Danai Dima, Mariola A. Vazquez-Martinez, James A. Davis, Utkarsh Goel, Aimaz Afrough, Aishwarya Sannareddy, Oren Pasvolsky, Beatrice Razzo, Rahul Banerjee, Jack Khouri, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Alex Lieberman-Cribbin, Masooma Shifa Rana, Kelley Julian, Shaun DeJarnette, Andrew J. Portuguese, Mahmoud R. Gaballa, Gabriel De Avila, Sandra Susaniba Adaniya, Shahzad Raza, Megan M. Herr, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Tiffany Richards, Hitomi Hosoya, Lekha Mikkilineni, Gurbakhash Kaur, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Adriana Rossi, Yi Lin, Shebli Atrash, Douglas Sborov, Kenneth H. Shain, Peter M. Voorhees, Shambavi Richard, Alfred L. Garfall, Doris K. Hansen, Surbhi Sidana, Krina K. Patel, Andrew J. Cowan, Larry D. Anderson, Hans C. Lee, Faiz Anwer, Christopher J. Ferreri, Leyla Shune
{"title":"美国多发性骨髓瘤免疫治疗联盟的一项多中心研究表明,替司他单抗在既往接受bcma定向治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效","authors":"Danai Dima, Mariola A. Vazquez-Martinez, James A. Davis, Utkarsh Goel, Aimaz Afrough, Aishwarya Sannareddy, Oren Pasvolsky, Beatrice Razzo, Rahul Banerjee, Jack Khouri, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Alex Lieberman-Cribbin, Masooma Shifa Rana, Kelley Julian, Shaun DeJarnette, Andrew J. Portuguese, Mahmoud R. Gaballa, Gabriel De Avila, Sandra Susaniba Adaniya, Shahzad Raza, Megan M. Herr, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Tiffany Richards, Hitomi Hosoya, Lekha Mikkilineni, Gurbakhash Kaur, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Adriana Rossi, Yi Lin, Shebli Atrash, Douglas Sborov, Kenneth H. Shain, Peter M. Voorhees, Shambavi Richard, Alfred L. Garfall, Doris K. Hansen, Surbhi Sidana, Krina K. Patel, Andrew J. Cowan, Larry D. Anderson, Hans C. Lee, Faiz Anwer, Christopher J. Ferreri, Leyla Shune","doi":"10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data describing outcomes of teclistamab in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) are limited. The goal of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with prior BCMA-DT. A total of 385 patients were included, of whom 193 (50%) had received prior BCMA-DT, including 47 (24%) patients with prior antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-only, 99 (51%) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T)-only, 36 (19%) with both ADC and CAR T, 6 (3%) with bispecific antibody-only, and 5 (3%) with other combinations. Most safety parameters between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-DT cohort had a lower overall response rate (ORR: 48.7% versus 61.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.6 versus 8.2 months; <i>p</i> = 0.017) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-DT. However, in multivariable analysis, despite a clear trend, ultimately receipt of a prior BCMA-DT was not independently associated with ORR or PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.057 and <i>p</i> = 0.1, respectively). No significant differences in PFS were noted when stratifying patients by number of prior BCMA-DTs, types of all prior BCMA-DTs received, type of most recent prior BCMA-DT, or depth of response to most recent BCMA-DT. Using the maximally selected rank statistics method, the optimal cut-off for time from the last BCMA-DT exposure to teclistamab initiation was identified as 8.7 months. Patients with >8.7 months between their last exposure to prior BCMA-DT and teclistamab initiation had a significantly improved median PFS with teclistamab (8.1 months, 95% CI: 4.6–11.7) compared to patients with <8.7 months (2.5 months, 95% CI: 1.1–5.7), <i>p</i> = 0.001. Altogether, our findings support the use of teclistamab as a viable treatment option in patients previously exposed to BCMA-DT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy: a multicenter study from the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium\",\"authors\":\"Danai Dima, Mariola A. Vazquez-Martinez, James A. Davis, Utkarsh Goel, Aimaz Afrough, Aishwarya Sannareddy, Oren Pasvolsky, Beatrice Razzo, Rahul Banerjee, Jack Khouri, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Alex Lieberman-Cribbin, Masooma Shifa Rana, Kelley Julian, Shaun DeJarnette, Andrew J. Portuguese, Mahmoud R. Gaballa, Gabriel De Avila, Sandra Susaniba Adaniya, Shahzad Raza, Megan M. Herr, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Tiffany Richards, Hitomi Hosoya, Lekha Mikkilineni, Gurbakhash Kaur, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Adriana Rossi, Yi Lin, Shebli Atrash, Douglas Sborov, Kenneth H. Shain, Peter M. Voorhees, Shambavi Richard, Alfred L. Garfall, Doris K. Hansen, Surbhi Sidana, Krina K. Patel, Andrew J. Cowan, Larry D. Anderson, Hans C. Lee, Faiz Anwer, Christopher J. Ferreri, Leyla Shune\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Data describing outcomes of teclistamab in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) are limited. The goal of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with prior BCMA-DT. A total of 385 patients were included, of whom 193 (50%) had received prior BCMA-DT, including 47 (24%) patients with prior antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-only, 99 (51%) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T)-only, 36 (19%) with both ADC and CAR T, 6 (3%) with bispecific antibody-only, and 5 (3%) with other combinations. Most safety parameters between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-DT cohort had a lower overall response rate (ORR: 48.7% versus 61.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.6 versus 8.2 months; <i>p</i> = 0.017) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-DT. However, in multivariable analysis, despite a clear trend, ultimately receipt of a prior BCMA-DT was not independently associated with ORR or PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.057 and <i>p</i> = 0.1, respectively). No significant differences in PFS were noted when stratifying patients by number of prior BCMA-DTs, types of all prior BCMA-DTs received, type of most recent prior BCMA-DT, or depth of response to most recent BCMA-DT. Using the maximally selected rank statistics method, the optimal cut-off for time from the last BCMA-DT exposure to teclistamab initiation was identified as 8.7 months. Patients with >8.7 months between their last exposure to prior BCMA-DT and teclistamab initiation had a significantly improved median PFS with teclistamab (8.1 months, 95% CI: 4.6–11.7) compared to patients with <8.7 months (2.5 months, 95% CI: 1.1–5.7), <i>p</i> = 0.001. Altogether, our findings support the use of teclistamab as a viable treatment option in patients previously exposed to BCMA-DT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01314-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy: a multicenter study from the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium
Data describing outcomes of teclistamab in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to BCMA-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) are limited. The goal of this multicenter retrospective analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with prior BCMA-DT. A total of 385 patients were included, of whom 193 (50%) had received prior BCMA-DT, including 47 (24%) patients with prior antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-only, 99 (51%) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T)-only, 36 (19%) with both ADC and CAR T, 6 (3%) with bispecific antibody-only, and 5 (3%) with other combinations. Most safety parameters between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-DT cohort had a lower overall response rate (ORR: 48.7% versus 61.5%; p = 0.012), and median progression-free survival (PFS: 4.6 versus 8.2 months; p = 0.017) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-DT. However, in multivariable analysis, despite a clear trend, ultimately receipt of a prior BCMA-DT was not independently associated with ORR or PFS (p = 0.057 and p = 0.1, respectively). No significant differences in PFS were noted when stratifying patients by number of prior BCMA-DTs, types of all prior BCMA-DTs received, type of most recent prior BCMA-DT, or depth of response to most recent BCMA-DT. Using the maximally selected rank statistics method, the optimal cut-off for time from the last BCMA-DT exposure to teclistamab initiation was identified as 8.7 months. Patients with >8.7 months between their last exposure to prior BCMA-DT and teclistamab initiation had a significantly improved median PFS with teclistamab (8.1 months, 95% CI: 4.6–11.7) compared to patients with <8.7 months (2.5 months, 95% CI: 1.1–5.7), p = 0.001. Altogether, our findings support the use of teclistamab as a viable treatment option in patients previously exposed to BCMA-DT.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.