美国多发性骨髓瘤免疫治疗联盟的一项多中心研究表明,替司他单抗在既往接受bcma定向治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Danai Dima, Mariola A. Vazquez-Martinez, James A. Davis, Utkarsh Goel, Aimaz Afrough, Aishwarya Sannareddy, Oren Pasvolsky, Beatrice Razzo, Rahul Banerjee, Jack Khouri, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Alex Lieberman-Cribbin, Masooma Shifa Rana, Kelley Julian, Shaun DeJarnette, Andrew J. Portuguese, Mahmoud R. Gaballa, Gabriel De Avila, Sandra Susaniba Adaniya, Shahzad Raza, Megan M. Herr, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Tiffany Richards, Hitomi Hosoya, Lekha Mikkilineni, Gurbakhash Kaur, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Adriana Rossi, Yi Lin, Shebli Atrash, Douglas Sborov, Kenneth H. Shain, Peter M. Voorhees, Shambavi Richard, Alfred L. Garfall, Doris K. Hansen, Surbhi Sidana, Krina K. Patel, Andrew J. Cowan, Larry D. Anderson, Hans C. Lee, Faiz Anwer, Christopher J. Ferreri, Leyla Shune
{"title":"美国多发性骨髓瘤免疫治疗联盟的一项多中心研究表明,替司他单抗在既往接受bcma定向治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效","authors":"Danai Dima, Mariola A. Vazquez-Martinez, James A. Davis, Utkarsh Goel, Aimaz Afrough, Aishwarya Sannareddy, Oren Pasvolsky, Beatrice Razzo, Rahul Banerjee, Jack Khouri, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Alex Lieberman-Cribbin, Masooma Shifa Rana, Kelley Julian, Shaun DeJarnette, Andrew J. Portuguese, Mahmoud R. Gaballa, Gabriel De Avila, Sandra Susaniba Adaniya, Shahzad Raza, Megan M. Herr, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Tiffany Richards, Hitomi Hosoya, Lekha Mikkilineni, Gurbakhash Kaur, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Adriana Rossi, Yi Lin, Shebli Atrash, Douglas Sborov, Kenneth H. Shain, Peter M. Voorhees, Shambavi Richard, Alfred L. Garfall, Doris K. Hansen, Surbhi Sidana, Krina K. Patel, Andrew J. Cowan, Larry D. Anderson, Hans C. Lee, Faiz Anwer, Christopher J. Ferreri, Leyla Shune","doi":"10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data describing outcomes of teclistamab in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) are limited. The goal of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with prior BCMA-DT. A total of 385 patients were included, of whom 193 (50%) had received prior BCMA-DT, including 47 (24%) patients with prior antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-only, 99 (51%) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T)-only, 36 (19%) with both ADC and CAR T, 6 (3%) with bispecific antibody-only, and 5 (3%) with other combinations. Most safety parameters between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-DT cohort had a lower overall response rate (ORR: 48.7% versus 61.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.6 versus 8.2 months; <i>p</i> = 0.017) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-DT. However, in multivariable analysis, despite a clear trend, ultimately receipt of a prior BCMA-DT was not independently associated with ORR or PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.057 and <i>p</i> = 0.1, respectively). No significant differences in PFS were noted when stratifying patients by number of prior BCMA-DTs, types of all prior BCMA-DTs received, type of most recent prior BCMA-DT, or depth of response to most recent BCMA-DT. Using the maximally selected rank statistics method, the optimal cut-off for time from the last BCMA-DT exposure to teclistamab initiation was identified as 8.7 months. Patients with &gt;8.7 months between their last exposure to prior BCMA-DT and teclistamab initiation had a significantly improved median PFS with teclistamab (8.1 months, 95% CI: 4.6–11.7) compared to patients with &lt;8.7 months (2.5 months, 95% CI: 1.1–5.7), <i>p</i> = 0.001. Altogether, our findings support the use of teclistamab as a viable treatment option in patients previously exposed to BCMA-DT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy: a multicenter study from the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium\",\"authors\":\"Danai Dima, Mariola A. Vazquez-Martinez, James A. Davis, Utkarsh Goel, Aimaz Afrough, Aishwarya Sannareddy, Oren Pasvolsky, Beatrice Razzo, Rahul Banerjee, Jack Khouri, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Alex Lieberman-Cribbin, Masooma Shifa Rana, Kelley Julian, Shaun DeJarnette, Andrew J. Portuguese, Mahmoud R. Gaballa, Gabriel De Avila, Sandra Susaniba Adaniya, Shahzad Raza, Megan M. Herr, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Tiffany Richards, Hitomi Hosoya, Lekha Mikkilineni, Gurbakhash Kaur, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Adriana Rossi, Yi Lin, Shebli Atrash, Douglas Sborov, Kenneth H. Shain, Peter M. Voorhees, Shambavi Richard, Alfred L. Garfall, Doris K. Hansen, Surbhi Sidana, Krina K. Patel, Andrew J. Cowan, Larry D. Anderson, Hans C. Lee, Faiz Anwer, Christopher J. Ferreri, Leyla Shune\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Data describing outcomes of teclistamab in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) are limited. The goal of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with prior BCMA-DT. A total of 385 patients were included, of whom 193 (50%) had received prior BCMA-DT, including 47 (24%) patients with prior antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-only, 99 (51%) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T)-only, 36 (19%) with both ADC and CAR T, 6 (3%) with bispecific antibody-only, and 5 (3%) with other combinations. Most safety parameters between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-DT cohort had a lower overall response rate (ORR: 48.7% versus 61.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.6 versus 8.2 months; <i>p</i> = 0.017) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-DT. However, in multivariable analysis, despite a clear trend, ultimately receipt of a prior BCMA-DT was not independently associated with ORR or PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.057 and <i>p</i> = 0.1, respectively). No significant differences in PFS were noted when stratifying patients by number of prior BCMA-DTs, types of all prior BCMA-DTs received, type of most recent prior BCMA-DT, or depth of response to most recent BCMA-DT. Using the maximally selected rank statistics method, the optimal cut-off for time from the last BCMA-DT exposure to teclistamab initiation was identified as 8.7 months. Patients with &gt;8.7 months between their last exposure to prior BCMA-DT and teclistamab initiation had a significantly improved median PFS with teclistamab (8.1 months, 95% CI: 4.6–11.7) compared to patients with &lt;8.7 months (2.5 months, 95% CI: 1.1–5.7), <i>p</i> = 0.001. Altogether, our findings support the use of teclistamab as a viable treatment option in patients previously exposed to BCMA-DT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

描述先前接受bcma定向治疗(BCMA-DT)的多发性骨髓瘤患者使用teclistamab治疗结果的数据有限。这项多中心回顾性分析的目的是报告teclistamab在既往BCMA-DT患者中的疗效和安全性。共纳入385例患者,其中193例(50%)既往接受过BCMA-DT治疗,其中47例(24%)既往仅接受抗体-药物偶联(ADC)治疗,99例(51%)仅接受嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗(CAR - T), 36例(19%)同时接受ADC和CAR - T治疗,6例(3%)仅接受双特异性抗体治疗,5例(3%)接受其他联合治疗。队列间的大多数安全参数具有可比性。先前的BCMA-DT队列总体缓解率较低(ORR: 48.7% vs 61.5%;p = 0.012),中位无进展生存期(PFS: 4.6个月vs 8.2个月;p = 0.017),与没有BCMA-DT的队列相比。然而,在多变量分析中,尽管有明显的趋势,但最终接受BCMA-DT与ORR或PFS并没有独立相关(p = 0.057和p = 0.1)。根据既往BCMA-DT的数量、所有既往BCMA-DT的类型、最近一次BCMA-DT的类型或对最近一次BCMA-DT的反应深度对患者进行分层时,PFS没有明显差异。使用最大选择秩统计方法,从最后一次BCMA-DT暴露到teclistamab起始的最佳截止时间为8.7个月。从上次接触BCMA-DT到开始使用特司他单抗的时间间隔为>;8.7个月的患者相比于<;8.7个月的患者(2.5个月,95% CI: 1.1-5.7),特司他单抗的中位PFS显著改善(8.1个月,95% CI: 4.6-11.7), p = 0.001。总之,我们的研究结果支持使用teclistamab作为先前暴露于BCMA-DT患者的可行治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy: a multicenter study from the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium

Outcomes of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy: a multicenter study from the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium

Data describing outcomes of teclistamab in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) are limited. The goal of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with prior BCMA-DT. A total of 385 patients were included, of whom 193 (50%) had received prior BCMA-DT, including 47 (24%) patients with prior antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-only, 99 (51%) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T)-only, 36 (19%) with both ADC and CAR T, 6 (3%) with bispecific antibody-only, and 5 (3%) with other combinations. Most safety parameters between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-DT cohort had a lower overall response rate (ORR: 48.7% versus 61.5%; p = 0.012), and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.6 versus 8.2 months; p = 0.017) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-DT. However, in multivariable analysis, despite a clear trend, ultimately receipt of a prior BCMA-DT was not independently associated with ORR or PFS (p = 0.057 and p = 0.1, respectively). No significant differences in PFS were noted when stratifying patients by number of prior BCMA-DTs, types of all prior BCMA-DTs received, type of most recent prior BCMA-DT, or depth of response to most recent BCMA-DT. Using the maximally selected rank statistics method, the optimal cut-off for time from the last BCMA-DT exposure to teclistamab initiation was identified as 8.7 months. Patients with >8.7 months between their last exposure to prior BCMA-DT and teclistamab initiation had a significantly improved median PFS with teclistamab (8.1 months, 95% CI: 4.6–11.7) compared to patients with <8.7 months (2.5 months, 95% CI: 1.1–5.7), p = 0.001. Altogether, our findings support the use of teclistamab as a viable treatment option in patients previously exposed to BCMA-DT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信