护理一致性与养老院护理偏好:一项预先护理计划程序(BEVOR)效果的集群随机研究。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kornelia Götze, Claudia Bausewein, Nadezda Chernyak, Berend Feddersen, Angela Fuchs, Eva Hummers, Andrea Icks, Änne Kirchner, Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Nicola Kranefeld, Sonja Laag, Susanne Lezius, Gabriele Meyer, Joseph Montalbo, Friedemann Nauck, Amra Pepić, Susanne Przybylla, Irina Rosu, Jan Schildmann, Michaela Schunk, Henrikje Stanze, Andreas Stöhr, Nancy Thilo, Christiane Vogel, Antonia Zapf, Georg Marckmann, Jürgen in der Schmitten
{"title":"护理一致性与养老院护理偏好:一项预先护理计划程序(BEVOR)效果的集群随机研究。","authors":"Kornelia Götze, Claudia Bausewein, Nadezda Chernyak, Berend Feddersen, Angela Fuchs, Eva Hummers, Andrea Icks, Änne Kirchner, Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Nicola Kranefeld, Sonja Laag, Susanne Lezius, Gabriele Meyer, Joseph Montalbo, Friedemann Nauck, Amra Pepić, Susanne Przybylla, Irina Rosu, Jan Schildmann, Michaela Schunk, Henrikje Stanze, Andreas Stöhr, Nancy Thilo, Christiane Vogel, Antonia Zapf, Georg Marckmann, Jürgen in der Schmitten","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study (NCT04333303), we investigated whether a complex advance care planning (ACP) intervention improves care consistency with care preferences in nursing home residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four German nursing homes were randomly assigned to an ACP intervention addressing the individual, institutional, and regional levels or to a control group (no intervention). The hospitalization rate over an observation period of 12 months (primary outcome) was analyzed as a surrogate for care consistency with care preferences at the nursing home level. Secondary outcomes comprised process-related and clinical parameters, including care consistency with care preferences (analysis level: residents/ nursing homes). Outcomes were evaluated by means of Poisson and logistic regression models with incidence rate ratios (IRR) and odds ratios (OR) as effect estimators in an intention-to-treat analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 44 nursing homes, 23 received the intervention. The hospitalization rate did not differ between the two groups (IRR 1.0; 95% CI: [0.97; 1.1]) but declined to a similar extent in both during the COVID-19 pandemic. The consistency of care with care preferences was similar in both groups as well (OR 0.9 [0.4; 1.9]). The predefined exploratory analysis suggests that care consistency with care preferences was more likely in the 6 out of 23 nursing homes that met predefined adherence criteria (OR 1.9 [0.7; 5.3]). Written emergency plans were significantly more common in the intervention group (IRR 11.6 [8.2; 16.4]), and even more so in adherent nursing homes (IRR 30.1 [15.7; 57.6]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention did not permeate sufficiently, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic that may, in addition, have masked intrinsic shortcomings of the intervention. Thus, this trial does not allow a conclusive assessment of whether or not the intervention can promote care consistency with care preferences. However, exploratory analyses indicate that successful institutional implementation in conjunction with individual ACP conversations may increase care consistency with care preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care Consistency With Care Preferences in Nursing Homes: A Cluster-Randomized Study of the Effects of an Advance Care Planning Program (BEVOR).\",\"authors\":\"Kornelia Götze, Claudia Bausewein, Nadezda Chernyak, Berend Feddersen, Angela Fuchs, Eva Hummers, Andrea Icks, Änne Kirchner, Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Nicola Kranefeld, Sonja Laag, Susanne Lezius, Gabriele Meyer, Joseph Montalbo, Friedemann Nauck, Amra Pepić, Susanne Przybylla, Irina Rosu, Jan Schildmann, Michaela Schunk, Henrikje Stanze, Andreas Stöhr, Nancy Thilo, Christiane Vogel, Antonia Zapf, Georg Marckmann, Jürgen in der Schmitten\",\"doi\":\"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study (NCT04333303), we investigated whether a complex advance care planning (ACP) intervention improves care consistency with care preferences in nursing home residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four German nursing homes were randomly assigned to an ACP intervention addressing the individual, institutional, and regional levels or to a control group (no intervention). The hospitalization rate over an observation period of 12 months (primary outcome) was analyzed as a surrogate for care consistency with care preferences at the nursing home level. Secondary outcomes comprised process-related and clinical parameters, including care consistency with care preferences (analysis level: residents/ nursing homes). Outcomes were evaluated by means of Poisson and logistic regression models with incidence rate ratios (IRR) and odds ratios (OR) as effect estimators in an intention-to-treat analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 44 nursing homes, 23 received the intervention. The hospitalization rate did not differ between the two groups (IRR 1.0; 95% CI: [0.97; 1.1]) but declined to a similar extent in both during the COVID-19 pandemic. The consistency of care with care preferences was similar in both groups as well (OR 0.9 [0.4; 1.9]). The predefined exploratory analysis suggests that care consistency with care preferences was more likely in the 6 out of 23 nursing homes that met predefined adherence criteria (OR 1.9 [0.7; 5.3]). Written emergency plans were significantly more common in the intervention group (IRR 11.6 [8.2; 16.4]), and even more so in adherent nursing homes (IRR 30.1 [15.7; 57.6]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention did not permeate sufficiently, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic that may, in addition, have masked intrinsic shortcomings of the intervention. Thus, this trial does not allow a conclusive assessment of whether or not the intervention can promote care consistency with care preferences. However, exploratory analyses indicate that successful institutional implementation in conjunction with individual ACP conversations may increase care consistency with care preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"volume\":\" Forthcoming\",\"pages\":\"379-386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在本研究(NCT04333303)中,我们调查了复杂的预先护理计划(ACP)干预是否能改善养老院居民与护理偏好的护理一致性。方法:44家德国养老院被随机分配到针对个人、机构和地区水平的ACP干预组或对照组(不干预)。在12个月的观察期(主要结果)住院率被分析作为护理一致性与护理偏好在养老院水平的替代。次要结果包括过程相关参数和临床参数,包括护理与护理偏好的一致性(分析水平:居民/养老院)。结果通过泊松和逻辑回归模型进行评估,发生率比(IRR)和优势比(OR)作为意向治疗分析中的效果估计。结果:44家养老院中,23家接受了干预。两组住院率差异无统计学意义(IRR 1.0;95% ci: [0.97;[1.1]),但在COVID-19大流行期间,两者的下降幅度相似。护理与护理偏好的一致性在两组中也相似(OR为0.9 [0.4;1.9])。预先设定的探索性分析表明,在23个疗养院中,有6个疗养院符合预先设定的依从性标准(OR 1.9 [0.7;5.3])。书面应急计划在干预组中更为常见(IRR为11.6 [8.2;16.4]),在附属疗养院中更是如此(IRR 30.1 [15.7;57.6])。结论:干预措施渗透不够充分,特别是COVID-19大流行可能掩盖了干预措施的内在缺陷。因此,本试验不允许对干预是否能促进护理一致性与护理偏好进行结论性评估。然而,探索性分析表明,成功的制度实施与个人ACP对话可能会增加护理与护理偏好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Care Consistency With Care Preferences in Nursing Homes: A Cluster-Randomized Study of the Effects of an Advance Care Planning Program (BEVOR).

Background: In this study (NCT04333303), we investigated whether a complex advance care planning (ACP) intervention improves care consistency with care preferences in nursing home residents.

Methods: Forty-four German nursing homes were randomly assigned to an ACP intervention addressing the individual, institutional, and regional levels or to a control group (no intervention). The hospitalization rate over an observation period of 12 months (primary outcome) was analyzed as a surrogate for care consistency with care preferences at the nursing home level. Secondary outcomes comprised process-related and clinical parameters, including care consistency with care preferences (analysis level: residents/ nursing homes). Outcomes were evaluated by means of Poisson and logistic regression models with incidence rate ratios (IRR) and odds ratios (OR) as effect estimators in an intention-to-treat analysis.

Results: Of 44 nursing homes, 23 received the intervention. The hospitalization rate did not differ between the two groups (IRR 1.0; 95% CI: [0.97; 1.1]) but declined to a similar extent in both during the COVID-19 pandemic. The consistency of care with care preferences was similar in both groups as well (OR 0.9 [0.4; 1.9]). The predefined exploratory analysis suggests that care consistency with care preferences was more likely in the 6 out of 23 nursing homes that met predefined adherence criteria (OR 1.9 [0.7; 5.3]). Written emergency plans were significantly more common in the intervention group (IRR 11.6 [8.2; 16.4]), and even more so in adherent nursing homes (IRR 30.1 [15.7; 57.6]).

Conclusion: The intervention did not permeate sufficiently, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic that may, in addition, have masked intrinsic shortcomings of the intervention. Thus, this trial does not allow a conclusive assessment of whether or not the intervention can promote care consistency with care preferences. However, exploratory analyses indicate that successful institutional implementation in conjunction with individual ACP conversations may increase care consistency with care preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信