氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症的种族差异。

IF 3.2
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240559
Michael Liu, Rachel Branning, Austin Lee, David Kaelber, Keming Gao
{"title":"氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症的种族差异。","authors":"Michael Liu, Rachel Branning, Austin Lee, David Kaelber, Keming Gao","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to investigate racial-ethnic disparities in the utilization of intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine therapy for major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TriNetX platform was used to identify 861,179 patients diagnosed as having moderate-to-severe recurrent major depressive disorder between January 2019 and October 2024. Patients were divided into non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match minority cohorts with White patients. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare ketamine and esketamine utilization across racial-ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, the authors found that ketamine was prescribed at lower rates among Black (RR=0.75, 95% CI=0.72-0.78), Hispanic (RR=0.71, 95% CI=0.68-0.75), and Asian (RR=0.65, 95% CI=0.57-0.75) patients compared with White patients. Esketamine was utilized at lower rates among Black patients (RR=0.74, 95% CI=0.62-0.88) and at higher rates among Hispanic patients (RR=1.45, 95% CI=1.24-1.69), whereas Asian patients showed no significant difference. Within-group comparison among Black and White patients found that individuals who received ketamine or esketamine in both cohorts had more comorbid general medical and psychiatric conditions than those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant racial-ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of ketamine and esketamine therapies for major depressive disorder, particularly affecting Black patients. Future research should investigate the underlying causes of these disparities and develop strategies to ensure equitable access to ketamine and esketamine for all patients with major depressive disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"818-826"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Ketamine and Esketamine Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Liu, Rachel Branning, Austin Lee, David Kaelber, Keming Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20240559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to investigate racial-ethnic disparities in the utilization of intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine therapy for major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TriNetX platform was used to identify 861,179 patients diagnosed as having moderate-to-severe recurrent major depressive disorder between January 2019 and October 2024. Patients were divided into non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match minority cohorts with White patients. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare ketamine and esketamine utilization across racial-ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, the authors found that ketamine was prescribed at lower rates among Black (RR=0.75, 95% CI=0.72-0.78), Hispanic (RR=0.71, 95% CI=0.68-0.75), and Asian (RR=0.65, 95% CI=0.57-0.75) patients compared with White patients. Esketamine was utilized at lower rates among Black patients (RR=0.74, 95% CI=0.62-0.88) and at higher rates among Hispanic patients (RR=1.45, 95% CI=1.24-1.69), whereas Asian patients showed no significant difference. Within-group comparison among Black and White patients found that individuals who received ketamine or esketamine in both cohorts had more comorbid general medical and psychiatric conditions than those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant racial-ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of ketamine and esketamine therapies for major depressive disorder, particularly affecting Black patients. Future research should investigate the underlying causes of these disparities and develop strategies to ensure equitable access to ketamine and esketamine for all patients with major depressive disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"818-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨静脉注射氯胺酮和鼻内使用艾氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症的种族差异。方法:使用TriNetX平台识别2019年1月至2024年10月期间诊断为中重度复发性重度抑郁症的861179例患者。患者被分为非西班牙裔白人组、非西班牙裔黑人组、非西班牙裔亚裔组和西班牙裔组。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于匹配少数族裔与白人患者。计算95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(rr),比较不同种族/民族人群氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮的使用情况。结果:在PSM后,作者发现与白人患者相比,黑人(RR=0.75, 95% CI=0.72-0.78)、西班牙裔(RR=0.71, 95% CI=0.68-0.75)和亚洲(RR=0.65, 95% CI=0.57-0.75)患者的氯胺酮处方率较低。埃氯胺酮在黑人患者中的使用率较低(RR=0.74, 95% CI=0.62-0.88),在西班牙裔患者中的使用率较高(RR=1.45, 95% CI=1.24-1.69),而亚洲患者的使用率无显著差异。在黑人和白人患者之间的组内比较发现,在两个队列中接受氯胺酮或艾氯胺酮治疗的个体比没有接受氯胺酮治疗的个体有更多的合并症和精神疾病。结论:氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症存在明显的种族差异,黑人患者尤其明显。未来的研究应调查这些差异的根本原因,并制定策略,以确保所有重度抑郁症患者公平获得氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Ketamine and Esketamine Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder.

Objective: This study sought to investigate racial-ethnic disparities in the utilization of intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine therapy for major depressive disorder.

Methods: The TriNetX platform was used to identify 861,179 patients diagnosed as having moderate-to-severe recurrent major depressive disorder between January 2019 and October 2024. Patients were divided into non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match minority cohorts with White patients. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare ketamine and esketamine utilization across racial-ethnic groups.

Results: After PSM, the authors found that ketamine was prescribed at lower rates among Black (RR=0.75, 95% CI=0.72-0.78), Hispanic (RR=0.71, 95% CI=0.68-0.75), and Asian (RR=0.65, 95% CI=0.57-0.75) patients compared with White patients. Esketamine was utilized at lower rates among Black patients (RR=0.74, 95% CI=0.62-0.88) and at higher rates among Hispanic patients (RR=1.45, 95% CI=1.24-1.69), whereas Asian patients showed no significant difference. Within-group comparison among Black and White patients found that individuals who received ketamine or esketamine in both cohorts had more comorbid general medical and psychiatric conditions than those who did not.

Conclusions: Significant racial-ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of ketamine and esketamine therapies for major depressive disorder, particularly affecting Black patients. Future research should investigate the underlying causes of these disparities and develop strategies to ensure equitable access to ketamine and esketamine for all patients with major depressive disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信