YouTube上关于外侧上髁炎的视频通常缺乏高质量、可靠的信息

Q3 Medicine

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101150

Jacob Q. Lin B.S. , Jacob Christopher B.A. , Monty Khela B.A. , Erastus Thuo B.A. , Harmon Khela B.S. , Dennis Chakkalakal Ph.D.

{"title":"YouTube上关于外侧上髁炎的视频通常缺乏高质量、可靠的信息","authors":"Jacob Q. Lin B.S. , Jacob Christopher B.A. , Monty Khela B.A. , Erastus Thuo B.A. , Harmon Khela B.S. , Dennis Chakkalakal Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To measure the quality and reliability of information from YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis (LE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The first 50 videos obtained from a YouTube search for \"lateral epicondylitis\" were evaluated. Video reliability was assessed using the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0-5). The videos’ reliability and quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0-4), and the Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS). Analysis of variance was used to examine differences in reliability and quality across content types and uploaders. Multivariate stepwise regressions were conducted to understand how specific video characteristics influence JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 50 videos had a total viewership of 15,491,927, with an average of 309,838 views per video (range 1,492-2,814,670). Most videos focused on disease-specific information (40%). Nonphysician medical professionals created most of the content (56%), followed by physicians (28%). The mean JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores were 2.69 (±.59) of 4.0, 2.64 (±.87) of 5.0, and 4.91 (±1.0) of 7.0, respectively. Analysis showed that academic sources had greater LESS scores (<em>P</em> = .035); physicians had higher JAMA benchmark criteria scores than non-physicians (<em>P</em> = .025); nonphysicians had greater GQS than commercials (<em>P</em> = .031); and nonphysicians had greater VPI than physicians (<em>P</em> = .020). Linear regression analysis showed longer duration videos correlated with greater GCS scores (β: 0.656, <em>P</em> < .001) and greater LESS (β: 0.614, <em>P</em> < .001), whereas commercial content types had with lower GCS (standardized beta -0.280, <em>P</em> = .045).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis have millions of views, the information covered had low to moderate quality and reliability as measured by JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition that patients may research online. As the content on YouTube is continually increasing and its popularity remains high, it is important to continually investigate the quality of information available on this platform.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 101150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High-Quality, Reliable Information\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Q. Lin B.S. , Jacob Christopher B.A. , Monty Khela B.A. , Erastus Thuo B.A. , Harmon Khela B.S. , Dennis Chakkalakal Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To measure the quality and reliability of information from YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis (LE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The first 50 videos obtained from a YouTube search for \\\"lateral epicondylitis\\\" were evaluated. Video reliability was assessed using the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0-5). The videos’ reliability and quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0-4), and the Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS). Analysis of variance was used to examine differences in reliability and quality across content types and uploaders. Multivariate stepwise regressions were conducted to understand how specific video characteristics influence JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 50 videos had a total viewership of 15,491,927, with an average of 309,838 views per video (range 1,492-2,814,670). Most videos focused on disease-specific information (40%). Nonphysician medical professionals created most of the content (56%), followed by physicians (28%). The mean JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores were 2.69 (±.59) of 4.0, 2.64 (±.87) of 5.0, and 4.91 (±1.0) of 7.0, respectively. Analysis showed that academic sources had greater LESS scores (<em>P</em> = .035); physicians had higher JAMA benchmark criteria scores than non-physicians (<em>P</em> = .025); nonphysicians had greater GQS than commercials (<em>P</em> = .031); and nonphysicians had greater VPI than physicians (<em>P</em> = .020). Linear regression analysis showed longer duration videos correlated with greater GCS scores (β: 0.656, <em>P</em> < .001) and greater LESS (β: 0.614, <em>P</em> < .001), whereas commercial content types had with lower GCS (standardized beta -0.280, <em>P</em> = .045).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis have millions of views, the information covered had low to moderate quality and reliability as measured by JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition that patients may research online. As the content on YouTube is continually increasing and its popularity remains high, it is important to continually investigate the quality of information available on this platform.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X25000768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X25000768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价YouTube视频中有关外上髁炎（LE）信息的质量和可靠性。方法对从YouTube搜索“外侧上髁炎”获得的前50个视频进行评价。视频可靠性采用美国医学会杂志（JAMA）基准标准（范围0-5）进行评估。使用全球质量评分（GQS）（范围0-4）和外侧上髁炎特定评分（LESS）来评估视频的可靠性和质量。方差分析用于检查不同内容类型和上传者在可靠性和质量上的差异。进行多变量逐步回归以了解特定视频特征如何影响JAMA基准标准、GQS和LESS评分。结果50个视频的总浏览量为15,491,927，平均每个视频的浏览量为309,838（范围为1,492-2,814,670）。大多数视频侧重于特定疾病的信息（40%）。非医师医疗专业人员创建的内容最多（56%），其次是医生（28%）。JAMA基准标准、GQS和LESS的平均评分分别为2.69（±0.59）分（4.0分）、2.64（±0.87）分（5.0分）和4.91（±1.0）分（7.0分）。分析显示，学术来源的LESS得分更高（P = .035）；医师的JAMA基准标准评分高于非医师（P = 0.025）；非医生的GQS高于商业广告（P = 0.031）；非医师的VPI高于医师（P = 0.020）。线性回归分析显示，视频时长越长，GCS评分越高(β: 0.656, P <；.001)和更大的LESS (β: 0.614, P <；.001)，而商业内容类型具有较低的GCS（标准化beta -0.280, P = 0.045）。结论尽管YouTube上有关外上髁炎的视频有数百万的观看量，但根据JAMA基准标准、GQS和LESS衡量，所涵盖的信息质量和可靠性低至中等。外上髁炎是一种常见的疾病，患者可以在网上搜索。由于YouTube上的内容不断增加，其受欢迎程度仍然很高，因此不断调查该平台上可用信息的质量非常重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High-Quality, Reliable Information

Purpose

To measure the quality and reliability of information from YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Methods

The first 50 videos obtained from a YouTube search for "lateral epicondylitis" were evaluated. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0-5). The videos’ reliability and quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0-4), and the Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS). Analysis of variance was used to examine differences in reliability and quality across content types and uploaders. Multivariate stepwise regressions were conducted to understand how specific video characteristics influence JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores.

Results

The 50 videos had a total viewership of 15,491,927, with an average of 309,838 views per video (range 1,492-2,814,670). Most videos focused on disease-specific information (40%). Nonphysician medical professionals created most of the content (56%), followed by physicians (28%). The mean JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores were 2.69 (±.59) of 4.0, 2.64 (±.87) of 5.0, and 4.91 (±1.0) of 7.0, respectively. Analysis showed that academic sources had greater LESS scores (P = .035); physicians had higher JAMA benchmark criteria scores than non-physicians (P = .025); nonphysicians had greater GQS than commercials (P = .031); and nonphysicians had greater VPI than physicians (P = .020). Linear regression analysis showed longer duration videos correlated with greater GCS scores (β: 0.656, P < .001) and greater LESS (β: 0.614, P < .001), whereas commercial content types had with lower GCS (standardized beta -0.280, P = .045).

Conclusions

Although YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis have millions of views, the information covered had low to moderate quality and reliability as measured by JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS.

Clinical Relevance

Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition that patients may research online. As the content on YouTube is continually increasing and its popularity remains high, it is important to continually investigate the quality of information available on this platform.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊