开角型青光眼患者经腔内镜检辅助小梁切开术与弯Ab针间切术比较。

Q3 Medicine
Ahmet Yücel Üçgül, Rukiye Kılıç Üçgül, Zeynep Aktaş
{"title":"开角型青光眼患者经腔内镜检辅助小梁切开术与弯Ab针间切术比较。","authors":"Ahmet Yücel Üçgül, Rukiye Kılıç Üçgül, Zeynep Aktaş","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.44773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) and bent ab interno needle goniectomy (BANG) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 65 eyes diagnosed with OAG that underwent GATT (34 eyes) or BANG (31 eyes). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at baseline and during follow-up visits. Success was categorized as qualified (IOP ≤21 mmHg with ≥20% reduction) and complete (same criteria without medication). Complications and the need for further surgery were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative mean IOP was 32.9±6.1 mmHg for GATT and 31.8±5.4 mmHg for BANG. At the final visit, mean IOP was reduced to 15.8±4.5 mmHg in the GATT group (51.9% reduction) and 17.9±5.7 mmHg in the BANG group (43.7% reduction). The complete success rate was 88.2% for GATT and 61.3% for BANG. Early failures were more frequent in BANG, while GATT showed fewer but later failures. Both procedures had minimal complications, with transient hyphema being the most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, GATT provided greater and more sustained IOP reduction and higher long-term success rates compared to BANG, making it a more reliable option for managing OAG.</p>","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"55 3","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy versus Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Yücel Üçgül, Rukiye Kılıç Üçgül, Zeynep Aktaş\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.44773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) and bent ab interno needle goniectomy (BANG) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 65 eyes diagnosed with OAG that underwent GATT (34 eyes) or BANG (31 eyes). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at baseline and during follow-up visits. Success was categorized as qualified (IOP ≤21 mmHg with ≥20% reduction) and complete (same criteria without medication). Complications and the need for further surgery were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative mean IOP was 32.9±6.1 mmHg for GATT and 31.8±5.4 mmHg for BANG. At the final visit, mean IOP was reduced to 15.8±4.5 mmHg in the GATT group (51.9% reduction) and 17.9±5.7 mmHg in the BANG group (43.7% reduction). The complete success rate was 88.2% for GATT and 61.3% for BANG. Early failures were more frequent in BANG, while GATT showed fewer but later failures. Both procedures had minimal complications, with transient hyphema being the most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, GATT provided greater and more sustained IOP reduction and higher long-term success rates compared to BANG, making it a more reliable option for managing OAG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"141-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12192189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.44773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.44773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较gonioscopy辅助下腔内小梁切开术(GATT)与弯腹针间骨切开术(BANG)治疗开角型青光眼(OAG)的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:本回顾性比较研究包括65只诊断为OAG的眼,接受GATT(34只)或BANG(31只)。在基线和随访期间使用Goldmann眼压计测量眼压(IOP)。成功分为合格(IOP≤21 mmHg,降低≥20%)和完全(无药物治疗的相同标准)。记录并发症和进一步手术的需要。结果:GATT患者术前平均IOP为32.9±6.1 mmHg, BANG患者术前平均IOP为31.8±5.4 mmHg。在最后一次就诊时,GATT组的平均IOP降低到15.8±4.5 mmHg(降低51.9%),BANG组的平均IOP降低到17.9±5.7 mmHg(降低43.7%)。GATT和BANG的完全成功率分别为88.2%和61.3%。BANG的早期失败更为频繁,而GATT的失败较少,但较晚。两种手术的并发症都很小,短暂性前房积血是最常见的。结论:在本研究中,与BANG相比,GATT提供了更大、更持久的IOP降低和更高的长期成功率,使其成为治疗OAG的更可靠的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy versus Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) and bent ab interno needle goniectomy (BANG) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

Materials and methods: This retrospective comparative study included 65 eyes diagnosed with OAG that underwent GATT (34 eyes) or BANG (31 eyes). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at baseline and during follow-up visits. Success was categorized as qualified (IOP ≤21 mmHg with ≥20% reduction) and complete (same criteria without medication). Complications and the need for further surgery were recorded.

Results: Preoperative mean IOP was 32.9±6.1 mmHg for GATT and 31.8±5.4 mmHg for BANG. At the final visit, mean IOP was reduced to 15.8±4.5 mmHg in the GATT group (51.9% reduction) and 17.9±5.7 mmHg in the BANG group (43.7% reduction). The complete success rate was 88.2% for GATT and 61.3% for BANG. Early failures were more frequent in BANG, while GATT showed fewer but later failures. Both procedures had minimal complications, with transient hyphema being the most common.

Conclusion: In this study, GATT provided greater and more sustained IOP reduction and higher long-term success rates compared to BANG, making it a more reliable option for managing OAG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信