusions
The QQPPI-C is a reliable and valid tool for assessing outpatient physician-patient interaction quality in China. Its use can support clinical communication improvement and research on patient-centered care.