社区参与的医学模拟中支持跨性别和性别多样化标准化患者的定性研究。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Steven Allon, Andrew Kittleson, Pepper Heifner, David Schlundt, Kemberlee Bonnet, Arna Banerjee, Christopher Terndrup
{"title":"社区参与的医学模拟中支持跨性别和性别多样化标准化患者的定性研究。","authors":"Steven Allon, Andrew Kittleson, Pepper Heifner, David Schlundt, Kemberlee Bonnet, Arna Banerjee, Christopher Terndrup","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09640-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals experience high rates of adverse physical and mental health outcomes, in part due to negative healthcare experiences that discourage healthcare utilization. Affirming practices by providers can mitigate this distress, but medical education to build these skills is limited. Medical simulation offers an opportunity to enhance affirming communication, but best practices in supporting TGD standardized patients (SPs) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to develop a preliminary guideline on recruitment, portrayal, and support of TGD SPs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We utilized a modified Delphi technique to identify consensus guidelines for medical simulation programs incorporating TGD individuals as standardized actors in simulation scenarios.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty TGD community members and parents of TGD children in Middle Tennessee provided embodied knowledge.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We administered a survey examining participants' perspectives on recruitment, casting, and supporting TGD SPs in medical simulations. Thematic analysis was used to derive guideline statements, which were refined using participant feedback over two additional survey rounds.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Our sample consisted of 50 participants (96% TGD). We derived 44 guideline statements related to recruitment, casting, and supporting TGD SPs. Participants recommended recruitment of prospective TGD SPs through established venues holding trusted relationships with the TGD community, honestly conveying the benefits and drawbacks of this work. A gradient of acceptable casting decisions emerged, anchored by the gender identity of the simulated patient, to ensure shared lived experiences between an SP and their cast role. Participants offered strategies throughout simulation encounters to enhance TGD SPs' agency, facilitate psychological safety, and process emotions to improve simulation programs' support of TGD SPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We utilized a modified Delphi technique with TGD community members to derive a consensus guideline to support TGD SPs. Our study addressed key unresolved questions in the literature, particularly around recruitment and casting, with a high level of agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-Engaged Qualitative Study on Supporting Transgender and Gender-Diverse Standardized Patients in Medical Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Allon, Andrew Kittleson, Pepper Heifner, David Schlundt, Kemberlee Bonnet, Arna Banerjee, Christopher Terndrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09640-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals experience high rates of adverse physical and mental health outcomes, in part due to negative healthcare experiences that discourage healthcare utilization. Affirming practices by providers can mitigate this distress, but medical education to build these skills is limited. Medical simulation offers an opportunity to enhance affirming communication, but best practices in supporting TGD standardized patients (SPs) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to develop a preliminary guideline on recruitment, portrayal, and support of TGD SPs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We utilized a modified Delphi technique to identify consensus guidelines for medical simulation programs incorporating TGD individuals as standardized actors in simulation scenarios.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty TGD community members and parents of TGD children in Middle Tennessee provided embodied knowledge.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We administered a survey examining participants' perspectives on recruitment, casting, and supporting TGD SPs in medical simulations. Thematic analysis was used to derive guideline statements, which were refined using participant feedback over two additional survey rounds.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Our sample consisted of 50 participants (96% TGD). We derived 44 guideline statements related to recruitment, casting, and supporting TGD SPs. Participants recommended recruitment of prospective TGD SPs through established venues holding trusted relationships with the TGD community, honestly conveying the benefits and drawbacks of this work. A gradient of acceptable casting decisions emerged, anchored by the gender identity of the simulated patient, to ensure shared lived experiences between an SP and their cast role. Participants offered strategies throughout simulation encounters to enhance TGD SPs' agency, facilitate psychological safety, and process emotions to improve simulation programs' support of TGD SPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We utilized a modified Delphi technique with TGD community members to derive a consensus guideline to support TGD SPs. Our study addressed key unresolved questions in the literature, particularly around recruitment and casting, with a high level of agreement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09640-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09640-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)个体经历不良身心健康结果的比例很高,部分原因是负面的医疗保健经历阻碍了医疗保健的利用。医疗服务提供者肯定的做法可以减轻这种痛苦,但建立这些技能的医学教育是有限的。医学模拟提供了加强确认沟通的机会,但缺乏支持TGD标准化患者(SPs)的最佳实践。目的:本研究旨在制定TGD SPs的招募,描述和支持的初步指南。设计:我们利用改进的德尔菲技术来确定医学模拟程序的共识指南,将TGD个体作为模拟场景中的标准化参与者。参与者:田纳西州中部50名TGD社区成员和TGD儿童的家长提供了具体的知识。方法:我们进行了一项调查,检查参与者对医学模拟中TGD SPs的招聘、铸造和支持的观点。专题分析用于得出指南声明,并利用参与者在另外两轮调查中的反馈对其进行了改进。主要结果:我们的样本包括50名参与者(96% TGD)。我们得出了44条与招募、铸造和支持TGD SPs相关的指导声明。与会者建议通过与TGD社区建立信任关系的既定场所招募潜在的TGD SPs,诚实地传达这项工作的优点和缺点。根据模拟患者的性别认同,出现了可接受的角色决定梯度,以确保SP和他们的角色之间共享生活经历。在模拟过程中,参与者提出了增强志愿者代理能力、促进心理安全、处理情绪的策略,以提高志愿者对模拟项目的支持。结论:我们利用改进的德尔福技术与TGD社区成员一起得出了支持TGD SPs的共识指南。我们的研究解决了文献中未解决的关键问题,特别是在招聘和选角方面,具有高度的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community-Engaged Qualitative Study on Supporting Transgender and Gender-Diverse Standardized Patients in Medical Simulation.

Background: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals experience high rates of adverse physical and mental health outcomes, in part due to negative healthcare experiences that discourage healthcare utilization. Affirming practices by providers can mitigate this distress, but medical education to build these skills is limited. Medical simulation offers an opportunity to enhance affirming communication, but best practices in supporting TGD standardized patients (SPs) are lacking.

Objective: This study sought to develop a preliminary guideline on recruitment, portrayal, and support of TGD SPs.

Design: We utilized a modified Delphi technique to identify consensus guidelines for medical simulation programs incorporating TGD individuals as standardized actors in simulation scenarios.

Participants: Fifty TGD community members and parents of TGD children in Middle Tennessee provided embodied knowledge.

Approach: We administered a survey examining participants' perspectives on recruitment, casting, and supporting TGD SPs in medical simulations. Thematic analysis was used to derive guideline statements, which were refined using participant feedback over two additional survey rounds.

Key results: Our sample consisted of 50 participants (96% TGD). We derived 44 guideline statements related to recruitment, casting, and supporting TGD SPs. Participants recommended recruitment of prospective TGD SPs through established venues holding trusted relationships with the TGD community, honestly conveying the benefits and drawbacks of this work. A gradient of acceptable casting decisions emerged, anchored by the gender identity of the simulated patient, to ensure shared lived experiences between an SP and their cast role. Participants offered strategies throughout simulation encounters to enhance TGD SPs' agency, facilitate psychological safety, and process emotions to improve simulation programs' support of TGD SPs.

Conclusions: We utilized a modified Delphi technique with TGD community members to derive a consensus guideline to support TGD SPs. Our study addressed key unresolved questions in the literature, particularly around recruitment and casting, with a high level of agreement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信