Gerald Li, Stephanie B Greene, Baljinder Kaur, Rachel B Keller-Evans, Ryon P Graf, Brennan Decker, David L Smith, Richard S P Huang
{"title":"在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的综合基因组分析中,伴随诊断生物标志物的临床应用结果低于检测极限。","authors":"Gerald Li, Stephanie B Greene, Baljinder Kaur, Rachel B Keller-Evans, Ryon P Graf, Brennan Decker, David L Smith, Richard S P Huang","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When the limit of blank (LoB) of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for a given biomarker is acceptably demonstrated (ie, α ≤ 0.05 or LoB equal to zero), biomarkers detected below the assay limit of detection (LoD) can be reported with a high degree of confidence. However, it is unknown whether variants detected below LoD have clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study used a de-identified nationwide (US-based) non-small cell lung cancer clinico-genomic database (CGDB) containing linked FDA-approved CGP testing from Foundation Medicine, Inc (FMI). We selected patients who received an FMI CGP report with an actionable biomarker detected below LoD. We assessed clinical utility among those patients who received an appropriately matched targeted therapy, defined as a real-world overall response rate exceeding a prespecified threshold of 30% based on historical chemotherapy response rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 129 patients who had a biomarker detected and reported below LoD, received the appropriate matched targeted therapy, and were assessed for response, partial or complete response was observed in 36/54 (67%, one-tailed 95% CI: >55%, P < .001) patients tested with a tissue-based CGP test and 54/75 (72%, one-tailed 95% CI: >62%, P < .001) patients tested with a liquid-based CGP test, both of which exceeded the prespecified threshold for clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients who receive a targeted therapy matched to a companion diagnostic biomarker detected and reported below LoD demonstrate clinical benefit from that therapy. This clinical observation suggests actionable variants should continue to be reported when detected with FMI CGP tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of companion diagnostic biomarker results below the limit of detection in comprehensive genomic profiling of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Gerald Li, Stephanie B Greene, Baljinder Kaur, Rachel B Keller-Evans, Ryon P Graf, Brennan Decker, David L Smith, Richard S P Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When the limit of blank (LoB) of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for a given biomarker is acceptably demonstrated (ie, α ≤ 0.05 or LoB equal to zero), biomarkers detected below the assay limit of detection (LoD) can be reported with a high degree of confidence. However, it is unknown whether variants detected below LoD have clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study used a de-identified nationwide (US-based) non-small cell lung cancer clinico-genomic database (CGDB) containing linked FDA-approved CGP testing from Foundation Medicine, Inc (FMI). We selected patients who received an FMI CGP report with an actionable biomarker detected below LoD. We assessed clinical utility among those patients who received an appropriately matched targeted therapy, defined as a real-world overall response rate exceeding a prespecified threshold of 30% based on historical chemotherapy response rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 129 patients who had a biomarker detected and reported below LoD, received the appropriate matched targeted therapy, and were assessed for response, partial or complete response was observed in 36/54 (67%, one-tailed 95% CI: >55%, P < .001) patients tested with a tissue-based CGP test and 54/75 (72%, one-tailed 95% CI: >62%, P < .001) patients tested with a liquid-based CGP test, both of which exceeded the prespecified threshold for clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients who receive a targeted therapy matched to a companion diagnostic biomarker detected and reported below LoD demonstrate clinical benefit from that therapy. This clinical observation suggests actionable variants should continue to be reported when detected with FMI CGP tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf159\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:当给定生物标志物的综合基因组谱分析(CGP)空白限(LoB)可被接受地证明(即α≤0.05或LoB等于零)时,可以高度置信度地报告低于检测限(LoD)的生物标志物。然而,尚不清楚在LoD以下检测到的变异是否具有临床效用。患者和方法:本研究使用了一个去识别的全国性(美国)非小细胞肺癌临床基因组数据库(CGDB),其中包含美国fda批准的基础医学公司(FMI)的CGP检测。我们选择接受FMI CGP报告并在LoD以下检测到可操作的生物标志物的患者。我们评估了那些接受了适当匹配的靶向治疗的患者的临床效用,定义为基于历史化疗反应率的真实世界总体反应率超过预先设定的阈值30%。结果:在129例检测到生物标志物并报告低于LoD的患者中,接受了适当的匹配的靶向治疗,并评估了反应,在36/54(67%,单侧95% CI: >55%, P 62%, P)中观察到部分或完全缓解。结论:大多数接受与检测到并报告低于LoD的伴随诊断性生物标志物匹配的靶向治疗的患者显示出该治疗的临床获益。这一临床观察表明,当FMI CGP试验检测到可操作的变异时,应继续报告。
Clinical utility of companion diagnostic biomarker results below the limit of detection in comprehensive genomic profiling of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Background: When the limit of blank (LoB) of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for a given biomarker is acceptably demonstrated (ie, α ≤ 0.05 or LoB equal to zero), biomarkers detected below the assay limit of detection (LoD) can be reported with a high degree of confidence. However, it is unknown whether variants detected below LoD have clinical utility.
Patients and methods: This study used a de-identified nationwide (US-based) non-small cell lung cancer clinico-genomic database (CGDB) containing linked FDA-approved CGP testing from Foundation Medicine, Inc (FMI). We selected patients who received an FMI CGP report with an actionable biomarker detected below LoD. We assessed clinical utility among those patients who received an appropriately matched targeted therapy, defined as a real-world overall response rate exceeding a prespecified threshold of 30% based on historical chemotherapy response rates.
Results: Among 129 patients who had a biomarker detected and reported below LoD, received the appropriate matched targeted therapy, and were assessed for response, partial or complete response was observed in 36/54 (67%, one-tailed 95% CI: >55%, P < .001) patients tested with a tissue-based CGP test and 54/75 (72%, one-tailed 95% CI: >62%, P < .001) patients tested with a liquid-based CGP test, both of which exceeded the prespecified threshold for clinical utility.
Conclusions: Most patients who receive a targeted therapy matched to a companion diagnostic biomarker detected and reported below LoD demonstrate clinical benefit from that therapy. This clinical observation suggests actionable variants should continue to be reported when detected with FMI CGP tests.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.