病人数量要求:评估2025年ACGME建议急诊医学住院医师计划

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Carlisle E. W. Topping, Craig Rothenberg, Cameron J. Gettel, Rohit B. Sangal, Katja Goldflam, Andrew Ulrich, Pooja Agrawal, D. Mark Courtney, Arjun K. Venkatesh
{"title":"病人数量要求:评估2025年ACGME建议急诊医学住院医师计划","authors":"Carlisle E. W. Topping,&nbsp;Craig Rothenberg,&nbsp;Cameron J. Gettel,&nbsp;Rohit B. Sangal,&nbsp;Katja Goldflam,&nbsp;Andrew Ulrich,&nbsp;Pooja Agrawal,&nbsp;D. Mark Courtney,&nbsp;Arjun K. Venkatesh","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The 2025 ACGME proposed that all EM residency programs must be 4 years and achieve a minimum of 3000 patients per resident. We characterize the current residency program patient volume per resident based on the proposed requirements. Secondarily, we describe the number of programs that meet the proposed visit volume requirement and the estimated impact of the 4-year length mandate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing a linked dataset of the 2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and 2025 EM program information from ACGME's website. Hospital zip codes were linked with Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. We calculated the estimated residency program patient volume per resident as proposed by ACGME. Secondarily, we calculated the estimated change in patient volume if 3-year programs converted to 4 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 286 programs, the median program patient volume was 7300 (IQR: 5190–10,207). Among the 232 (81%) 3-year programs, the median volume was 7616 (IQR: 5292–10,639), while the 54 (19%) 4-year programs demonstrated a median of 6520 (IQR: 4930–9304). Rural programs (3%) had a median patient volume of 7744 (IQR: 5453–13,209), compared to 7300 (IQR: 5190–10,207) for urban programs (97%). Nine programs (3%) were below the 3000-patient volume threshold; 7 of these were 3-year programs, and transitioning to 4 years could bring 6 above the threshold.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Currently, 97% of EM programs meet the proposed 3000-patient volume threshold, with a median volume well over double this value and similar volumes across program lengths and rurality. Transitioning from 3 to 4 years may enable all but one current 3-year program to meet the new volume requirement. Therefore, the proposed ACGME changes may not increase the minimum required clinical exposure for EM residents as originally intended and should prompt re-examination.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Volume Requirements: Evaluation of the 2025 ACGME Proposal for Emergency Medicine Residency Programs\",\"authors\":\"Carlisle E. W. Topping,&nbsp;Craig Rothenberg,&nbsp;Cameron J. Gettel,&nbsp;Rohit B. Sangal,&nbsp;Katja Goldflam,&nbsp;Andrew Ulrich,&nbsp;Pooja Agrawal,&nbsp;D. Mark Courtney,&nbsp;Arjun K. Venkatesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The 2025 ACGME proposed that all EM residency programs must be 4 years and achieve a minimum of 3000 patients per resident. We characterize the current residency program patient volume per resident based on the proposed requirements. Secondarily, we describe the number of programs that meet the proposed visit volume requirement and the estimated impact of the 4-year length mandate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing a linked dataset of the 2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and 2025 EM program information from ACGME's website. Hospital zip codes were linked with Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. We calculated the estimated residency program patient volume per resident as proposed by ACGME. Secondarily, we calculated the estimated change in patient volume if 3-year programs converted to 4 years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 286 programs, the median program patient volume was 7300 (IQR: 5190–10,207). Among the 232 (81%) 3-year programs, the median volume was 7616 (IQR: 5292–10,639), while the 54 (19%) 4-year programs demonstrated a median of 6520 (IQR: 4930–9304). Rural programs (3%) had a median patient volume of 7744 (IQR: 5453–13,209), compared to 7300 (IQR: 5190–10,207) for urban programs (97%). Nine programs (3%) were below the 3000-patient volume threshold; 7 of these were 3-year programs, and transitioning to 4 years could bring 6 above the threshold.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Currently, 97% of EM programs meet the proposed 3000-patient volume threshold, with a median volume well over double this value and similar volumes across program lengths and rurality. Transitioning from 3 to 4 years may enable all but one current 3-year program to meet the new volume requirement. Therefore, the proposed ACGME changes may not increase the minimum required clinical exposure for EM residents as originally intended and should prompt re-examination.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2025年ACGME建议所有EM住院医师项目必须为4年,每位住院医师至少接待3000名患者。我们根据提出的要求描述当前住院医师计划的每位住院医师的患者数量。其次,我们描述了满足拟议访问量要求的项目数量和4年授权的估计影响。方法:利用2023年美国医院协会年度调查的关联数据集和ACGME网站上的2025年EM计划信息进行了横断面分析。医院的邮政编码与城乡通勤区号相关联。我们根据ACGME的建议计算了住院医师项目中每位住院医师的估计患者数量。其次,我们计算了如果将3年计划转换为4年,患者数量的估计变化。结果在286个项目中,中位项目患者数量为7300人(IQR: 5190-10,207)。在232个(81%)3年制课程中,中位数为7616 (IQR: 5292-10,639),而54个(19%)4年制课程的中位数为6520 (IQR: 4930-9304)。农村项目(3%)的中位患者量为7744 (IQR: 5453 - 13209),而城市项目(97%)的中位患者量为7300 (IQR: 5190-10,207)。9个项目(3%)低于3000例患者的容量阈值;其中7个是3年的项目,过渡到4年可能会使6个超过门槛。目前,97%的EM项目达到了建议的3000患者容量阈值,中位容量远远超过了该值的两倍,并且项目长度和农村地区的容量相似。从3年到4年的过渡可能会使所有目前的3年计划满足新的数量要求。因此,拟议的ACGME变更可能不会像最初预期的那样增加EM居民的最低临床暴露要求,并且应该促使重新检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Volume Requirements: Evaluation of the 2025 ACGME Proposal for Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

Objectives

The 2025 ACGME proposed that all EM residency programs must be 4 years and achieve a minimum of 3000 patients per resident. We characterize the current residency program patient volume per resident based on the proposed requirements. Secondarily, we describe the number of programs that meet the proposed visit volume requirement and the estimated impact of the 4-year length mandate.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing a linked dataset of the 2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and 2025 EM program information from ACGME's website. Hospital zip codes were linked with Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. We calculated the estimated residency program patient volume per resident as proposed by ACGME. Secondarily, we calculated the estimated change in patient volume if 3-year programs converted to 4 years.

Results

Of 286 programs, the median program patient volume was 7300 (IQR: 5190–10,207). Among the 232 (81%) 3-year programs, the median volume was 7616 (IQR: 5292–10,639), while the 54 (19%) 4-year programs demonstrated a median of 6520 (IQR: 4930–9304). Rural programs (3%) had a median patient volume of 7744 (IQR: 5453–13,209), compared to 7300 (IQR: 5190–10,207) for urban programs (97%). Nine programs (3%) were below the 3000-patient volume threshold; 7 of these were 3-year programs, and transitioning to 4 years could bring 6 above the threshold.

Conclusions

Currently, 97% of EM programs meet the proposed 3000-patient volume threshold, with a median volume well over double this value and similar volumes across program lengths and rurality. Transitioning from 3 to 4 years may enable all but one current 3-year program to meet the new volume requirement. Therefore, the proposed ACGME changes may not increase the minimum required clinical exposure for EM residents as originally intended and should prompt re-examination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信