生成式人工智能能否驱动可持续的行为?人工智能驱动的可持续发展建议的消费者采用模型

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Andri Dayarana K. Silalahi
{"title":"生成式人工智能能否驱动可持续的行为?人工智能驱动的可持续发展建议的消费者采用模型","authors":"Andri Dayarana K. Silalahi","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Generative AI (GAI) has the potential to promote sustainable behavior through personalized recommendations; yet its effectiveness hinges on user trust—an issue that remains under-explored in the literature. Existing studies often focus on specific domains without addressing broader trust-building mechanisms or the cognitive and motivational factors needed for sustained engagement. This study investigates how trust shapes the adoption of GAI-driven sustainability recommendations by integrating the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) into a single framework. Using data from sustainability-oriented users, we examine how central route constructs-perceived information quality and utility-peripheral route constructs-anthropomorphism and interaction quality-enhance trust, while perceived information complexity and perceived risk moderate these relationships. Our findings indicate that high-quality, useful information enhances trust through cognitive engagement, whereas anthropomorphic design and interaction quality reinforce trust via the heuristic route. However, excessive complexity and privacy concerns undermine trust, highlighting the need for clearer communication and data transparency. This study broadens theoretical understanding by extending ELM and EVT to the context of GAI-driven sustainability efforts, providing an integrated framework that encompasses cognitive and motivational trust drivers. These insights fill gaps in technology adoption research and offer practical guidance for developing GAI platforms that effectively support pro-environmental behavior change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102995"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can generative artificial intelligence drive sustainable behavior? A consumer-adoption model for AI-driven sustainability recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Andri Dayarana K. Silalahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Generative AI (GAI) has the potential to promote sustainable behavior through personalized recommendations; yet its effectiveness hinges on user trust—an issue that remains under-explored in the literature. Existing studies often focus on specific domains without addressing broader trust-building mechanisms or the cognitive and motivational factors needed for sustained engagement. This study investigates how trust shapes the adoption of GAI-driven sustainability recommendations by integrating the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) into a single framework. Using data from sustainability-oriented users, we examine how central route constructs-perceived information quality and utility-peripheral route constructs-anthropomorphism and interaction quality-enhance trust, while perceived information complexity and perceived risk moderate these relationships. Our findings indicate that high-quality, useful information enhances trust through cognitive engagement, whereas anthropomorphic design and interaction quality reinforce trust via the heuristic route. However, excessive complexity and privacy concerns undermine trust, highlighting the need for clearer communication and data transparency. This study broadens theoretical understanding by extending ELM and EVT to the context of GAI-driven sustainability efforts, providing an integrated framework that encompasses cognitive and motivational trust drivers. These insights fill gaps in technology adoption research and offer practical guidance for developing GAI platforms that effectively support pro-environmental behavior change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500185X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2500185X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能(GAI)具有通过个性化推荐促进可持续行为的潜力;然而,它的有效性取决于用户的信任——这一问题在文献中仍未得到充分探讨。现有的研究往往侧重于特定领域,而没有解决更广泛的信任建立机制或持续参与所需的认知和动机因素。本研究通过将精化可能性模型(ELM)和期望价值理论(EVT)整合到一个框架中,探讨了信任如何影响采用ai驱动的可持续性建议。使用来自可持续性导向用户的数据,我们研究了中心路线结构-感知信息质量和效用-外围路线结构-拟人化和交互质量如何增强信任,而感知信息复杂性和感知风险调节了这些关系。我们的研究结果表明,高质量、有用的信息通过认知参与增强信任,而拟人化设计和互动质量通过启发式途径增强信任。然而,过度的复杂性和对隐私的担忧破坏了信任,凸显了对更清晰的沟通和数据透明度的需求。本研究通过将ELM和EVT扩展到ai驱动的可持续性努力的背景下,拓宽了理论理解,提供了一个包含认知和动机信任驱动因素的综合框架。这些见解填补了技术采用研究的空白,并为开发GAI平台提供了实际指导,这些平台有效地支持亲环境行为的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can generative artificial intelligence drive sustainable behavior? A consumer-adoption model for AI-driven sustainability recommendations
Generative AI (GAI) has the potential to promote sustainable behavior through personalized recommendations; yet its effectiveness hinges on user trust—an issue that remains under-explored in the literature. Existing studies often focus on specific domains without addressing broader trust-building mechanisms or the cognitive and motivational factors needed for sustained engagement. This study investigates how trust shapes the adoption of GAI-driven sustainability recommendations by integrating the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) into a single framework. Using data from sustainability-oriented users, we examine how central route constructs-perceived information quality and utility-peripheral route constructs-anthropomorphism and interaction quality-enhance trust, while perceived information complexity and perceived risk moderate these relationships. Our findings indicate that high-quality, useful information enhances trust through cognitive engagement, whereas anthropomorphic design and interaction quality reinforce trust via the heuristic route. However, excessive complexity and privacy concerns undermine trust, highlighting the need for clearer communication and data transparency. This study broadens theoretical understanding by extending ELM and EVT to the context of GAI-driven sustainability efforts, providing an integrated framework that encompasses cognitive and motivational trust drivers. These insights fill gaps in technology adoption research and offer practical guidance for developing GAI platforms that effectively support pro-environmental behavior change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信