微创跟腱修复:Dresden与PARS/无结技术的回顾性比较研究。

IF 2.2
Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1177/10711007251341896
Mauro Andrés Goveo, Juan Ignacio Crosa, Juan Ignacio Peralta, Corali Colombo, Fernando Vago Anaya, Emiliano Loncharich
{"title":"微创跟腱修复:Dresden与PARS/无结技术的回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Mauro Andrés Goveo, Juan Ignacio Crosa, Juan Ignacio Peralta, Corali Colombo, Fernando Vago Anaya, Emiliano Loncharich","doi":"10.1177/10711007251341896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive techniques have emerged as promising options for the surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures, aiming to reduce complication rates associated with open procedures. However, comparative data between different minimally invasive methods are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, we evaluated 102 patients treated with either the Dresden or PARS/Knotless technique between January 2017 and June 2021. Clinical outcomes included time to return to sports, ankle range of motion, Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated similar rates of return to sports (91.48% PARS/Knotless vs 92.70% Dresden) and comparable ATRS scores (91.1 ± 6.7 vs 92.3 ± 8.9, <i>P</i> = .47). Surgical time was significantly shorter with the Dresden technique (38.3 ± 8.5 vs 43.5 ± 8.9 minutes, <i>P</i> = .005). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Dresden group (10.90% vs 29.78%, <i>P</i> = .024), primarily because of lower rates of calcaneodynia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both techniques demonstrated similar functional outcomes, the Dresden procedure was associated with a lower complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"951-957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair: Dresden vs PARS/Knotless Techniques in a Retrospective Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mauro Andrés Goveo, Juan Ignacio Crosa, Juan Ignacio Peralta, Corali Colombo, Fernando Vago Anaya, Emiliano Loncharich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251341896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive techniques have emerged as promising options for the surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures, aiming to reduce complication rates associated with open procedures. However, comparative data between different minimally invasive methods are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, we evaluated 102 patients treated with either the Dresden or PARS/Knotless technique between January 2017 and June 2021. Clinical outcomes included time to return to sports, ankle range of motion, Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated similar rates of return to sports (91.48% PARS/Knotless vs 92.70% Dresden) and comparable ATRS scores (91.1 ± 6.7 vs 92.3 ± 8.9, <i>P</i> = .47). Surgical time was significantly shorter with the Dresden technique (38.3 ± 8.5 vs 43.5 ± 8.9 minutes, <i>P</i> = .005). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Dresden group (10.90% vs 29.78%, <i>P</i> = .024), primarily because of lower rates of calcaneodynia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both techniques demonstrated similar functional outcomes, the Dresden procedure was associated with a lower complication rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"951-957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251341896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251341896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微创技术已成为急性跟腱断裂手术治疗的有希望的选择,旨在减少与开放手术相关的并发症发生率。然而,不同微创方法之间的比较数据有限。方法:在这个回顾性病例系列中,我们评估了2017年1月至2021年6月期间接受Dresden或PARS/Knotless技术治疗的102例患者。临床结果包括恢复运动时间、踝关节活动范围、跟腱总断裂评分(ATRS)和术后并发症。术后并发症也有记录。结果:两组的运动恢复率相似(91.48% PARS/Knotless vs 92.70% Dresden), ATRS评分相似(91.1±6.7 vs 92.3±8.9,P = 0.47)。Dresden技术的手术时间明显缩短(38.3±8.5 vs 43.5±8.9 min, P = 0.005)。德累斯顿组的总并发症发生率明显较低(10.90% vs 29.78%, P = 0.024),主要原因是跟痛症发生率较低。结论:虽然两种技术表现出相似的功能结果,但德累斯顿手术的并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair: Dresden vs PARS/Knotless Techniques in a Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background: Minimally invasive techniques have emerged as promising options for the surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures, aiming to reduce complication rates associated with open procedures. However, comparative data between different minimally invasive methods are limited.

Methods: In this retrospective case series, we evaluated 102 patients treated with either the Dresden or PARS/Knotless technique between January 2017 and June 2021. Clinical outcomes included time to return to sports, ankle range of motion, Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were also documented.

Results: Both groups demonstrated similar rates of return to sports (91.48% PARS/Knotless vs 92.70% Dresden) and comparable ATRS scores (91.1 ± 6.7 vs 92.3 ± 8.9, P = .47). Surgical time was significantly shorter with the Dresden technique (38.3 ± 8.5 vs 43.5 ± 8.9 minutes, P = .005). The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Dresden group (10.90% vs 29.78%, P = .024), primarily because of lower rates of calcaneodynia.

Conclusion: Although both techniques demonstrated similar functional outcomes, the Dresden procedure was associated with a lower complication rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信