外科ICU入院标准:范围审查。

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001278
Kenneth L Abbott, Philip Hong, Matthew M Ruppert, Purvi P Patel, Philip A Efron, Natasha Keric, Lewis J Kaplan, Niels D Martin, Tyler J Loftus
{"title":"外科ICU入院标准:范围审查。","authors":"Kenneth L Abbott, Philip Hong, Matthew M Ruppert, Purvi P Patel, Philip A Efron, Natasha Keric, Lewis J Kaplan, Niels D Martin, Tyler J Loftus","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of this scoping review were to: 1) explore factors driving surgical ICU (SICU) admission decisions, 2) provide an environmental scan of SICU admission practices, and 3) identify underexamined domains relevant for SICU triage, admission, and discharge inquiries.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, PubMed, and Medline were queried from inception to April 18, 2024, for English-language peer-reviewed studies related to adult SICU admission criteria and decision-making; neonatal ICU, PICU, veterinary ICU, and military ICU data and gray literature were excluded. Studies were not limited by design.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Following duplicate removal, 363 of the initial 625 abstracts remained. After content screening, 54 abstracts remained topic aligned. Full-text review identified 44 articles appropriate for analysis.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Abstracted data addressed SICU structure, function, findings, and potential future directions.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Most included studies (n = 23, 52%) focused on identifying risk factors for SICU admission or risk factors for the need for SICU admission, including demographics, comorbidities, and procedural specifics. Admission protocol evaluation studies were less common (n = 5, 11%), but offered promise in reducing unnecessary admissions using preoperative or postoperative interventions. Future inquiry domains included admission and discharge protocol development (n = 17, 39%), risk factors for ICU admission or the need for ICU admission (n = 16, 36%), multicenter studies (n = 16, 36%), additional or specific patient populations (n = 15, 34%), prospective studies (n = 14, 32%), costs (n = 6, 14%), and implementation of embedded clinical decision-support aids to inform SICU triage decision-making (n = 2, 5%). No included studies presented results regarding SICU discharge decision-making or ICU stress adaptations relevant during surge episodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research on SICU triage decision-making primarily focuses at admission risk factor discovery, with less emphasis on protocol evaluation and implementation practices. Future research should focus on refining existing SICU triage approaches that include discharge and surge-based decision-making coupled with deployable clinical decision-support aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 7","pages":"e1278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical ICU Admission Criteria: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth L Abbott, Philip Hong, Matthew M Ruppert, Purvi P Patel, Philip A Efron, Natasha Keric, Lewis J Kaplan, Niels D Martin, Tyler J Loftus\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of this scoping review were to: 1) explore factors driving surgical ICU (SICU) admission decisions, 2) provide an environmental scan of SICU admission practices, and 3) identify underexamined domains relevant for SICU triage, admission, and discharge inquiries.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, PubMed, and Medline were queried from inception to April 18, 2024, for English-language peer-reviewed studies related to adult SICU admission criteria and decision-making; neonatal ICU, PICU, veterinary ICU, and military ICU data and gray literature were excluded. Studies were not limited by design.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Following duplicate removal, 363 of the initial 625 abstracts remained. After content screening, 54 abstracts remained topic aligned. Full-text review identified 44 articles appropriate for analysis.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Abstracted data addressed SICU structure, function, findings, and potential future directions.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Most included studies (n = 23, 52%) focused on identifying risk factors for SICU admission or risk factors for the need for SICU admission, including demographics, comorbidities, and procedural specifics. Admission protocol evaluation studies were less common (n = 5, 11%), but offered promise in reducing unnecessary admissions using preoperative or postoperative interventions. Future inquiry domains included admission and discharge protocol development (n = 17, 39%), risk factors for ICU admission or the need for ICU admission (n = 16, 36%), multicenter studies (n = 16, 36%), additional or specific patient populations (n = 15, 34%), prospective studies (n = 14, 32%), costs (n = 6, 14%), and implementation of embedded clinical decision-support aids to inform SICU triage decision-making (n = 2, 5%). No included studies presented results regarding SICU discharge decision-making or ICU stress adaptations relevant during surge episodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research on SICU triage decision-making primarily focuses at admission risk factor discovery, with less emphasis on protocol evaluation and implementation practices. Future research should focus on refining existing SICU triage approaches that include discharge and surge-based decision-making coupled with deployable clinical decision-support aids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 7\",\"pages\":\"e1278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述的目的是:1)探索推动外科ICU (SICU)入院决定的因素,2)提供SICU入院实践的环境扫描,以及3)确定与SICU分诊、入院和出院查询相关的未被检查的领域。数据来源:Embase、PubMed和Medline从成立到2024年4月18日,查询与成人SICU入学标准和决策相关的英语同行评议研究;排除新生儿ICU、PICU、兽医ICU和军事ICU数据和灰色文献。研究没有受到设计的限制。研究选择:在重复删除后,最初的625篇摘要中有363篇保留下来。内容筛选后,54个摘要保持主题一致。全文审查确定了44篇适合分析的文章。数据提取:抽象的数据说明SICU的结构、功能、发现和潜在的未来发展方向。数据综合:大多数纳入的研究(n = 23, 52%)集中于确定SICU入院的危险因素或需要SICU入院的危险因素,包括人口统计学、合并症和手术细节。入院方案评估研究不太常见(n = 5, 11%),但在术前或术后干预减少不必要入院方面提供了希望。未来的调查领域包括入院和出院方案制定(n = 17,39%), ICU入院或ICU入院的危险因素(n = 16,36%),多中心研究(n = 16,36%),额外或特定患者人群(n = 15,34%),前瞻性研究(n = 14,32%),成本(n = 6,14%),以及嵌入式临床决策支持辅助工具的实施,以告知SICU分诊决策(n = 2,5%)。没有纳入的研究提出SICU出院决策或ICU压力适应与高潮发作相关的结果。结论:SICU分诊决策的研究主要集中在入院风险因素的发现上,较少关注方案评估和实施实践。未来的研究应侧重于改进现有的SICU分诊方法,包括基于出院和高峰的决策,以及可部署的临床决策支持辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Surgical ICU Admission Criteria: A Scoping Review.

Surgical ICU Admission Criteria: A Scoping Review.

Surgical ICU Admission Criteria: A Scoping Review.

Objectives: The aims of this scoping review were to: 1) explore factors driving surgical ICU (SICU) admission decisions, 2) provide an environmental scan of SICU admission practices, and 3) identify underexamined domains relevant for SICU triage, admission, and discharge inquiries.

Data sources: Embase, PubMed, and Medline were queried from inception to April 18, 2024, for English-language peer-reviewed studies related to adult SICU admission criteria and decision-making; neonatal ICU, PICU, veterinary ICU, and military ICU data and gray literature were excluded. Studies were not limited by design.

Study selection: Following duplicate removal, 363 of the initial 625 abstracts remained. After content screening, 54 abstracts remained topic aligned. Full-text review identified 44 articles appropriate for analysis.

Data extraction: Abstracted data addressed SICU structure, function, findings, and potential future directions.

Data synthesis: Most included studies (n = 23, 52%) focused on identifying risk factors for SICU admission or risk factors for the need for SICU admission, including demographics, comorbidities, and procedural specifics. Admission protocol evaluation studies were less common (n = 5, 11%), but offered promise in reducing unnecessary admissions using preoperative or postoperative interventions. Future inquiry domains included admission and discharge protocol development (n = 17, 39%), risk factors for ICU admission or the need for ICU admission (n = 16, 36%), multicenter studies (n = 16, 36%), additional or specific patient populations (n = 15, 34%), prospective studies (n = 14, 32%), costs (n = 6, 14%), and implementation of embedded clinical decision-support aids to inform SICU triage decision-making (n = 2, 5%). No included studies presented results regarding SICU discharge decision-making or ICU stress adaptations relevant during surge episodes.

Conclusions: Research on SICU triage decision-making primarily focuses at admission risk factor discovery, with less emphasis on protocol evaluation and implementation practices. Future research should focus on refining existing SICU triage approaches that include discharge and surge-based decision-making coupled with deployable clinical decision-support aids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信