来自化石足迹的速度:未被现有鸟类在柔顺基质上验证的计算。

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Biology Letters Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2025.0191
Tash L Prescott, Benjamin W Griffin, Oliver E Demuth, Stephen M Gatesy, Jens N Lallensack, Peter L Falkingham
{"title":"来自化石足迹的速度:未被现有鸟类在柔顺基质上验证的计算。","authors":"Tash L Prescott, Benjamin W Griffin, Oliver E Demuth, Stephen M Gatesy, Jens N Lallensack, Peter L Falkingham","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2025.0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fossil trackways serve as a valuable tool in understanding the behaviour and locomotion of extinct animals. Calculating speeds from trackways has become a standard approach, particularly for dinosaurs. However, the original equation was derived from predominantly mammalian data. There have been few validation studies using modern birds, the descendants of theropod dinosaurs. We used high-speed video recordings of two helmeted guineafowl (<i>Numida meleagris</i>) traversing mud of varying consistency. Associated trackways were digitized using photogrammetry, and stride and track lengths were measured to calculate speed. The speed calculated from trackways was higher than the measured speed for multiple speed formulae. Within-trackway stride lengths were variable, even when speed was relatively constant, but there were cases where two identical stride lengths were produced by birds moving at very different speeds. Prior work of guineafowl locomoting on a treadmill found good correspondence between measured speed and speed calculated from stride length. We attribute the discrepancy seen in our data between measured and calculated speed as resulting from non-steady state locomotion on compliant substrates. Given that tracks require compliant substrates to form, and are made by free-moving individuals, our data indicate that speed estimates from trackways are inaccurate, if not outright misleading.</p>","PeriodicalId":9005,"journal":{"name":"Biology Letters","volume":"21 6","pages":"20250191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speed from fossil trackways: calculations not validated by extant birds on compliant substrates.\",\"authors\":\"Tash L Prescott, Benjamin W Griffin, Oliver E Demuth, Stephen M Gatesy, Jens N Lallensack, Peter L Falkingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsbl.2025.0191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fossil trackways serve as a valuable tool in understanding the behaviour and locomotion of extinct animals. Calculating speeds from trackways has become a standard approach, particularly for dinosaurs. However, the original equation was derived from predominantly mammalian data. There have been few validation studies using modern birds, the descendants of theropod dinosaurs. We used high-speed video recordings of two helmeted guineafowl (<i>Numida meleagris</i>) traversing mud of varying consistency. Associated trackways were digitized using photogrammetry, and stride and track lengths were measured to calculate speed. The speed calculated from trackways was higher than the measured speed for multiple speed formulae. Within-trackway stride lengths were variable, even when speed was relatively constant, but there were cases where two identical stride lengths were produced by birds moving at very different speeds. Prior work of guineafowl locomoting on a treadmill found good correspondence between measured speed and speed calculated from stride length. We attribute the discrepancy seen in our data between measured and calculated speed as resulting from non-steady state locomotion on compliant substrates. Given that tracks require compliant substrates to form, and are made by free-moving individuals, our data indicate that speed estimates from trackways are inaccurate, if not outright misleading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Letters\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"20250191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2025.0191\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2025.0191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化石足迹是了解灭绝动物行为和运动的宝贵工具。从轨道上计算速度已经成为一种标准方法,尤其是对恐龙来说。然而,原始方程主要来自哺乳动物的数据。很少有使用现代鸟类(兽脚亚目恐龙的后代)进行验证的研究。我们使用高速录像记录了两只盔珍珠鸡(Numida meleagris)穿越不同稠度的泥浆。使用摄影测量技术对相关轨道进行数字化,并测量步幅和轨道长度以计算速度。在多速度公式中,轨道计算速度高于实测速度。即使在速度相对恒定的情况下,轨道内的步幅也是可变的,但在某些情况下,以不同速度移动的鸟类会产生两个相同的步幅。先前对珍珠鸡在跑步机上运动的研究发现,测量的速度和从步幅计算的速度之间有很好的对应关系。我们将数据中测量和计算速度之间的差异归因于在柔性基底上的非稳态运动。考虑到轨道需要兼容的基材形成,并且是由自由移动的个体制造的,我们的数据表明,轨道的速度估计是不准确的,如果不是完全误导的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speed from fossil trackways: calculations not validated by extant birds on compliant substrates.

Fossil trackways serve as a valuable tool in understanding the behaviour and locomotion of extinct animals. Calculating speeds from trackways has become a standard approach, particularly for dinosaurs. However, the original equation was derived from predominantly mammalian data. There have been few validation studies using modern birds, the descendants of theropod dinosaurs. We used high-speed video recordings of two helmeted guineafowl (Numida meleagris) traversing mud of varying consistency. Associated trackways were digitized using photogrammetry, and stride and track lengths were measured to calculate speed. The speed calculated from trackways was higher than the measured speed for multiple speed formulae. Within-trackway stride lengths were variable, even when speed was relatively constant, but there were cases where two identical stride lengths were produced by birds moving at very different speeds. Prior work of guineafowl locomoting on a treadmill found good correspondence between measured speed and speed calculated from stride length. We attribute the discrepancy seen in our data between measured and calculated speed as resulting from non-steady state locomotion on compliant substrates. Given that tracks require compliant substrates to form, and are made by free-moving individuals, our data indicate that speed estimates from trackways are inaccurate, if not outright misleading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Letters
Biology Letters 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Previously a supplement to Proceedings B, and launched as an independent journal in 2005, Biology Letters is a primarily online, peer-reviewed journal that publishes short, high-quality articles, reviews and opinion pieces from across the biological sciences. The scope of Biology Letters is vast - publishing high-quality research in any area of the biological sciences. However, we have particular strengths in the biology, evolution and ecology of whole organisms. We also publish in other areas of biology, such as molecular ecology and evolution, environmental science, and phylogenetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信