确定C5/6水平椎间孔横截面积最合适的截断点以预测颈椎椎间孔骨狭窄。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Joohyun Lee, Jee Young Lee, Keum Nae Kang, Jae Ni Jang, Sukhee Park, Young Uk Kim
{"title":"确定C5/6水平椎间孔横截面积最合适的截断点以预测颈椎椎间孔骨狭窄。","authors":"Joohyun Lee, Jee Young Lee, Keum Nae Kang, Jae Ni Jang, Sukhee Park, Young Uk Kim","doi":"10.3390/tomography11060067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Cervical foraminal bony stenosis (CFBS) is a common degenerative spinal condition that causes radicular pain and functional impairment in the upper extremities. Accurate and objective diagnosis of CFBS remains challenging due to the absence of standardized morphometric criteria. This study aimed to determine an optimal cut-off value for the cervical foraminal cross-sectional area (CFCSA) at the C5/6 level as a diagnostic indicator of CFBS. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective case-control study including 154 patients aged 50 years or older with clinically and radiologically confirmed CFBS and 150 age-matched asymptomatic controls. Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all subjects and CFCSA measurements were obtained from sagittal T2-weighted images using a standardized protocol. Group differences were analyzed using <i>t</i>-tests and diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. <b>Results</b>: The mean CFCSA was significantly lower in the CFBS group (25.65 ± 7.19 mm<sup>2</sup>) compared to the control group (43.00 ± 8.38 mm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROC analysis identified a CFCSA threshold of 33.02 mm<sup>2</sup> as the optimal cut-off point for predicting CFBS, yielding a sensitivity of 86.4%, a specificity of 86.7%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that CFCSA is a robust and reproducible morphological parameter for evaluating foraminal stenosis. The proposed cut-off may enhance diagnostic accuracy and aid in clinical decision-making for patients presenting with C6 radiculopathy. However, given this study's retrospective, single-center design, further validation through multicenter, prospective studies across multiple cervical levels is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51330,"journal":{"name":"Tomography","volume":"11 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the Most Suitable Cut-Off Point of the Cervical Foraminal Cross-Sectional Area at the C5/6 Level to Predict Cervical Foraminal Bony Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Joohyun Lee, Jee Young Lee, Keum Nae Kang, Jae Ni Jang, Sukhee Park, Young Uk Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/tomography11060067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Cervical foraminal bony stenosis (CFBS) is a common degenerative spinal condition that causes radicular pain and functional impairment in the upper extremities. Accurate and objective diagnosis of CFBS remains challenging due to the absence of standardized morphometric criteria. This study aimed to determine an optimal cut-off value for the cervical foraminal cross-sectional area (CFCSA) at the C5/6 level as a diagnostic indicator of CFBS. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective case-control study including 154 patients aged 50 years or older with clinically and radiologically confirmed CFBS and 150 age-matched asymptomatic controls. Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all subjects and CFCSA measurements were obtained from sagittal T2-weighted images using a standardized protocol. Group differences were analyzed using <i>t</i>-tests and diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. <b>Results</b>: The mean CFCSA was significantly lower in the CFBS group (25.65 ± 7.19 mm<sup>2</sup>) compared to the control group (43.00 ± 8.38 mm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROC analysis identified a CFCSA threshold of 33.02 mm<sup>2</sup> as the optimal cut-off point for predicting CFBS, yielding a sensitivity of 86.4%, a specificity of 86.7%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that CFCSA is a robust and reproducible morphological parameter for evaluating foraminal stenosis. The proposed cut-off may enhance diagnostic accuracy and aid in clinical decision-making for patients presenting with C6 radiculopathy. However, given this study's retrospective, single-center design, further validation through multicenter, prospective studies across multiple cervical levels is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tomography\",\"volume\":\"11 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11060067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11060067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈椎椎间孔骨狭窄症(CFBS)是一种常见的脊柱退行性疾病,可引起神经根性疼痛和上肢功能障碍。由于缺乏标准化的形态计量标准,CFBS的准确和客观诊断仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定C5/6水平的颈椎椎间孔横截面积(CFCSA)作为CFBS诊断指标的最佳临界值。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,包括154名年龄在50岁及以上的临床和放射学证实的CFBS患者和150名年龄匹配的无症状对照组。对所有受试者进行颈椎磁共振成像(MRI),并采用标准化方案从矢状t2加权图像获得CFCSA测量值。采用t检验分析组间差异,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估诊断效果。结果:CFBS组CFCSA平均值(25.65±7.19 mm2)明显低于对照组(43.00±8.38 mm2);P < 0.001)。ROC分析确定CFCSA阈值33.02 mm2为预测CFBS的最佳截止点,敏感性为86.4%,特异性为86.7%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96)。结论:这些结果表明CFCSA是评估椎间孔狭窄的可靠且可重复的形态学参数。建议的切断可能会提高诊断的准确性,并有助于C6神经根病患者的临床决策。然而,鉴于本研究为回顾性、单中心设计,需要通过多中心、跨多个颈椎水平的前瞻性研究进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of the Most Suitable Cut-Off Point of the Cervical Foraminal Cross-Sectional Area at the C5/6 Level to Predict Cervical Foraminal Bony Stenosis.

Background: Cervical foraminal bony stenosis (CFBS) is a common degenerative spinal condition that causes radicular pain and functional impairment in the upper extremities. Accurate and objective diagnosis of CFBS remains challenging due to the absence of standardized morphometric criteria. This study aimed to determine an optimal cut-off value for the cervical foraminal cross-sectional area (CFCSA) at the C5/6 level as a diagnostic indicator of CFBS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study including 154 patients aged 50 years or older with clinically and radiologically confirmed CFBS and 150 age-matched asymptomatic controls. Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all subjects and CFCSA measurements were obtained from sagittal T2-weighted images using a standardized protocol. Group differences were analyzed using t-tests and diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The mean CFCSA was significantly lower in the CFBS group (25.65 ± 7.19 mm2) compared to the control group (43.00 ± 8.38 mm2; p < 0.001). ROC analysis identified a CFCSA threshold of 33.02 mm2 as the optimal cut-off point for predicting CFBS, yielding a sensitivity of 86.4%, a specificity of 86.7%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Conclusions: These findings suggest that CFCSA is a robust and reproducible morphological parameter for evaluating foraminal stenosis. The proposed cut-off may enhance diagnostic accuracy and aid in clinical decision-making for patients presenting with C6 radiculopathy. However, given this study's retrospective, single-center design, further validation through multicenter, prospective studies across multiple cervical levels is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tomography
Tomography Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
222
期刊介绍: TomographyTM publishes basic (technical and pre-clinical) and clinical scientific articles which involve the advancement of imaging technologies. Tomography encompasses studies that use single or multiple imaging modalities including for example CT, US, PET, SPECT, MR and hyperpolarization technologies, as well as optical modalities (i.e. bioluminescence, photoacoustic, endomicroscopy, fiber optic imaging and optical computed tomography) in basic sciences, engineering, preclinical and clinical medicine. Tomography also welcomes studies involving exploration and refinement of contrast mechanisms and image-derived metrics within and across modalities toward the development of novel imaging probes for image-based feedback and intervention. The use of imaging in biology and medicine provides unparalleled opportunities to noninvasively interrogate tissues to obtain real-time dynamic and quantitative information required for diagnosis and response to interventions and to follow evolving pathological conditions. As multi-modal studies and the complexities of imaging technologies themselves are ever increasing to provide advanced information to scientists and clinicians. Tomography provides a unique publication venue allowing investigators the opportunity to more precisely communicate integrated findings related to the diverse and heterogeneous features associated with underlying anatomical, physiological, functional, metabolic and molecular genetic activities of normal and diseased tissue. Thus Tomography publishes peer-reviewed articles which involve the broad use of imaging of any tissue and disease type including both preclinical and clinical investigations. In addition, hardware/software along with chemical and molecular probe advances are welcome as they are deemed to significantly contribute towards the long-term goal of improving the overall impact of imaging on scientific and clinical discovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信