Robert J Rushakoff, Esther Rov-Ikpah, Gwendolyn Lee, Paras B Mehta, Craig San Luis, Craig Johnson, Suneil Koliwad, Cynthia Fenton, Michael A Kohn
{"title":"新型住院患者自动自我调节皮下胰岛素算法:三年经验。一项观察性研究。","authors":"Robert J Rushakoff, Esther Rov-Ikpah, Gwendolyn Lee, Paras B Mehta, Craig San Luis, Craig Johnson, Suneil Koliwad, Cynthia Fenton, Michael A Kohn","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Achieving inpatient glycemic control in patients who are nil per os (NPO), on enteral tube feeds (TF), or total parental nutrition (TPN) remains extremely challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if, for inpatients with hyperglycemia who are NPO, on TF, or on TPN, an automated self-adjusting subcutaneous rapid acting insulin algorithm (SQIA) we developed and programmed into the EMR leads to improvements in glucose control compared to conventional insulin treatment (CI).Design/Intervention/Setting/PatientsRetrospective cohort study using EMR data from 9/3/2020 to 9/2/2023, of all adult inpatients, comparing point-of-care (POC) glucose measurements between patients on SQIA versus CI and either NPO, or on TF, or on TPN. The analysis looked at the proportion of q4 hour POC glucose levels in the following ranges: hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), in range (71-180 mg/dL), moderate hyperglycemia (181-250 mg/dL), and severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5,031 intervals (associated with 4310 hospitalizations) in which the patient was NPO or on TF or TPN and on the SQIA (73.5%) or CI (26.5%). The proportion of glucose values in the hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic ranges were significantly lower in the SQIA group vs. the CI group (hypoglycemia: 0.65% vs. 1.10%; difference -0.45%; -0.62 to -0.28%; p < 0.001; hyperglycemia: 5.40% vs. 6.65%; difference -1.25%; -2.03% to -0.46%; p = 0.002). With glucocorticoids, rates of severe hyperglycemia were lower for patients on the SQIA, particularly those receiving high-dose glucocorticoids (11.1% lower).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients had a lower proportion of both hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic measurements when their blood glucose levels were managed using the SQIA than when managed using conventional physician-driven insulin orders.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Inpatient Automated Self-Adjusting Subcutaneous Insulin Algorithm: Three-Year Experience. An observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Rushakoff, Esther Rov-Ikpah, Gwendolyn Lee, Paras B Mehta, Craig San Luis, Craig Johnson, Suneil Koliwad, Cynthia Fenton, Michael A Kohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgaf376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Achieving inpatient glycemic control in patients who are nil per os (NPO), on enteral tube feeds (TF), or total parental nutrition (TPN) remains extremely challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if, for inpatients with hyperglycemia who are NPO, on TF, or on TPN, an automated self-adjusting subcutaneous rapid acting insulin algorithm (SQIA) we developed and programmed into the EMR leads to improvements in glucose control compared to conventional insulin treatment (CI).Design/Intervention/Setting/PatientsRetrospective cohort study using EMR data from 9/3/2020 to 9/2/2023, of all adult inpatients, comparing point-of-care (POC) glucose measurements between patients on SQIA versus CI and either NPO, or on TF, or on TPN. The analysis looked at the proportion of q4 hour POC glucose levels in the following ranges: hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), in range (71-180 mg/dL), moderate hyperglycemia (181-250 mg/dL), and severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 5,031 intervals (associated with 4310 hospitalizations) in which the patient was NPO or on TF or TPN and on the SQIA (73.5%) or CI (26.5%). The proportion of glucose values in the hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic ranges were significantly lower in the SQIA group vs. the CI group (hypoglycemia: 0.65% vs. 1.10%; difference -0.45%; -0.62 to -0.28%; p < 0.001; hyperglycemia: 5.40% vs. 6.65%; difference -1.25%; -2.03% to -0.46%; p = 0.002). With glucocorticoids, rates of severe hyperglycemia were lower for patients on the SQIA, particularly those receiving high-dose glucocorticoids (11.1% lower).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients had a lower proportion of both hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic measurements when their blood glucose levels were managed using the SQIA than when managed using conventional physician-driven insulin orders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:实现零氧血症(NPO)、肠内管喂养(TF)或全父母营养(TPN)患者的住院血糖控制仍然极具挑战性。目的:为了确定,对于NPO、TF或TPN的高血糖住院患者,我们开发并编程到EMR中的自动自我调节皮下速效胰岛素算法(SQIA)与传统胰岛素治疗(CI)相比,是否能改善血糖控制。设计/干预/设置/患者回顾性队列研究,使用2020年3月9日至2023年2月9日所有成年住院患者的EMR数据,比较SQIA、CI和NPO、TF或TPN患者的即时(POC)血糖测量值。该分析着眼于q4小时POC葡萄糖水平在以下范围内的比例:低血糖(250 mg/dL)。结果:有5031个时间段(与4310次住院有关)患者为NPO或TF或TPN, SQIA(73.5%)或CI(26.5%)。与CI组相比,SQIA组低血糖和严重高血糖范围内的血糖值比例显著降低(低血糖:0.65% vs. 1.10%;差-0.45%;-0.62 ~ -0.28%;P < 0.001;高血糖:5.40% vs. 6.65%;差-1.25%;-2.03%至-0.46%;P = 0.002)。使用糖皮质激素,SQIA患者的严重高血糖率较低,特别是那些接受高剂量糖皮质激素的患者(降低11.1%)。结论:使用SQIA管理血糖水平的患者低血糖和严重高血糖的比例低于使用常规医生驱动的胰岛素命令管理的患者。
Context: Achieving inpatient glycemic control in patients who are nil per os (NPO), on enteral tube feeds (TF), or total parental nutrition (TPN) remains extremely challenging.
Objective: To determine if, for inpatients with hyperglycemia who are NPO, on TF, or on TPN, an automated self-adjusting subcutaneous rapid acting insulin algorithm (SQIA) we developed and programmed into the EMR leads to improvements in glucose control compared to conventional insulin treatment (CI).Design/Intervention/Setting/PatientsRetrospective cohort study using EMR data from 9/3/2020 to 9/2/2023, of all adult inpatients, comparing point-of-care (POC) glucose measurements between patients on SQIA versus CI and either NPO, or on TF, or on TPN. The analysis looked at the proportion of q4 hour POC glucose levels in the following ranges: hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), in range (71-180 mg/dL), moderate hyperglycemia (181-250 mg/dL), and severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL).
Results: There were 5,031 intervals (associated with 4310 hospitalizations) in which the patient was NPO or on TF or TPN and on the SQIA (73.5%) or CI (26.5%). The proportion of glucose values in the hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic ranges were significantly lower in the SQIA group vs. the CI group (hypoglycemia: 0.65% vs. 1.10%; difference -0.45%; -0.62 to -0.28%; p < 0.001; hyperglycemia: 5.40% vs. 6.65%; difference -1.25%; -2.03% to -0.46%; p = 0.002). With glucocorticoids, rates of severe hyperglycemia were lower for patients on the SQIA, particularly those receiving high-dose glucocorticoids (11.1% lower).
Conclusions: Patients had a lower proportion of both hypoglycemic and severely hyperglycemic measurements when their blood glucose levels were managed using the SQIA than when managed using conventional physician-driven insulin orders.