{"title":"围手术期神经认知障碍的多基因和基于apoe的遗传风险评估:外科患者的生物库研究。","authors":"Mariana Thedim,Jie Hu,Matthew Maher,Jeanine Wiener-Kronish,Richa Saxena,Susana Vacas","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPreoperative risk assessment is a critical step in developing targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies. Although genetic biomarkers have shown considerable promise in assessing and stratifying dementia risk, their application in the perioperative period remains unexplored. Given the recognised effects of surgery and anaesthesia on perioperative cognitive trajectories, this study aimed to evaluate the preoperative neurocognitive genetic risk profiles of a surgical population and their influence on postoperative outcomes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nData from the Mass General Brigham Biobank were analysed for male and female surgical patients aged 40-89 yr without a previous diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease was calculated, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes were inferred from the study participants. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between APOE genotype and the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease with neurocognitive disorders.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe surgical population comprised 33 526 patients, of whom 86% had European ancestry and 25% carried at least one APOE-ε4 allele. Among patients of European ancestry, the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease was associated with higher risk of Alzheimer's disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.25 [95% confidence interval, 1.64-3.09]; false discovery rate [FDR] <0.001). Patients carrying APOE-ε4 alleles had an increased risk of neurocognitive disorders (e.g. delirium: OR, 1.32 [1.19-1.47], FDR <0.001; mild cognitive impairment: OR, 1.70 [1.49-1.94], FDR <0.001; and Alzheimer's disease: OR, 3.42 [2.72-4.29], FDR <0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAPOE genotypes and polygenic risk scores are valuable for exploring neurocognitive genetic risk profiles in surgical populations and have the potential to enhance preoperative risk assessment strategies.","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative polygenic and APOE-based genetic risk assessment for neurocognitive disorders: a biobank study of surgical patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Thedim,Jie Hu,Matthew Maher,Jeanine Wiener-Kronish,Richa Saxena,Susana Vacas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPreoperative risk assessment is a critical step in developing targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies. Although genetic biomarkers have shown considerable promise in assessing and stratifying dementia risk, their application in the perioperative period remains unexplored. Given the recognised effects of surgery and anaesthesia on perioperative cognitive trajectories, this study aimed to evaluate the preoperative neurocognitive genetic risk profiles of a surgical population and their influence on postoperative outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nData from the Mass General Brigham Biobank were analysed for male and female surgical patients aged 40-89 yr without a previous diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease was calculated, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes were inferred from the study participants. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between APOE genotype and the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease with neurocognitive disorders.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe surgical population comprised 33 526 patients, of whom 86% had European ancestry and 25% carried at least one APOE-ε4 allele. Among patients of European ancestry, the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease was associated with higher risk of Alzheimer's disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.25 [95% confidence interval, 1.64-3.09]; false discovery rate [FDR] <0.001). Patients carrying APOE-ε4 alleles had an increased risk of neurocognitive disorders (e.g. delirium: OR, 1.32 [1.19-1.47], FDR <0.001; mild cognitive impairment: OR, 1.70 [1.49-1.94], FDR <0.001; and Alzheimer's disease: OR, 3.42 [2.72-4.29], FDR <0.001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nAPOE genotypes and polygenic risk scores are valuable for exploring neurocognitive genetic risk profiles in surgical populations and have the potential to enhance preoperative risk assessment strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.014\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perioperative polygenic and APOE-based genetic risk assessment for neurocognitive disorders: a biobank study of surgical patients.
BACKGROUND
Preoperative risk assessment is a critical step in developing targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies. Although genetic biomarkers have shown considerable promise in assessing and stratifying dementia risk, their application in the perioperative period remains unexplored. Given the recognised effects of surgery and anaesthesia on perioperative cognitive trajectories, this study aimed to evaluate the preoperative neurocognitive genetic risk profiles of a surgical population and their influence on postoperative outcomes.
METHODS
Data from the Mass General Brigham Biobank were analysed for male and female surgical patients aged 40-89 yr without a previous diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease was calculated, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes were inferred from the study participants. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between APOE genotype and the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease with neurocognitive disorders.
RESULTS
The surgical population comprised 33 526 patients, of whom 86% had European ancestry and 25% carried at least one APOE-ε4 allele. Among patients of European ancestry, the polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease was associated with higher risk of Alzheimer's disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.25 [95% confidence interval, 1.64-3.09]; false discovery rate [FDR] <0.001). Patients carrying APOE-ε4 alleles had an increased risk of neurocognitive disorders (e.g. delirium: OR, 1.32 [1.19-1.47], FDR <0.001; mild cognitive impairment: OR, 1.70 [1.49-1.94], FDR <0.001; and Alzheimer's disease: OR, 3.42 [2.72-4.29], FDR <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
APOE genotypes and polygenic risk scores are valuable for exploring neurocognitive genetic risk profiles in surgical populations and have the potential to enhance preoperative risk assessment strategies.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.