对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间纽约市结核病诊所远程医疗服务的评估

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000898
Grace E Gao, Alice V Easton, Marco M Salerno, Matthew Angulo, Claudia Buchanan, Deandra J Ingram, Erica Humphrey, Marci Whitehead, Errol Robinson, Christine Chuck, Joseph Burzynski, Felicia Dworkin, Diana Nilsen, Michelle Macaraig
{"title":"对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间纽约市结核病诊所远程医疗服务的评估","authors":"Grace E Gao, Alice V Easton, Marco M Salerno, Matthew Angulo, Claudia Buchanan, Deandra J Ingram, Erica Humphrey, Marci Whitehead, Errol Robinson, Christine Chuck, Joseph Burzynski, Felicia Dworkin, Diana Nilsen, Michelle Macaraig","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In March 2020, three New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Tuberculosis (TB) clinics suspended most in-person services due to the COVID-19 pandemic and rapidly implemented telehealth to provide remote TB care. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with TB or latent TB infection (LTBI), who received treatment from TB clinics between April 2020 and December 2022, to compare telehealth and in-clinic services. To evaluate the success and breadth of the telehealth program, we compared patients who utilized telehealth with those who did not, analyzing differences in demographic characteristics and key outcomes, including utilization of telehealth, appointment completion, and treatment completion. \"Telehealth patients\" completed at least one scheduled telehealth visit during the study period. We conducted bivariate analyses comparing telehealth versus in-clinic patients. 56% (497/885) of patients with TB and 45% (954/2127) of patients with LTBI had a telehealth visit. Among patients with TB, no disparities in proportions of telehealth and in-clinic patients were observed for age (p = 0.31) or primary language spoken (p = 0.37). Among patients with LTBI, younger patients were more likely to use telehealth (p < 0.001). Using mixed-effects logistic regression models, the AOR of completing a telehealth visit was lower compared to in-clinic for patients with TB (0.77, CI:0.65-0.91). However, excluding April to June 2020, the AORs of completing a telehealth visit were comparable to an in-clinic visit for patients with TB (0.94, CI:0.77-1.14) and for patients with LTBI (0.96, CI:0.82-1.13). Among 641 patients with drug-susceptible TB, 95% (333/352) of telehealth patients completed treatment within one year compared to 88% (254/289) of in-clinic patients (p = 0.002). This result is limited to the descriptive summary of this study population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, NYC Health Department provided telehealth to many patients with TB and LTBI of diverse demographics, and telehealth services were mostly comparable to in-clinic services.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 6","pages":"e0000898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of telehealth services at New York City tuberculosis clinics throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Grace E Gao, Alice V Easton, Marco M Salerno, Matthew Angulo, Claudia Buchanan, Deandra J Ingram, Erica Humphrey, Marci Whitehead, Errol Robinson, Christine Chuck, Joseph Burzynski, Felicia Dworkin, Diana Nilsen, Michelle Macaraig\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In March 2020, three New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Tuberculosis (TB) clinics suspended most in-person services due to the COVID-19 pandemic and rapidly implemented telehealth to provide remote TB care. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with TB or latent TB infection (LTBI), who received treatment from TB clinics between April 2020 and December 2022, to compare telehealth and in-clinic services. To evaluate the success and breadth of the telehealth program, we compared patients who utilized telehealth with those who did not, analyzing differences in demographic characteristics and key outcomes, including utilization of telehealth, appointment completion, and treatment completion. \\\"Telehealth patients\\\" completed at least one scheduled telehealth visit during the study period. We conducted bivariate analyses comparing telehealth versus in-clinic patients. 56% (497/885) of patients with TB and 45% (954/2127) of patients with LTBI had a telehealth visit. Among patients with TB, no disparities in proportions of telehealth and in-clinic patients were observed for age (p = 0.31) or primary language spoken (p = 0.37). Among patients with LTBI, younger patients were more likely to use telehealth (p < 0.001). Using mixed-effects logistic regression models, the AOR of completing a telehealth visit was lower compared to in-clinic for patients with TB (0.77, CI:0.65-0.91). However, excluding April to June 2020, the AORs of completing a telehealth visit were comparable to an in-clinic visit for patients with TB (0.94, CI:0.77-1.14) and for patients with LTBI (0.96, CI:0.82-1.13). Among 641 patients with drug-susceptible TB, 95% (333/352) of telehealth patients completed treatment within one year compared to 88% (254/289) of in-clinic patients (p = 0.002). This result is limited to the descriptive summary of this study population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, NYC Health Department provided telehealth to many patients with TB and LTBI of diverse demographics, and telehealth services were mostly comparable to in-clinic services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"e0000898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年3月,由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,纽约市卫生和精神卫生部的三家结核病诊所暂停了大部分面对面服务,并迅速实施了远程医疗,以提供远程结核病治疗。我们对2020年4月至2022年12月期间在结核病诊所接受治疗的结核病或潜伏性结核病感染(LTBI)患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以比较远程医疗和门诊服务。为了评估远程医疗计划的成功和广度,我们比较了使用远程医疗的患者和未使用远程医疗的患者,分析了人口统计学特征和关键结果的差异,包括远程医疗的利用、预约完成和治疗完成。在研究期间,“远程医疗患者”至少完成了一次预定的远程医疗访问。我们对远程医疗和门诊患者进行了双变量分析。56%(497/885)的结核病患者和45%(954/2127)的LTBI患者进行过远程医疗访问。在结核病患者中,远程医疗和门诊患者的比例在年龄(p = 0.31)或主要语言(p = 0.37)方面没有差异。在LTBI患者中,年轻患者更有可能使用远程医疗(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of telehealth services at New York City tuberculosis clinics throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

In March 2020, three New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Tuberculosis (TB) clinics suspended most in-person services due to the COVID-19 pandemic and rapidly implemented telehealth to provide remote TB care. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with TB or latent TB infection (LTBI), who received treatment from TB clinics between April 2020 and December 2022, to compare telehealth and in-clinic services. To evaluate the success and breadth of the telehealth program, we compared patients who utilized telehealth with those who did not, analyzing differences in demographic characteristics and key outcomes, including utilization of telehealth, appointment completion, and treatment completion. "Telehealth patients" completed at least one scheduled telehealth visit during the study period. We conducted bivariate analyses comparing telehealth versus in-clinic patients. 56% (497/885) of patients with TB and 45% (954/2127) of patients with LTBI had a telehealth visit. Among patients with TB, no disparities in proportions of telehealth and in-clinic patients were observed for age (p = 0.31) or primary language spoken (p = 0.37). Among patients with LTBI, younger patients were more likely to use telehealth (p < 0.001). Using mixed-effects logistic regression models, the AOR of completing a telehealth visit was lower compared to in-clinic for patients with TB (0.77, CI:0.65-0.91). However, excluding April to June 2020, the AORs of completing a telehealth visit were comparable to an in-clinic visit for patients with TB (0.94, CI:0.77-1.14) and for patients with LTBI (0.96, CI:0.82-1.13). Among 641 patients with drug-susceptible TB, 95% (333/352) of telehealth patients completed treatment within one year compared to 88% (254/289) of in-clinic patients (p = 0.002). This result is limited to the descriptive summary of this study population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, NYC Health Department provided telehealth to many patients with TB and LTBI of diverse demographics, and telehealth services were mostly comparable to in-clinic services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信