掌骨骨折手术修复术后康复和恢复运动标准缺乏标准化:一项系统综述

Q3 Medicine
Brian M. Phelps M.D. , Nikhilesh Mehra B.S. , Kihoon Bohle B.S. , Austin Hagen B.S. , Andrew George M.D. , Shari R. Liberman M.D. , Robert A. Jack II M.D.
{"title":"掌骨骨折手术修复术后康复和恢复运动标准缺乏标准化:一项系统综述","authors":"Brian M. Phelps M.D. ,&nbsp;Nikhilesh Mehra B.S. ,&nbsp;Kihoon Bohle B.S. ,&nbsp;Austin Hagen B.S. ,&nbsp;Andrew George M.D. ,&nbsp;Shari R. Liberman M.D. ,&nbsp;Robert A. Jack II M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To identify any postoperative rehabilitation parameters, as well as return-to-sport criteria after surgically treated fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Level I to IV studies that examined nonthumb metacarpal fractures treated surgically, had a minimum 12-month follow-up, and provided explicit return-to-sport (RTS) criteria were reviewed. The selected studies were evaluated for RTS criteria, RTS outcomes, and methodologic quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 1,688 studies initially identified, 3 met inclusion criteria. These studies comprised 91 patients from 6 distinct sports. The time frame for RTS varied from 1.8 to 3.4 weeks after surgery. Rehabilitation protocols emphasized range-of-motion exercises and bracing (67%). All studies included a rehabilitation protocol and subjective RTS criteria. However, none suggested specific objective measurement for RTS following metacarpal fracture surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the literature, there is a lack of agreement on the criteria for rehabilitation and returning to sport after surgical repair of metacarpal fractures. Each included study described the use of early ROM progression, and most reported using splint immobilization or bracing when returning to training or play. Subjective parameters for RTS were more widely reported than a specific postoperative amount of time, but these parameters varied based on sport and surgeon preference.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of Level III to IV studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 101107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sport Criteria Lack Standardization Following Surgical Repair of Metacarpal Fractures: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Brian M. Phelps M.D. ,&nbsp;Nikhilesh Mehra B.S. ,&nbsp;Kihoon Bohle B.S. ,&nbsp;Austin Hagen B.S. ,&nbsp;Andrew George M.D. ,&nbsp;Shari R. Liberman M.D. ,&nbsp;Robert A. Jack II M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To identify any postoperative rehabilitation parameters, as well as return-to-sport criteria after surgically treated fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Level I to IV studies that examined nonthumb metacarpal fractures treated surgically, had a minimum 12-month follow-up, and provided explicit return-to-sport (RTS) criteria were reviewed. The selected studies were evaluated for RTS criteria, RTS outcomes, and methodologic quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 1,688 studies initially identified, 3 met inclusion criteria. These studies comprised 91 patients from 6 distinct sports. The time frame for RTS varied from 1.8 to 3.4 weeks after surgery. Rehabilitation protocols emphasized range-of-motion exercises and bracing (67%). All studies included a rehabilitation protocol and subjective RTS criteria. However, none suggested specific objective measurement for RTS following metacarpal fracture surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In the literature, there is a lack of agreement on the criteria for rehabilitation and returning to sport after surgical repair of metacarpal fractures. Each included study described the use of early ROM progression, and most reported using splint immobilization or bracing when returning to training or play. Subjective parameters for RTS were more widely reported than a specific postoperative amount of time, but these parameters varied based on sport and surgeon preference.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of Level III to IV studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X25000331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X25000331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨第二至第五掌骨骨折手术治疗后的术后康复参数和恢复运动标准。方法:对手术治疗的非拇指掌骨骨折进行I - IV级研究,随访至少12个月,并提供明确的运动恢复(RTS)标准进行回顾。对所选研究的RTS标准、RTS结果和方法学质量进行评估。结果在最初确定的1,688项研究中,有3项符合纳入标准。这些研究包括来自6种不同运动的91名患者。RTS的时间范围从手术后1.8到3.4周不等。康复方案强调活动范围练习和支具(67%)。所有研究都包括康复方案和主观RTS标准。然而,没有人建议对掌骨骨折手术后的RTS进行具体的客观测量。结论在文献中,对于掌骨骨折手术修复后的康复和重返运动的标准缺乏共识。每一项纳入的研究都描述了早期ROM进展的使用,大多数报告在恢复训练或比赛时使用夹板固定或支具。RTS的主观参数比具体的术后时间更广泛地被报道,但这些参数根据运动和外科医生的偏好而变化。证据等级:IV级,对III级至IV级研究的系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sport Criteria Lack Standardization Following Surgical Repair of Metacarpal Fractures: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To identify any postoperative rehabilitation parameters, as well as return-to-sport criteria after surgically treated fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals.

Methods

Level I to IV studies that examined nonthumb metacarpal fractures treated surgically, had a minimum 12-month follow-up, and provided explicit return-to-sport (RTS) criteria were reviewed. The selected studies were evaluated for RTS criteria, RTS outcomes, and methodologic quality.

Results

Out of 1,688 studies initially identified, 3 met inclusion criteria. These studies comprised 91 patients from 6 distinct sports. The time frame for RTS varied from 1.8 to 3.4 weeks after surgery. Rehabilitation protocols emphasized range-of-motion exercises and bracing (67%). All studies included a rehabilitation protocol and subjective RTS criteria. However, none suggested specific objective measurement for RTS following metacarpal fracture surgery.

Conclusions

In the literature, there is a lack of agreement on the criteria for rehabilitation and returning to sport after surgical repair of metacarpal fractures. Each included study described the use of early ROM progression, and most reported using splint immobilization or bracing when returning to training or play. Subjective parameters for RTS were more widely reported than a specific postoperative amount of time, but these parameters varied based on sport and surgeon preference.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III to IV studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信