Amélie Ciernik, Laure Ciernik, Peter Bonczkowitz, Monika Morak, Lucie Heinzerling, Yacine Bennaceur, Aleigha Lawless, Ryan Sullivan, Julian Kött, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas J Carter, Paul Nathan, Sophie Tschopp, Reinhard Dummer, Egle Ramelyte
{"title":"易普利姆单抗和纳沃单抗治疗转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的实际毒性和预后的回顾性多中心分析。","authors":"Amélie Ciernik, Laure Ciernik, Peter Bonczkowitz, Monika Morak, Lucie Heinzerling, Yacine Bennaceur, Aleigha Lawless, Ryan Sullivan, Julian Kött, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas J Carter, Paul Nathan, Sophie Tschopp, Reinhard Dummer, Egle Ramelyte","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy with a high rate of metastases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their success in metastatic UM (MUM) remains limited. This study evaluates toxicity and outcomes of ipi + nivo in the largest, multicenter MUM cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 131 MUM patients treated with ipi + nivo from 2016 to 2024 across 5 international centers. Rates of toxicity, response, and survival outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 131 patients, 37.4% of patients received 4 cycles of ipi + nivo. The most common reason for ipi + nivo discontinuation (31.3%) was toxicity. Of all treated patients, 80.2% experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 16.4%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 43.4%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was three months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. Patients receiving ipi + nivo as second-line therapy had lower ORR compared to patients who received ipi + nivo as first-line therapy (P = .04). Patients with exclusively extrahepatic metastases had a better ORR and OS compared to those with hepatic or mixed metastases (P = .02, P = .02, respectively). 20.6% of patients developed eosinophilia during treatment, which was associated with improved median OS (24 months vs 15 months, P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ipi + nivo shows moderate efficacy and clinically relevant toxicities in patients with MUM. Eosinophilia is a potential prognostic biomarker, that merits further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective multicenter analysis of real-life toxicity and outcome of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Amélie Ciernik, Laure Ciernik, Peter Bonczkowitz, Monika Morak, Lucie Heinzerling, Yacine Bennaceur, Aleigha Lawless, Ryan Sullivan, Julian Kött, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas J Carter, Paul Nathan, Sophie Tschopp, Reinhard Dummer, Egle Ramelyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy with a high rate of metastases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their success in metastatic UM (MUM) remains limited. This study evaluates toxicity and outcomes of ipi + nivo in the largest, multicenter MUM cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 131 MUM patients treated with ipi + nivo from 2016 to 2024 across 5 international centers. Rates of toxicity, response, and survival outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 131 patients, 37.4% of patients received 4 cycles of ipi + nivo. The most common reason for ipi + nivo discontinuation (31.3%) was toxicity. Of all treated patients, 80.2% experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 16.4%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 43.4%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was three months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. Patients receiving ipi + nivo as second-line therapy had lower ORR compared to patients who received ipi + nivo as first-line therapy (P = .04). Patients with exclusively extrahepatic metastases had a better ORR and OS compared to those with hepatic or mixed metastases (P = .02, P = .02, respectively). 20.6% of patients developed eosinophilia during treatment, which was associated with improved median OS (24 months vs 15 months, P = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ipi + nivo shows moderate efficacy and clinically relevant toxicities in patients with MUM. Eosinophilia is a potential prognostic biomarker, that merits further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective multicenter analysis of real-life toxicity and outcome of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma.
Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy with a high rate of metastases. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), have shown efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their success in metastatic UM (MUM) remains limited. This study evaluates toxicity and outcomes of ipi + nivo in the largest, multicenter MUM cohort.
Methods: We analyzed 131 MUM patients treated with ipi + nivo from 2016 to 2024 across 5 international centers. Rates of toxicity, response, and survival outcomes were assessed.
Results: Among 131 patients, 37.4% of patients received 4 cycles of ipi + nivo. The most common reason for ipi + nivo discontinuation (31.3%) was toxicity. Of all treated patients, 80.2% experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 16.4%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 43.4%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was three months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. Patients receiving ipi + nivo as second-line therapy had lower ORR compared to patients who received ipi + nivo as first-line therapy (P = .04). Patients with exclusively extrahepatic metastases had a better ORR and OS compared to those with hepatic or mixed metastases (P = .02, P = .02, respectively). 20.6% of patients developed eosinophilia during treatment, which was associated with improved median OS (24 months vs 15 months, P = .02).
Conclusions: Ipi + nivo shows moderate efficacy and clinically relevant toxicities in patients with MUM. Eosinophilia is a potential prognostic biomarker, that merits further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.