用于评估临床登记的新兴经济证据和方法:系统的范围审查方案。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kalpa Pisavadia, Ned Hartfiel, Limssy Varghese, Anne Krayer, Gemma Hobson, Rebecca Masters, Rob Poole, Catherine Robinson, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Emily Bebbington
{"title":"用于评估临床登记的新兴经济证据和方法:系统的范围审查方案。","authors":"Kalpa Pisavadia, Ned Hartfiel, Limssy Varghese, Anne Krayer, Gemma Hobson, Rebecca Masters, Rob Poole, Catherine Robinson, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Emily Bebbington","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A clinical registry is a systematically collected database of health-specific information about a patient population. Clinical registries can be used for a variety of purposes including surveillance, monitoring of outcomes and patient care. The establishment and maintenance of clinical registries come with a significant cost. This scoping review aims to identify the methods used to economically evaluate clinical registries including their costs and benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic scoping review protocol has been developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The final review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and The Cumulative Index to Allied Health Literature(CINAHL) database will be searched. Relevant national organisation websites will be searched to identify empirical studies within grey literature. The inclusion criteria include studies that economically evaluate clinical registries and are published in the English language from inception to February 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen 100% of titles and abstracts and full texts of studies for inclusion. Data will be extracted from eligible studies prior to being assessed for quality using a multi-tool approach.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The findings of this review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. They are likely to be of interest to custodians of existing clinical registries and to those wishing to establish or evaluate clinical registries.<b>Keywords</b>Clinical registries, economic evaluation, costs, cost-effectiveness, health economics, registry based studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 6","pages":"e100644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The emerging economic evidence and methods used to evaluate clinical registries: a systematic scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Kalpa Pisavadia, Ned Hartfiel, Limssy Varghese, Anne Krayer, Gemma Hobson, Rebecca Masters, Rob Poole, Catherine Robinson, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Emily Bebbington\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A clinical registry is a systematically collected database of health-specific information about a patient population. Clinical registries can be used for a variety of purposes including surveillance, monitoring of outcomes and patient care. The establishment and maintenance of clinical registries come with a significant cost. This scoping review aims to identify the methods used to economically evaluate clinical registries including their costs and benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic scoping review protocol has been developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The final review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and The Cumulative Index to Allied Health Literature(CINAHL) database will be searched. Relevant national organisation websites will be searched to identify empirical studies within grey literature. The inclusion criteria include studies that economically evaluate clinical registries and are published in the English language from inception to February 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen 100% of titles and abstracts and full texts of studies for inclusion. Data will be extracted from eligible studies prior to being assessed for quality using a multi-tool approach.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The findings of this review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. They are likely to be of interest to custodians of existing clinical registries and to those wishing to establish or evaluate clinical registries.<b>Keywords</b>Clinical registries, economic evaluation, costs, cost-effectiveness, health economics, registry based studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"e100644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100644\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:临床登记是系统地收集有关患者群体的健康特定信息的数据库。临床登记可用于多种目的,包括监测、监测结果和患者护理。建立和维护临床登记需要大量的费用。本综述旨在确定用于经济评估临床登记的方法,包括其成本和收益。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南制定了本系统范围评价方案。最终评审将按照系统评审和荟萃分析扩展范围评审的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)清单进行报告。检索电子数据库Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library和The Cumulative Index to Allied Health Literature(CINAHL)数据库。将搜索相关的国家组织网站,以确定灰色文献中的实证研究。纳入标准包括从开始到2025年2月以英语发表的经济评估临床登记的研究。两名审稿人将独立筛选100%的研究标题、摘要和全文。在使用多工具方法评估质量之前,将从符合条件的研究中提取数据。伦理与传播:本综述的结果将发表在国际同行评议期刊上。现有临床登记的保管人以及希望建立或评估临床登记的人可能会对它们感兴趣。关键词临床登记,经济评价,成本,成本-效果,卫生经济学,基于登记的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The emerging economic evidence and methods used to evaluate clinical registries: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Introduction: A clinical registry is a systematically collected database of health-specific information about a patient population. Clinical registries can be used for a variety of purposes including surveillance, monitoring of outcomes and patient care. The establishment and maintenance of clinical registries come with a significant cost. This scoping review aims to identify the methods used to economically evaluate clinical registries including their costs and benefits.

Methods: This systematic scoping review protocol has been developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The final review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and The Cumulative Index to Allied Health Literature(CINAHL) database will be searched. Relevant national organisation websites will be searched to identify empirical studies within grey literature. The inclusion criteria include studies that economically evaluate clinical registries and are published in the English language from inception to February 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen 100% of titles and abstracts and full texts of studies for inclusion. Data will be extracted from eligible studies prior to being assessed for quality using a multi-tool approach.

Ethics and dissemination: The findings of this review will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. They are likely to be of interest to custodians of existing clinical registries and to those wishing to establish or evaluate clinical registries.KeywordsClinical registries, economic evaluation, costs, cost-effectiveness, health economics, registry based studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信