爱因斯坦环中的透镜质量JWST-ER1

IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Fulvio Melia
{"title":"爱因斯坦环中的透镜质量JWST-ER1","authors":"Fulvio Melia","doi":"10.1002/asna.20240144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>JWST has made several surprising discoveries, underscored by the “too early” appearance of well-formed galaxies and supermassive black holes. It recently also uncovered a compact galaxy (JWST-ER1g) associated with a complete Einstein ring (JWST-ER1r) at photometric redshift <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>z</mi>\n <mi>l</mi>\n </msub>\n <msubsup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1.94</mn>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>0.17</mn>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mn>0.13</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {z}_l={1.94}_{-0.17}^{+0.13} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, produced by a lensed galaxy at <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>z</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n <msubsup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>2.98</mn>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>0.47</mn>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mn>0.42</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {z}_s={2.98}_{-0.47}^{+0.42} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. In two independent studies, this system (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mtext>lens</mtext>\n </msub>\n <mo>∼</mo>\n <mn>6.5</mn>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mn>11</mn>\n </msup>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <msub>\n <mi>M</mi>\n <mo>⊙</mo>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {M}_{\\mathrm{lens}}\\sim 6.5\\times {10}^{11}\\kern0.5em {M}_{\\odot } $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) has yielded different conclusions concerning whether or not it requires an unexpected contribution of mass from sources other than stars and fiducial dark matter. The different redshift inferred by these two analysis for the lensed galaxy appears to be the culprit. In this paper, we examine the impact of the background cosmology on our interpretation of the JWST data. We compare the measured characteristics of JWST-ER1 in flat-ΛCDM with those emerging in the context of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>h</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mi>ct</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\mathrm{h}}= ct $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. We show that, unlike the latter model's mitigation of the tension created by JWST's other discoveries, neither cosmology is favored by this particular Einstein ring. The disparity is common to both models, leaving open the question of whether a new type of mass, or a modified initial mass function, may be present in this source.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55442,"journal":{"name":"Astronomische Nachrichten","volume":"346 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lens Mass in the Einstein Ring JWST-ER1\",\"authors\":\"Fulvio Melia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asna.20240144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>JWST has made several surprising discoveries, underscored by the “too early” appearance of well-formed galaxies and supermassive black holes. It recently also uncovered a compact galaxy (JWST-ER1g) associated with a complete Einstein ring (JWST-ER1r) at photometric redshift <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>1.94</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>0.17</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n <mn>0.13</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {z}_l={1.94}_{-0.17}^{+0.13} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, produced by a lensed galaxy at <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>z</mi>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>2.98</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>0.47</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n <mn>0.42</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {z}_s={2.98}_{-0.47}^{+0.42} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. In two independent studies, this system (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>M</mi>\\n <mtext>lens</mtext>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>∼</mo>\\n <mn>6.5</mn>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>10</mn>\\n <mn>11</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>M</mi>\\n <mo>⊙</mo>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {M}_{\\\\mathrm{lens}}\\\\sim 6.5\\\\times {10}^{11}\\\\kern0.5em {M}_{\\\\odot } $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) has yielded different conclusions concerning whether or not it requires an unexpected contribution of mass from sources other than stars and fiducial dark matter. The different redshift inferred by these two analysis for the lensed galaxy appears to be the culprit. In this paper, we examine the impact of the background cosmology on our interpretation of the JWST data. We compare the measured characteristics of JWST-ER1 in flat-ΛCDM with those emerging in the context of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <mi>h</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mi>ct</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {R}_{\\\\mathrm{h}}= ct $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. We show that, unlike the latter model's mitigation of the tension created by JWST's other discoveries, neither cosmology is favored by this particular Einstein ring. The disparity is common to both models, leaving open the question of whether a new type of mass, or a modified initial mass function, may be present in this source.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomische Nachrichten\",\"volume\":\"346 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomische Nachrichten\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asna.20240144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomische Nachrichten","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asna.20240144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

JWST已经有了几个令人惊讶的发现,这些发现强调了形成良好的星系和超大质量黑洞的“过早”出现。它最近还发现了一个紧凑型星系(JWST-ER1g),它与一个完整的爱因斯坦环(JWST-ER1r)有关,光度红移zl = 1.94−0.17 +0.13 $$ {z}_l={1.94}_{-0.17}^{+0.13} $$,由一个透镜星系在z = 2.98−0.47 + 0.42产生$$ {z}_s={2.98}_{-0.47}^{+0.42} $$。在两项独立研究中,这个系统(M透镜~ 6.5 × 10 11 M⊙$$ {M}_{\mathrm{lens}}\sim 6.5\times {10}^{11}\kern0.5em {M}_{\odot } $$)已经得出了不同的结论,关于它是否需要一个来自恒星和基准暗物质以外的来源的意外质量贡献。这两种分析对透镜星系推断出的不同红移似乎是罪魁祸首。在本文中,我们研究了背景宇宙学对我们解释JWST数据的影响。我们比较了平面-ΛCDM中JWST-ER1的测量特征与R h = ct $$ {R}_{\mathrm{h}}= ct $$中出现的特征。我们的研究表明,与后一种模型对JWST其他发现所产生的张力的缓解不同,这两种宇宙学都不受这个特殊的爱因斯坦环的青睐。这两种模型的差异是共同的,这留下了一个问题,即在这个源中是否存在一种新的质量类型,或者一个修改过的初始质量函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Lens Mass in the Einstein Ring JWST-ER1

JWST has made several surprising discoveries, underscored by the “too early” appearance of well-formed galaxies and supermassive black holes. It recently also uncovered a compact galaxy (JWST-ER1g) associated with a complete Einstein ring (JWST-ER1r) at photometric redshift z l = 1.94 0.17 + 0.13 $$ {z}_l={1.94}_{-0.17}^{+0.13} $$ , produced by a lensed galaxy at z s = 2.98 0.47 + 0.42 $$ {z}_s={2.98}_{-0.47}^{+0.42} $$ . In two independent studies, this system ( M lens 6.5 × 10 11 M $$ {M}_{\mathrm{lens}}\sim 6.5\times {10}^{11}\kern0.5em {M}_{\odot } $$ ) has yielded different conclusions concerning whether or not it requires an unexpected contribution of mass from sources other than stars and fiducial dark matter. The different redshift inferred by these two analysis for the lensed galaxy appears to be the culprit. In this paper, we examine the impact of the background cosmology on our interpretation of the JWST data. We compare the measured characteristics of JWST-ER1 in flat-ΛCDM with those emerging in the context of R h = ct $$ {R}_{\mathrm{h}}= ct $$ . We show that, unlike the latter model's mitigation of the tension created by JWST's other discoveries, neither cosmology is favored by this particular Einstein ring. The disparity is common to both models, leaving open the question of whether a new type of mass, or a modified initial mass function, may be present in this source.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astronomische Nachrichten
Astronomische Nachrichten 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomische Nachrichten, founded in 1821 by H. C. Schumacher, is the oldest astronomical journal worldwide still being published. Famous astronomical discoveries and important papers on astronomy and astrophysics published in more than 300 volumes of the journal give an outstanding representation of the progress of astronomical research over the last 180 years. Today, Astronomical Notes/ Astronomische Nachrichten publishes articles in the field of observational and theoretical astrophysics and related topics in solar-system and solar physics. Additional, papers on astronomical instrumentation ground-based and space-based as well as papers about numerical astrophysical techniques and supercomputer modelling are covered. Papers can be completed by short video sequences in the electronic version. Astronomical Notes/ Astronomische Nachrichten also publishes special issues of meeting proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信