2021年德克萨斯州立法会议前后研究人员政策相关知识、需求和自我效能的评价

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Kaitlin Brand, Shelby Flores-Thorpe, Yuzi Zhang, Amelia Roebuck, Tiffni Menendez, Rachel Linton, Taylor Bishop Scott, Max Crowley, Alexandra E van den Berg, Deanna M Hoelscher
{"title":"2021年德克萨斯州立法会议前后研究人员政策相关知识、需求和自我效能的评价","authors":"Kaitlin Brand, Shelby Flores-Thorpe, Yuzi Zhang, Amelia Roebuck, Tiffni Menendez, Rachel Linton, Taylor Bishop Scott, Max Crowley, Alexandra E van den Berg, Deanna M Hoelscher","doi":"10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate public health researchers' perceptions of policy-informed research, self-efficacy, knowledge and training needs both before and after participating in an initiative to improve their engagement with legislative offices during the January-May 2021 Texas Legislative Session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 111 researchers were contacted about participating in the initiative, and 45 expressed interest and were thus enrolled. After receiving training on communication skills specific to legislative audiences, 27 researchers were matched with participating legislative offices based on location, availability and expertise. Self-administered surveys assessed policy informed research, self-efficacy, knowledge and training needs pre- and post-session. Paired t-tests compared pre- and post-session mean scale scores. Two-sample t-tests compared scale scores between matched and unmatched researchers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Most researchers (66 per cent) communicated with legislative offices fewer than five times during the previous two years. Compared to pre-session (baseline), there was a significant increase in reported policy knowledge and a significant decrease in perceived training needs in the post-session (follow-up) survey among all researchers. At baseline, legislator-matched researchers had significantly higher policy-related self-efficacy and lower perceived training needs than the unmatched researchers; however, scores between matched and unmatched researchers were not significantly different at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that actively applying learned skills through the research-to-policy framework is beneficial in building researchers' policy-related knowledge and their preparedness to engage with state legislators. The resulting potential for researcher-legislator partnerships to transform our public health system is highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of researchers' policy-related knowledge, needs and self-efficacy before and after the 2021 Texas Legislative Session.\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlin Brand, Shelby Flores-Thorpe, Yuzi Zhang, Amelia Roebuck, Tiffni Menendez, Rachel Linton, Taylor Bishop Scott, Max Crowley, Alexandra E van den Berg, Deanna M Hoelscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate public health researchers' perceptions of policy-informed research, self-efficacy, knowledge and training needs both before and after participating in an initiative to improve their engagement with legislative offices during the January-May 2021 Texas Legislative Session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 111 researchers were contacted about participating in the initiative, and 45 expressed interest and were thus enrolled. After receiving training on communication skills specific to legislative audiences, 27 researchers were matched with participating legislative offices based on location, availability and expertise. Self-administered surveys assessed policy informed research, self-efficacy, knowledge and training needs pre- and post-session. Paired t-tests compared pre- and post-session mean scale scores. Two-sample t-tests compared scale scores between matched and unmatched researchers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Most researchers (66 per cent) communicated with legislative offices fewer than five times during the previous two years. Compared to pre-session (baseline), there was a significant increase in reported policy knowledge and a significant decrease in perceived training needs in the post-session (follow-up) survey among all researchers. At baseline, legislator-matched researchers had significantly higher policy-related self-efficacy and lower perceived training needs than the unmatched researchers; however, scores between matched and unmatched researchers were not significantly different at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that actively applying learned skills through the research-to-policy framework is beneficial in building researchers' policy-related knowledge and their preparedness to engage with state legislators. The resulting potential for researcher-legislator partnerships to transform our public health system is highlighted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估公共卫生研究人员在参与一项倡议之前和之后对政策知情研究、自我效能感、知识和培训需求的看法,该倡议旨在改善他们在2021年1月至5月德克萨斯州立法会议期间与立法机构的接触。方法:共联系了111位研究人员参与该计划,其中45位表示有兴趣并被纳入。27名研究人员在接受了专门针对立法机构受众的沟通技巧培训后,根据地点、有无情况和专门知识,与参与的立法机构配对。自我管理的调查评估了政策知情研究、自我效能、知识和培训需求。配对t检验比较了治疗前和治疗后的平均量表得分。双样本t检验比较匹配和不匹配研究人员之间的量表得分。调查结果:大多数研究人员(66%)在过去两年中与立法机构沟通的次数少于5次。与会前(基线)相比,在所有研究人员的会后(随访)调查中,报告的政策知识显著增加,感知的培训需求显著减少。在基线水平上,立法者匹配的研究人员的政策相关自我效能显著高于未匹配的研究人员,而感知的培训需求显著低于未匹配的研究人员;然而,配对研究人员和未配对研究人员的得分在随访中没有显著差异。讨论和结论:我们的研究结果表明,通过“从研究到政策”的框架积极应用所学技能,有利于建立研究人员与政策相关的知识,并为他们与州立法者接触做好准备。由此产生的研究人员-立法者合作伙伴关系的潜力,以改变我们的公共卫生系统被强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of researchers' policy-related knowledge, needs and self-efficacy before and after the 2021 Texas Legislative Session.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate public health researchers' perceptions of policy-informed research, self-efficacy, knowledge and training needs both before and after participating in an initiative to improve their engagement with legislative offices during the January-May 2021 Texas Legislative Session.

Methods: A total of 111 researchers were contacted about participating in the initiative, and 45 expressed interest and were thus enrolled. After receiving training on communication skills specific to legislative audiences, 27 researchers were matched with participating legislative offices based on location, availability and expertise. Self-administered surveys assessed policy informed research, self-efficacy, knowledge and training needs pre- and post-session. Paired t-tests compared pre- and post-session mean scale scores. Two-sample t-tests compared scale scores between matched and unmatched researchers.

Findings: Most researchers (66 per cent) communicated with legislative offices fewer than five times during the previous two years. Compared to pre-session (baseline), there was a significant increase in reported policy knowledge and a significant decrease in perceived training needs in the post-session (follow-up) survey among all researchers. At baseline, legislator-matched researchers had significantly higher policy-related self-efficacy and lower perceived training needs than the unmatched researchers; however, scores between matched and unmatched researchers were not significantly different at follow-up.

Discussion and conclusions: Our findings show that actively applying learned skills through the research-to-policy framework is beneficial in building researchers' policy-related knowledge and their preparedness to engage with state legislators. The resulting potential for researcher-legislator partnerships to transform our public health system is highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信