舒洛培南与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗非并发症尿路感染的比较。

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400414
Sailaja Puttagunta, Steven I Aronin, Jayanti Gupta, Anita F Das, Kalpana Gupta, Michael W Dunne
{"title":"舒洛培南与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗非并发症尿路感染的比较。","authors":"Sailaja Puttagunta, Steven I Aronin, Jayanti Gupta, Anita F Das, Kalpana Gupta, Michael W Dunne","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing antibiotics for uncomplicated urinary tract infections are becoming less reliably effective owing to increasing antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sulopenem/probenecid for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial of 5 days of sulopenem versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection. The primary end point was overall success, defined as combined clinical cure and microbiologic eradication by day 12, evaluated in the microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received any trial medication and had a positive urine culture with 10<sup>5</sup> colony-forming units (CFU)/ml or more of an Enterobacterales uropathogen (e.g., <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i> species).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2222 patients were enrolled, and the median age was 51 years (interquartile range, 35-62 years). Ninety-one (9.2%) patients in the primary population (microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population), the combined population of patients with a positive baseline urine culture and without regard to amoxicillin/clavulanate susceptibility, had a baseline pathogen resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. Overall success in the microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population occurred in 318 of 522 (60.9%) participants treated with sulopenem versus 260 of 468 (55.6%) participants treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, 5.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 11.5), meeting criteria for noninferiority. In the primary population with a baseline uropathogen susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, success occurred in 296 of 480 (61.7%) participants treated with sulopenem versus 243 of 442 (55.0%) participants treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, 6.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 13.0). In the primary population with a baseline uropathogen not susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, success occurred in 22 of 42 (52.4%) patients treated with sulopenem versus 17 of 25 (68.0%) patients treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, -15.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -37.5 to 9.1]. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently with sulopenem compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate, including diarrhea (8.1% vs. 4.1%), nausea (4.3% vs. 2.9%), and headache (2.2% vs. 1.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sulopenem was noninferior to amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of adult women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection, but was associated with more frequent mild adverse events. (Funded by Iterum Therapeutics; REASSURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05584657.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 7","pages":"EVIDoa2400414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sulopenem versus Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Sailaja Puttagunta, Steven I Aronin, Jayanti Gupta, Anita F Das, Kalpana Gupta, Michael W Dunne\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/EVIDoa2400414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing antibiotics for uncomplicated urinary tract infections are becoming less reliably effective owing to increasing antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sulopenem/probenecid for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial of 5 days of sulopenem versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection. The primary end point was overall success, defined as combined clinical cure and microbiologic eradication by day 12, evaluated in the microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received any trial medication and had a positive urine culture with 10<sup>5</sup> colony-forming units (CFU)/ml or more of an Enterobacterales uropathogen (e.g., <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i> species).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2222 patients were enrolled, and the median age was 51 years (interquartile range, 35-62 years). Ninety-one (9.2%) patients in the primary population (microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population), the combined population of patients with a positive baseline urine culture and without regard to amoxicillin/clavulanate susceptibility, had a baseline pathogen resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. Overall success in the microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population occurred in 318 of 522 (60.9%) participants treated with sulopenem versus 260 of 468 (55.6%) participants treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, 5.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 11.5), meeting criteria for noninferiority. In the primary population with a baseline uropathogen susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, success occurred in 296 of 480 (61.7%) participants treated with sulopenem versus 243 of 442 (55.0%) participants treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, 6.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 13.0). In the primary population with a baseline uropathogen not susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, success occurred in 22 of 42 (52.4%) patients treated with sulopenem versus 17 of 25 (68.0%) patients treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, -15.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -37.5 to 9.1]. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently with sulopenem compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate, including diarrhea (8.1% vs. 4.1%), nausea (4.3% vs. 2.9%), and headache (2.2% vs. 1.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sulopenem was noninferior to amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of adult women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection, but was associated with more frequent mild adverse events. (Funded by Iterum Therapeutics; REASSURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05584657.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"EVIDoa2400414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于抗菌素耐药性的增加,用于治疗无并发症尿路感染的现有抗生素正变得不那么可靠有效。我们的目的是评估舒洛培南/丙戊酸治疗无并发症尿路感染的安全性和有效性。方法:我们进行了一项双盲、随机、对照、非劣效性试验,对无并发症尿路感染的女性进行了5天的苏洛培南与阿莫西林/克拉维酸对照。主要终点是总体成功,定义为临床治愈和微生物根除的结合,在第12天,在微生物修饰的意向治疗人群中进行评估,其中包括所有随机分配的接受任何试验药物的患者,并且尿液培养阳性,细菌集落形成单位(CFU)/ml或更多肠杆菌尿路病原体(如大肠杆菌,克雷伯氏菌)。结果:共纳入2222例患者,中位年龄为51岁(四分位数范围为35-62岁)。原发人群(微生物修饰意向治疗人群)中91例(9.2%)患者,即基线尿培养阳性且不考虑阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐敏感性的患者,基线病原体对三种或三种以上抗生素耐药。在微生物修饰的意向治疗人群中,522名接受苏洛培南治疗的参与者中有318名(60.9%)成功,而468名接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的参与者中有260名(55.6%)成功(差异5.4个百分点;95%置信区间[CI], -0.8 ~ 11.5),符合非劣效性标准。在基线尿路病原体对阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐敏感的主要人群中,480名接受苏洛培南治疗的参与者中有296名(61.7%)成功,而442名接受阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的参与者中有243名(55.0%)成功(差异6.7个百分点;95% CI, 0.3 ~ 13.0)。在基线尿路病原体对阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐不敏感的主要人群中,42例使用索洛培南治疗的患者中有22例(52.4%)成功,而25例使用阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐治疗的患者中有17例(68.0%)成功(差异为-15.6个百分点;95% CI, -37.5 ~ 9.1]。与阿莫西林/克拉维酸相比,舒洛培南治疗后出现的不良事件更频繁,包括腹泻(8.1%对4.1%)、恶心(4.3%对2.9%)和头痛(2.2%对1.5%)。结论:在治疗无并发症的成年女性尿路感染方面,舒洛培南的疗效不低于阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐,但与更频繁的轻度不良事件相关。(由Iterum Therapeutics资助;确保ClinicalTrials.gov号码,NCT05584657.)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sulopenem versus Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection.

Background: Existing antibiotics for uncomplicated urinary tract infections are becoming less reliably effective owing to increasing antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sulopenem/probenecid for uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial of 5 days of sulopenem versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection. The primary end point was overall success, defined as combined clinical cure and microbiologic eradication by day 12, evaluated in the microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received any trial medication and had a positive urine culture with 105 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml or more of an Enterobacterales uropathogen (e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species).

Results: A total of 2222 patients were enrolled, and the median age was 51 years (interquartile range, 35-62 years). Ninety-one (9.2%) patients in the primary population (microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population), the combined population of patients with a positive baseline urine culture and without regard to amoxicillin/clavulanate susceptibility, had a baseline pathogen resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. Overall success in the microbiologic-modified intent-to-treat population occurred in 318 of 522 (60.9%) participants treated with sulopenem versus 260 of 468 (55.6%) participants treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, 5.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 11.5), meeting criteria for noninferiority. In the primary population with a baseline uropathogen susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, success occurred in 296 of 480 (61.7%) participants treated with sulopenem versus 243 of 442 (55.0%) participants treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, 6.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 13.0). In the primary population with a baseline uropathogen not susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, success occurred in 22 of 42 (52.4%) patients treated with sulopenem versus 17 of 25 (68.0%) patients treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (difference, -15.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -37.5 to 9.1]. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently with sulopenem compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate, including diarrhea (8.1% vs. 4.1%), nausea (4.3% vs. 2.9%), and headache (2.2% vs. 1.5%).

Conclusions: Sulopenem was noninferior to amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of adult women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection, but was associated with more frequent mild adverse events. (Funded by Iterum Therapeutics; REASSURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05584657.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信