易普利姆单抗和纳沃单抗治疗转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的实际毒性和预后的回顾性多中心分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173
Amélie Ciernik, Laure Ciernik, Peter Bonczkowitz, Monika Morak, Lucie Heinzerling, Yacine Bennaceur, Aleigha Lawless, Ryan Sullivan, Julian Kött, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas J Carter, Paul Nathan, Sophie Tschopp, Reinhard Dummer, Egle Ramelyte
{"title":"易普利姆单抗和纳沃单抗治疗转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的实际毒性和预后的回顾性多中心分析。","authors":"Amélie Ciernik, Laure Ciernik, Peter Bonczkowitz, Monika Morak, Lucie Heinzerling, Yacine Bennaceur, Aleigha Lawless, Ryan Sullivan, Julian Kött, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas J Carter, Paul Nathan, Sophie Tschopp, Reinhard Dummer, Egle Ramelyte","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy with a high rate of metastases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their success in metastatic UM (MUM) remains limited. This study evaluates toxicity and outcomes of ipi + nivo in the largest, multicenter MUM cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 131 MUM patients treated with ipi + nivo from 2016 to 2024 across 5 international centers. Rates of toxicity, response, and survival outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 131 patients, 37.4% of patients received 4 cycles of ipi + nivo. The most common reason for ipi + nivo discontinuation (31.3%) was toxicity. Of all treated patients, 80.2% experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 16.4%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 43.4%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was three months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. Patients receiving ipi + nivo as second-line therapy had lower ORR compared to patients who received ipi + nivo as first-line therapy (P = .04). Patients with exclusively extrahepatic metastases had a better ORR and OS compared to those with hepatic or mixed metastases (P = .02, P = .02, respectively). 20.6% of patients developed eosinophilia during treatment, which was associated with improved median OS (24 months vs 15 months, P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ipi + nivo shows moderate efficacy and clinically relevant toxicities in patients with MUM. Eosinophilia is a potential prognostic biomarker, that merits further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective multicenter analysis of real-life toxicity and outcome of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Amélie Ciernik, Laure Ciernik, Peter Bonczkowitz, Monika Morak, Lucie Heinzerling, Yacine Bennaceur, Aleigha Lawless, Ryan Sullivan, Julian Kött, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas J Carter, Paul Nathan, Sophie Tschopp, Reinhard Dummer, Egle Ramelyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy with a high rate of metastases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their success in metastatic UM (MUM) remains limited. This study evaluates toxicity and outcomes of ipi + nivo in the largest, multicenter MUM cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 131 MUM patients treated with ipi + nivo from 2016 to 2024 across 5 international centers. Rates of toxicity, response, and survival outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 131 patients, 37.4% of patients received 4 cycles of ipi + nivo. The most common reason for ipi + nivo discontinuation (31.3%) was toxicity. Of all treated patients, 80.2% experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 16.4%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 43.4%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was three months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. Patients receiving ipi + nivo as second-line therapy had lower ORR compared to patients who received ipi + nivo as first-line therapy (P = .04). Patients with exclusively extrahepatic metastases had a better ORR and OS compared to those with hepatic or mixed metastases (P = .02, P = .02, respectively). 20.6% of patients developed eosinophilia during treatment, which was associated with improved median OS (24 months vs 15 months, P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ipi + nivo shows moderate efficacy and clinically relevant toxicities in patients with MUM. Eosinophilia is a potential prognostic biomarker, that merits further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:葡萄膜黑色素瘤(Uveal melanoma, UM)是最常见的原发性眼部恶性肿瘤,具有较高的转移率。虽然免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs),包括ipilimumab和nivolumab (ipi+nivo),已经显示出对转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的疗效,但它们在转移性UM (MUM)中的成功仍然有限。本研究在最大的多中心MUM队列中评估ipi+nivo的毒性和结果。方法:我们分析了2016-2024年5个国际中心131例接受ipi+nivo治疗的MUM患者。评估毒性、反应率和生存结果。结果:131例患者中,37.4%的患者接受了4个周期的ipi+nivo。ipi+nivo停药最常见的原因是毒性(31.3%)。在所有接受治疗的患者中,80.2%出现免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。总有效率(ORR)为16.4%,疾病控制率(DCR)为43.4%。无进展生存期(PFS) 3个月,中位总生存期(OS) 18个月。与接受ipi+nivo作为一线治疗的患者相比,接受ipi+nivo作为二线治疗的患者ORR更低(p = 0.04)。单纯肝外转移患者的ORR和OS优于肝转移或混合转移患者(p = 0.02, p = 0.02)。20.6%的患者在治疗期间出现嗜酸性粒细胞增多,这与中位OS改善相关(24个月vs 15个月,p = 0.02)。结论:Ipi+nivo对MUM患者疗效中等,无临床相关毒副作用。嗜酸性粒细胞增多症是一种潜在的预后生物标志物,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective multicenter analysis of real-life toxicity and outcome of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy with a high rate of metastases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their success in metastatic UM (MUM) remains limited. This study evaluates toxicity and outcomes of ipi + nivo in the largest, multicenter MUM cohort.

Methods: We analyzed 131 MUM patients treated with ipi + nivo from 2016 to 2024 across 5 international centers. Rates of toxicity, response, and survival outcomes were assessed.

Results: Among 131 patients, 37.4% of patients received 4 cycles of ipi + nivo. The most common reason for ipi + nivo discontinuation (31.3%) was toxicity. Of all treated patients, 80.2% experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 16.4%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 43.4%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was three months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. Patients receiving ipi + nivo as second-line therapy had lower ORR compared to patients who received ipi + nivo as first-line therapy (P = .04). Patients with exclusively extrahepatic metastases had a better ORR and OS compared to those with hepatic or mixed metastases (P = .02, P = .02, respectively). 20.6% of patients developed eosinophilia during treatment, which was associated with improved median OS (24 months vs 15 months, P = .02).

Conclusions: Ipi + nivo shows moderate efficacy and clinically relevant toxicities in patients with MUM. Eosinophilia is a potential prognostic biomarker, that merits further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信