6项半月板检查的临床可靠性:255例患者的诊断准确性研究

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Lorenzo Lucchetta, Giulio Ancillai, Francesco Manfreda, Paolo Ceccarini, Auro Caraffa
{"title":"6项半月板检查的临床可靠性:255例患者的诊断准确性研究","authors":"Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Lorenzo Lucchetta, Giulio Ancillai, Francesco Manfreda, Paolo Ceccarini, Auro Caraffa","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.43906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and purpose - We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 clinical tests for meniscal tears comparing them with MRI and arthroscopy in a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> 255 patients (20-45 years) with knee trauma were examined by 2 orthopedic surgeons blinded to the patient's history, MRI result, and the first clinical examination. The clinical tests (Joint Line Tenderness, McMurray, Apley, Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion) were conducted between 5 and 7 days post-injury (T1) and 4-5 weeks post-injury (T2). Diagnostic accuracy was determined based on MRI and arthroscopic findings, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Arthroscopy confirmed 188 meniscal tears. The McMurray demonstrated the most balanced performance, with sensitivity of 91% at T1 to 80% at T2 with specificity increase from 55% to 79% showing the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% at T2. Combining McMurray and Apley yielded the best accuracy minimizing false positive. McMurray and Hyper-flexion were more sensitive to medial chondropathy; Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion were more influenced by anterior knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No single clinical test was sufficiently reliable for independent diagnosis, reinforcing the need for MRI confirmation and further refinement of clinical evaluation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"452-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical reliability of 6 meniscal tests: a diagnostic accuracy study of 255 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Lorenzo Lucchetta, Giulio Ancillai, Francesco Manfreda, Paolo Ceccarini, Auro Caraffa\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.43906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background and purpose - We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 clinical tests for meniscal tears comparing them with MRI and arthroscopy in a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> 255 patients (20-45 years) with knee trauma were examined by 2 orthopedic surgeons blinded to the patient's history, MRI result, and the first clinical examination. The clinical tests (Joint Line Tenderness, McMurray, Apley, Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion) were conducted between 5 and 7 days post-injury (T1) and 4-5 weeks post-injury (T2). Diagnostic accuracy was determined based on MRI and arthroscopic findings, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Arthroscopy confirmed 188 meniscal tears. The McMurray demonstrated the most balanced performance, with sensitivity of 91% at T1 to 80% at T2 with specificity increase from 55% to 79% showing the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% at T2. Combining McMurray and Apley yielded the best accuracy minimizing false positive. McMurray and Hyper-flexion were more sensitive to medial chondropathy; Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion were more influenced by anterior knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No single clinical test was sufficiently reliable for independent diagnosis, reinforcing the need for MRI confirmation and further refinement of clinical evaluation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"452-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43906\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43906","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在一项横断面研究中,我们旨在评估6项半月板撕裂的临床检查的诊断准确性,并将其与MRI和关节镜检查进行比较。方法:255例(20-45岁)膝关节外伤患者,由2名骨科医生对患者的病史、MRI结果和首次临床检查不知情进行检查。临床试验(关节线压痛、McMurray、Apley、Thessaly、Ege和过度屈曲)在损伤后5 - 7天(T1)和损伤后4-5周(T2)进行。诊断的准确性基于MRI和关节镜检查结果,评估敏感性、特异性和预测值。结果:关节镜确诊半月板撕裂188例。McMurray表现出最平衡的表现,T1时的灵敏度为91%,T2时为80%,特异性从55%增加到79%,T2时的最高阳性预测值(PPV)为92%。结合McMurray和Apley产生了最好的准确性,最大限度地减少了假阳性。McMurray和Hyper-flexion对内侧软骨病变更敏感;Thessaly, Ege和过度屈曲更受膝关节前侧疼痛的影响。结论:没有单一的临床检查足以独立诊断,因此需要MRI确认和进一步完善临床评估策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical reliability of 6 meniscal tests: a diagnostic accuracy study of 255 patients.

Background and purpose - We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 clinical tests for meniscal tears comparing them with MRI and arthroscopy in a cross-sectional study.

Methods:  255 patients (20-45 years) with knee trauma were examined by 2 orthopedic surgeons blinded to the patient's history, MRI result, and the first clinical examination. The clinical tests (Joint Line Tenderness, McMurray, Apley, Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion) were conducted between 5 and 7 days post-injury (T1) and 4-5 weeks post-injury (T2). Diagnostic accuracy was determined based on MRI and arthroscopic findings, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.

Results:  Arthroscopy confirmed 188 meniscal tears. The McMurray demonstrated the most balanced performance, with sensitivity of 91% at T1 to 80% at T2 with specificity increase from 55% to 79% showing the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% at T2. Combining McMurray and Apley yielded the best accuracy minimizing false positive. McMurray and Hyper-flexion were more sensitive to medial chondropathy; Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion were more influenced by anterior knee pain.

Conclusion: No single clinical test was sufficiently reliable for independent diagnosis, reinforcing the need for MRI confirmation and further refinement of clinical evaluation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信