MAGiC机器人磁导航射频消融导管的首次人体试验结果。

IF 2.6
Gediminas Rackauskas, Ricardas Kundelis, Audrius Aidietis, Jurate Barysiene, Diana Sudaviciene, Justinas Bacevicius, Monika Kezeviciute, Germanas Marinskis, Niels Christian Foldager Sandgaard, Christian Jøns, Xu Chen, Peter Karl Jacobsen
{"title":"MAGiC机器人磁导航射频消融导管的首次人体试验结果。","authors":"Gediminas Rackauskas, Ricardas Kundelis, Audrius Aidietis, Jurate Barysiene, Diana Sudaviciene, Justinas Bacevicius, Monika Kezeviciute, Germanas Marinskis, Niels Christian Foldager Sandgaard, Christian Jøns, Xu Chen, Peter Karl Jacobsen","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02082-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) has demonstrated clinical utility in treating arrhythmia patients by providing direct distal-tip control of an ablation catheter, enhancing catheter precision, safety, and stability with an atraumatic catheter design. We aimed to assess the first in-human efficacy and safety of the new RMN-guided MAGiCTM radiofrequency ablation catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter single-arm, unblinded study enrolled 67 patients with arrhythmias that met EHRA guidelines for catheter ablation. All patients were treated for their index arrhythmia with the MAGiC RMN catheter. All other devices used in the procedures were approved for treatment including a RMN System (Genesis/Niobe<sup>®</sup>) used to navigate the MAGiC catheter. Acute procedural success and adverse events were assessed for all patients through discharge from the hospital in the days following the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven patients were treated as follows: 25 cases of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, 19 of premature ventricular contractions, 8 of Wolf-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, 8 of atrial fibrillation, 3 of atrial flutter, and 4 of ventricular tachycardia. Acute procedural success was 94%. There was one cardiac tamponade due to perforation of the right ventricular outflow tract during ablation. Otherwise, no adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study demonstrate good acute efficacy and safety of the MAGiC RMN ablation catheter independent of underlying arrhythmias. Contact force and stability with MAGiC seem improved compared to previous catheters available with RMN, and therefore radiofrequency energy delivery needs careful attention, especially in thin areas of the myocardium. Additional long-term data are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First in-human results of the MAGiC robotic magnetic navigation radiofrequency ablation catheter.\",\"authors\":\"Gediminas Rackauskas, Ricardas Kundelis, Audrius Aidietis, Jurate Barysiene, Diana Sudaviciene, Justinas Bacevicius, Monika Kezeviciute, Germanas Marinskis, Niels Christian Foldager Sandgaard, Christian Jøns, Xu Chen, Peter Karl Jacobsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-025-02082-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) has demonstrated clinical utility in treating arrhythmia patients by providing direct distal-tip control of an ablation catheter, enhancing catheter precision, safety, and stability with an atraumatic catheter design. We aimed to assess the first in-human efficacy and safety of the new RMN-guided MAGiCTM radiofrequency ablation catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter single-arm, unblinded study enrolled 67 patients with arrhythmias that met EHRA guidelines for catheter ablation. All patients were treated for their index arrhythmia with the MAGiC RMN catheter. All other devices used in the procedures were approved for treatment including a RMN System (Genesis/Niobe<sup>®</sup>) used to navigate the MAGiC catheter. Acute procedural success and adverse events were assessed for all patients through discharge from the hospital in the days following the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven patients were treated as follows: 25 cases of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, 19 of premature ventricular contractions, 8 of Wolf-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, 8 of atrial fibrillation, 3 of atrial flutter, and 4 of ventricular tachycardia. Acute procedural success was 94%. There was one cardiac tamponade due to perforation of the right ventricular outflow tract during ablation. Otherwise, no adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study demonstrate good acute efficacy and safety of the MAGiC RMN ablation catheter independent of underlying arrhythmias. Contact force and stability with MAGiC seem improved compared to previous catheters available with RMN, and therefore radiofrequency energy delivery needs careful attention, especially in thin areas of the myocardium. Additional long-term data are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02082-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02082-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器人磁导航(RMN)已经证明了其在治疗心律失常患者中的临床应用,通过提供对消融导管的直接远端控制,提高导管的精度、安全性和稳定性。我们的目的是评估新的rmn引导的MAGiCTM射频消融导管的首次人体疗效和安全性。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、单臂、非盲研究纳入了67例符合EHRA导管消融指南的心律失常患者。所有患者均使用MAGiC RMN导管治疗其指标心律失常。该过程中使用的所有其他设备均被批准用于治疗,包括用于导航MAGiC导管的RMN系统(Genesis/Niobe®)。对所有患者在手术后几天出院前的急性手术成功和不良事件进行评估。结果:67例患者中,房室结折返性心动过速25例,室性早搏19例,WPW综合征8例,房颤8例,心房扑动3例,室性心动过速4例。急性手术成功率为94%。消融过程中,右心室流出道穿孔导致1例心包填塞。除此之外,未观察到不良事件。结论:本研究结果表明MAGiC RMN消融导管具有良好的急性疗效和安全性,与潜在的心律失常无关。与先前的RMN导管相比,MAGiC的接触力和稳定性似乎有所改善,因此射频能量输送需要仔细注意,特别是在心肌的薄区域。需要更多的长期数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First in-human results of the MAGiC robotic magnetic navigation radiofrequency ablation catheter.

Background: Robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) has demonstrated clinical utility in treating arrhythmia patients by providing direct distal-tip control of an ablation catheter, enhancing catheter precision, safety, and stability with an atraumatic catheter design. We aimed to assess the first in-human efficacy and safety of the new RMN-guided MAGiCTM radiofrequency ablation catheter.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter single-arm, unblinded study enrolled 67 patients with arrhythmias that met EHRA guidelines for catheter ablation. All patients were treated for their index arrhythmia with the MAGiC RMN catheter. All other devices used in the procedures were approved for treatment including a RMN System (Genesis/Niobe®) used to navigate the MAGiC catheter. Acute procedural success and adverse events were assessed for all patients through discharge from the hospital in the days following the procedure.

Results: Sixty-seven patients were treated as follows: 25 cases of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, 19 of premature ventricular contractions, 8 of Wolf-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, 8 of atrial fibrillation, 3 of atrial flutter, and 4 of ventricular tachycardia. Acute procedural success was 94%. There was one cardiac tamponade due to perforation of the right ventricular outflow tract during ablation. Otherwise, no adverse events were observed.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate good acute efficacy and safety of the MAGiC RMN ablation catheter independent of underlying arrhythmias. Contact force and stability with MAGiC seem improved compared to previous catheters available with RMN, and therefore radiofrequency energy delivery needs careful attention, especially in thin areas of the myocardium. Additional long-term data are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信