Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Lorenzo Lucchetta, Giulio Ancillai, Francesco Manfreda, Paolo Ceccarini, Auro Caraffa
{"title":"6项半月板检查的临床可靠性:255例患者的诊断准确性研究","authors":"Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Lorenzo Lucchetta, Giulio Ancillai, Francesco Manfreda, Paolo Ceccarini, Auro Caraffa","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.43906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and purpose - We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 clinical tests for meniscal tears comparing them with MRI and arthroscopy in a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> 255 patients (20-45 years) with knee trauma were examined by 2 orthopedic surgeons blinded to the patient's history, MRI result, and the first clinical examination. The clinical tests (Joint Line Tenderness, McMurray, Apley, Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion) were conducted between 5 and 7 days post-injury (T1) and 4-5 weeks post-injury (T2). Diagnostic accuracy was determined based on MRI and arthroscopic findings, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Arthroscopy confirmed 188 meniscal tears. The McMurray demonstrated the most balanced performance, with sensitivity of 91% at T1 to 80% at T2 with specificity increase from 55% to 79% showing the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% at T2. Combining McMurray and Apley yielded the best accuracy minimizing false positive. McMurray and Hyper-flexion were more sensitive to medial chondropathy; Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion were more influenced by anterior knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No single clinical test was sufficiently reliable for independent diagnosis, reinforcing the need for MRI confirmation and further refinement of clinical evaluation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"452-458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical reliability of 6 meniscal tests: a diagnostic accuracy study of 255 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Lorenzo Lucchetta, Giulio Ancillai, Francesco Manfreda, Paolo Ceccarini, Auro Caraffa\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2025.43906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background and purpose - We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 clinical tests for meniscal tears comparing them with MRI and arthroscopy in a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> 255 patients (20-45 years) with knee trauma were examined by 2 orthopedic surgeons blinded to the patient's history, MRI result, and the first clinical examination. The clinical tests (Joint Line Tenderness, McMurray, Apley, Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion) were conducted between 5 and 7 days post-injury (T1) and 4-5 weeks post-injury (T2). Diagnostic accuracy was determined based on MRI and arthroscopic findings, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Arthroscopy confirmed 188 meniscal tears. The McMurray demonstrated the most balanced performance, with sensitivity of 91% at T1 to 80% at T2 with specificity increase from 55% to 79% showing the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% at T2. Combining McMurray and Apley yielded the best accuracy minimizing false positive. McMurray and Hyper-flexion were more sensitive to medial chondropathy; Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion were more influenced by anterior knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No single clinical test was sufficiently reliable for independent diagnosis, reinforcing the need for MRI confirmation and further refinement of clinical evaluation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"452-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43906\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43906","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical reliability of 6 meniscal tests: a diagnostic accuracy study of 255 patients.
Background and purpose - We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 clinical tests for meniscal tears comparing them with MRI and arthroscopy in a cross-sectional study.
Methods: 255 patients (20-45 years) with knee trauma were examined by 2 orthopedic surgeons blinded to the patient's history, MRI result, and the first clinical examination. The clinical tests (Joint Line Tenderness, McMurray, Apley, Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion) were conducted between 5 and 7 days post-injury (T1) and 4-5 weeks post-injury (T2). Diagnostic accuracy was determined based on MRI and arthroscopic findings, evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
Results: Arthroscopy confirmed 188 meniscal tears. The McMurray demonstrated the most balanced performance, with sensitivity of 91% at T1 to 80% at T2 with specificity increase from 55% to 79% showing the highest positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% at T2. Combining McMurray and Apley yielded the best accuracy minimizing false positive. McMurray and Hyper-flexion were more sensitive to medial chondropathy; Thessaly, Ege, and Hyper-flexion were more influenced by anterior knee pain.
Conclusion: No single clinical test was sufficiently reliable for independent diagnosis, reinforcing the need for MRI confirmation and further refinement of clinical evaluation strategies.
期刊介绍:
Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.