派姆单抗联合骨修饰剂治疗女性乳腺癌患者的疗效和免疫相关不良事件

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf134
Alexis LeVee, Esther Peluso, Melissa G Lechner, Nora Ruel, Joanne Mortimer, Irene Kang, Karen Tsai
{"title":"派姆单抗联合骨修饰剂治疗女性乳腺癌患者的疗效和免疫相关不良事件","authors":"Alexis LeVee, Esther Peluso, Melissa G Lechner, Nora Ruel, Joanne Mortimer, Irene Kang, Karen Tsai","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging studies demonstrate that some bone-modifying agents (BMAs), such as denosumab (Dmab), can modulate immune responses by increasing tumor-infiltrating T cells and expanding the T-cell repertoire. Female patients with breast cancer in particular often receive concurrent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BMAs. However, the clinical impact of BMAs on immune-related adverse events (irAE) and cancer outcomes in patients treated with ICI remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Female patients with breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab between 2017 and 2024 were included. Patients were categorized according to BMA received: zoledronic acid (ZA), Dmab, or none. BMA therapy was considered received within a dose interval prior to ICI (12 months for ZA; 6 months for Dmab), during ICI therapy, or within 1 month of the last ICI dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 425 female patients with breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab, 55 (12.9%) received Dmab, 31 (7.3%) received ZA, and 339 (80.0%) received no BMA. A total of 255 (60%) patients had early-stage breast cancer, and 170 (40%) had metastatic disease. After a median follow-up of 19.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-20.8), the incidence of severe irAE was higher in patients who received Dmab vs those who received no BMA (21.8% vs 11.5%, P = .04). Patients who received Dmab had higher responses (48.0%) compared to those who received ZA (31.6%) and no BMA (35.0%), although not statistically significant (P = .3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to suggest an increased rate of severe irAE and potential synergistic anti-tumor effect of Dmab in combination with ICI in female patients with breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and immune-related adverse events of pembrolizumab with bone-modifying agents in female patients with breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis LeVee, Esther Peluso, Melissa G Lechner, Nora Ruel, Joanne Mortimer, Irene Kang, Karen Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging studies demonstrate that some bone-modifying agents (BMAs), such as denosumab (Dmab), can modulate immune responses by increasing tumor-infiltrating T cells and expanding the T-cell repertoire. Female patients with breast cancer in particular often receive concurrent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BMAs. However, the clinical impact of BMAs on immune-related adverse events (irAE) and cancer outcomes in patients treated with ICI remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Female patients with breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab between 2017 and 2024 were included. Patients were categorized according to BMA received: zoledronic acid (ZA), Dmab, or none. BMA therapy was considered received within a dose interval prior to ICI (12 months for ZA; 6 months for Dmab), during ICI therapy, or within 1 month of the last ICI dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 425 female patients with breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab, 55 (12.9%) received Dmab, 31 (7.3%) received ZA, and 339 (80.0%) received no BMA. A total of 255 (60%) patients had early-stage breast cancer, and 170 (40%) had metastatic disease. After a median follow-up of 19.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-20.8), the incidence of severe irAE was higher in patients who received Dmab vs those who received no BMA (21.8% vs 11.5%, P = .04). Patients who received Dmab had higher responses (48.0%) compared to those who received ZA (31.6%) and no BMA (35.0%), although not statistically significant (P = .3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to suggest an increased rate of severe irAE and potential synergistic anti-tumor effect of Dmab in combination with ICI in female patients with breast cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf134\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新兴研究表明,一些骨修饰剂(BMAs),如denosumab (Dmab),可以通过增加肿瘤浸润性T细胞和扩大T细胞库来调节免疫反应。尤其是女性乳腺癌患者,经常同时接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和BMAs的治疗。然而,bma对ICI患者免疫相关不良事件(irAE)和癌症结局的临床影响仍然知之甚少。材料与方法:纳入2017 - 2024年间接受派姆单抗治疗的女性乳腺癌患者。患者根据接受的BMA进行分类:唑来膦酸(ZA)、Dmab或无。BMA治疗被认为是在ICI之前的剂量间隔内接受的(ZA为12个月;Dmab为6个月),ICI治疗期间,或最后一次ICI剂量后1个月内。结果:在接受派姆单抗治疗的425名女性乳腺癌患者队列中,55名(12.9%)接受了Dmab, 31名(7.3%)接受了ZA, 339名(80.0%)未接受BMA。共有255名(60%)患者患有早期乳腺癌,170名(40%)患者患有转移性疾病。中位随访19.4个月后(95% CI, 17.5-20.8),接受Dmab治疗的患者发生严重irAE的比例高于未接受BMA治疗的患者(21.8% vs 11.5%, P = 0.04)。与接受ZA(31.6%)和未接受BMA(35.0%)的患者相比,接受Dmab的患者有更高的反应(48.0%),尽管没有统计学意义(P = .3)。结论:这是第一个表明Dmab联合ICI在女性乳腺癌患者中严重irAE发生率增加和潜在协同抗肿瘤作用的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and immune-related adverse events of pembrolizumab with bone-modifying agents in female patients with breast cancer.

Background: Emerging studies demonstrate that some bone-modifying agents (BMAs), such as denosumab (Dmab), can modulate immune responses by increasing tumor-infiltrating T cells and expanding the T-cell repertoire. Female patients with breast cancer in particular often receive concurrent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BMAs. However, the clinical impact of BMAs on immune-related adverse events (irAE) and cancer outcomes in patients treated with ICI remains poorly understood.

Materials and methods: Female patients with breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab between 2017 and 2024 were included. Patients were categorized according to BMA received: zoledronic acid (ZA), Dmab, or none. BMA therapy was considered received within a dose interval prior to ICI (12 months for ZA; 6 months for Dmab), during ICI therapy, or within 1 month of the last ICI dose.

Results: In a cohort of 425 female patients with breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab, 55 (12.9%) received Dmab, 31 (7.3%) received ZA, and 339 (80.0%) received no BMA. A total of 255 (60%) patients had early-stage breast cancer, and 170 (40%) had metastatic disease. After a median follow-up of 19.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-20.8), the incidence of severe irAE was higher in patients who received Dmab vs those who received no BMA (21.8% vs 11.5%, P = .04). Patients who received Dmab had higher responses (48.0%) compared to those who received ZA (31.6%) and no BMA (35.0%), although not statistically significant (P = .3).

Conclusion: This is the first study to suggest an increased rate of severe irAE and potential synergistic anti-tumor effect of Dmab in combination with ICI in female patients with breast cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信