成人健康素养评估的验证:Rasch测量模型方法。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sasha A Fleary, Monique Millington
{"title":"成人健康素养评估的验证:Rasch测量模型方法。","authors":"Sasha A Fleary, Monique Millington","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health literacy (HL) is implicated in medical adherence, preventive health, mental health help-seeking, and health decision-making. HL includes three core areas/qualities: functional, interactive/communicative, and critical. Though HL is important in health and health decision-making, research on HL is relatively limited, with most research focused on functional HL. A contributing factor to this research gap is the lack of interactive and critical HL assessments. To address this gap, this study modified and assessed the validity of the Assessments of Adolescent Health Literacy, test-based assessments of functional, interactive, and critical HL, in an adult sample. Adults (n = 2346) completed a measurement battery that included the modified Assessments of Adult Health Literacy (AAHL-Adult) item bank (12 functional, 15 interactive, and 9 critical HL questions), Newest Vital Sign, Single-Item Literacy Scale, demographics, and questions about HL-related behaviours. The assessments were evaluated and validated using Rasch measurement models. Convergent and criterion validity were assessed. The final 6-item functional, 7-item interactive, and 7-item critical HL assessments and their composite (20 items) fit their respective Rasch models. Item-level invariance was established for gender, race, ethnicity, education, and age across all assessments. Good convergent validity with the Newest Vital Sign and Single-Item Literacy Scale and good criterion validity with the HL-related behaviours were observed for all assessments. The AAHL-Adult is the first test-based instrument validated in USA that includes assessments of all three core qualities of HL. These assessments have utility across multiple settings, including public health program planning and evaluation, intervention development and evaluation, and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Assessments of Adult Health Literacy: a Rasch measurement model approach.\",\"authors\":\"Sasha A Fleary, Monique Millington\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daaf090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health literacy (HL) is implicated in medical adherence, preventive health, mental health help-seeking, and health decision-making. HL includes three core areas/qualities: functional, interactive/communicative, and critical. Though HL is important in health and health decision-making, research on HL is relatively limited, with most research focused on functional HL. A contributing factor to this research gap is the lack of interactive and critical HL assessments. To address this gap, this study modified and assessed the validity of the Assessments of Adolescent Health Literacy, test-based assessments of functional, interactive, and critical HL, in an adult sample. Adults (n = 2346) completed a measurement battery that included the modified Assessments of Adult Health Literacy (AAHL-Adult) item bank (12 functional, 15 interactive, and 9 critical HL questions), Newest Vital Sign, Single-Item Literacy Scale, demographics, and questions about HL-related behaviours. The assessments were evaluated and validated using Rasch measurement models. Convergent and criterion validity were assessed. The final 6-item functional, 7-item interactive, and 7-item critical HL assessments and their composite (20 items) fit their respective Rasch models. Item-level invariance was established for gender, race, ethnicity, education, and age across all assessments. Good convergent validity with the Newest Vital Sign and Single-Item Literacy Scale and good criterion validity with the HL-related behaviours were observed for all assessments. The AAHL-Adult is the first test-based instrument validated in USA that includes assessments of all three core qualities of HL. These assessments have utility across multiple settings, including public health program planning and evaluation, intervention development and evaluation, and clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康素养(HL)涉及医疗依从性、预防性健康、心理健康求助和健康决策。HL包括三个核心领域/品质:功能性、互动性/沟通性和批判性。尽管HL在健康和健康决策中具有重要作用,但对HL的研究相对有限,研究多集中在功能性HL。造成这一研究差距的一个因素是缺乏互动性和批判性的HL评估。为了解决这一差距,本研究在成人样本中修改并评估了青少年健康素养评估的有效性,即基于测试的功能性、互动性和批判性HL评估。成人(n = 2346)完成了一组测量,包括修改后的成人健康素养评估(AAHL-Adult)题库(12个功能性问题、15个交互式问题和9个关键HL问题)、最新生命体征、单项识字量表、人口统计学和HL相关行为问题。使用Rasch测量模型对评估进行评估和验证。评估收敛效度和标准效度。最终的6项功能性、7项互动性和7项关键性HL评估及其组合(20项)符合各自的Rasch模型。在所有评估中,建立了性别、种族、民族、教育和年龄的项目水平不变性。最新生命体征和单项读写能力量表具有良好的收敛效度,所有评估的hl相关行为具有良好的标准效度。AAHL-Adult是在美国验证的第一个基于测试的仪器,包括HL的所有三个核心品质的评估。这些评估有多种用途,包括公共卫生规划和评估,干预措施的发展和评估,以及临床设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Assessments of Adult Health Literacy: a Rasch measurement model approach.

Health literacy (HL) is implicated in medical adherence, preventive health, mental health help-seeking, and health decision-making. HL includes three core areas/qualities: functional, interactive/communicative, and critical. Though HL is important in health and health decision-making, research on HL is relatively limited, with most research focused on functional HL. A contributing factor to this research gap is the lack of interactive and critical HL assessments. To address this gap, this study modified and assessed the validity of the Assessments of Adolescent Health Literacy, test-based assessments of functional, interactive, and critical HL, in an adult sample. Adults (n = 2346) completed a measurement battery that included the modified Assessments of Adult Health Literacy (AAHL-Adult) item bank (12 functional, 15 interactive, and 9 critical HL questions), Newest Vital Sign, Single-Item Literacy Scale, demographics, and questions about HL-related behaviours. The assessments were evaluated and validated using Rasch measurement models. Convergent and criterion validity were assessed. The final 6-item functional, 7-item interactive, and 7-item critical HL assessments and their composite (20 items) fit their respective Rasch models. Item-level invariance was established for gender, race, ethnicity, education, and age across all assessments. Good convergent validity with the Newest Vital Sign and Single-Item Literacy Scale and good criterion validity with the HL-related behaviours were observed for all assessments. The AAHL-Adult is the first test-based instrument validated in USA that includes assessments of all three core qualities of HL. These assessments have utility across multiple settings, including public health program planning and evaluation, intervention development and evaluation, and clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信