{"title":"心脏手术中基于机器学习的混合风险评估系统(ERES):来自ASA评分分析的补充见解。","authors":"Ayşe Banu Birlik, Hakan Tozan, Kevser Banu Köse","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate prediction of postoperative mortality risk after cardiac surgery is essential to improve patient outcomes. Traditional models, such as EuroSCORE I, often struggle to capture the complex interactions among clinical variables, leading to suboptimal performance in specific populations. In this study, we developed and validated the Ensemble-Based Risk Estimation System (ERES), a machine learning model designed to enhance mortality prediction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. A retrospective analysis of 543 patients was performed using six machine learning algorithms applied to preoperative clinical data to assess predictive accuracy and clinical outcomes. Feature selection techniques, including Gini importance, Recursive Feature Elimination, and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling, were employed to improve accuracy and address class imbalance. ERES, which utilizes 15 key features, demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to EuroSCORE I. Calibration plots indicated more accurate probability estimates, whereas SHAP analysis identified creatinine, age, and left ventricular ejection fraction as the most significant predictors. The decision curve analysis further confirmed the superior clinical utility of ERES across a range of decision thresholds. Additionally, although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA PS) score had limited predictive power independently, its combination with EuroSCORE I enhanced the predictive performance. Integrating machine learning models like ERES into clinical practice can improve decision making and patient outcomes although external validation is warranted for broader implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 6","pages":"e0000889"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Banu Birlik, Hakan Tozan, Kevser Banu Köse\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate prediction of postoperative mortality risk after cardiac surgery is essential to improve patient outcomes. Traditional models, such as EuroSCORE I, often struggle to capture the complex interactions among clinical variables, leading to suboptimal performance in specific populations. In this study, we developed and validated the Ensemble-Based Risk Estimation System (ERES), a machine learning model designed to enhance mortality prediction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. A retrospective analysis of 543 patients was performed using six machine learning algorithms applied to preoperative clinical data to assess predictive accuracy and clinical outcomes. Feature selection techniques, including Gini importance, Recursive Feature Elimination, and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling, were employed to improve accuracy and address class imbalance. ERES, which utilizes 15 key features, demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to EuroSCORE I. Calibration plots indicated more accurate probability estimates, whereas SHAP analysis identified creatinine, age, and left ventricular ejection fraction as the most significant predictors. The decision curve analysis further confirmed the superior clinical utility of ERES across a range of decision thresholds. Additionally, although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA PS) score had limited predictive power independently, its combination with EuroSCORE I enhanced the predictive performance. Integrating machine learning models like ERES into clinical practice can improve decision making and patient outcomes although external validation is warranted for broader implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"e0000889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184902/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis.
Accurate prediction of postoperative mortality risk after cardiac surgery is essential to improve patient outcomes. Traditional models, such as EuroSCORE I, often struggle to capture the complex interactions among clinical variables, leading to suboptimal performance in specific populations. In this study, we developed and validated the Ensemble-Based Risk Estimation System (ERES), a machine learning model designed to enhance mortality prediction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. A retrospective analysis of 543 patients was performed using six machine learning algorithms applied to preoperative clinical data to assess predictive accuracy and clinical outcomes. Feature selection techniques, including Gini importance, Recursive Feature Elimination, and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling, were employed to improve accuracy and address class imbalance. ERES, which utilizes 15 key features, demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to EuroSCORE I. Calibration plots indicated more accurate probability estimates, whereas SHAP analysis identified creatinine, age, and left ventricular ejection fraction as the most significant predictors. The decision curve analysis further confirmed the superior clinical utility of ERES across a range of decision thresholds. Additionally, although the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA PS) score had limited predictive power independently, its combination with EuroSCORE I enhanced the predictive performance. Integrating machine learning models like ERES into clinical practice can improve decision making and patient outcomes although external validation is warranted for broader implementation.