医疗护理协调干预对患者激活的影响。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Samuel T Savitz, Michelle A Lampman, Shealeigh A Inselman, Vicki L Hunt, Angela B Mattson, Robert J Stroebel, Pamela J McCabe, Stephanie G Witwer, Bijan J Borah
{"title":"医疗护理协调干预对患者激活的影响。","authors":"Samuel T Savitz, Michelle A Lampman, Shealeigh A Inselman, Vicki L Hunt, Angela B Mattson, Robert J Stroebel, Pamela J McCabe, Stephanie G Witwer, Bijan J Borah","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of an adult medical care coordination (AMCC) intervention on patient activation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This observational evaluation compared AMCC with usual care (UC). Eligible patients were adults discharged home who had 2 or more chronic conditions and a high risk of readmission. AMCC involved registered nurse care coordinators providing self-management support to patients via 1 home visit and regular phone calls. The outcome was the 10-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM), a validated patient-reported outcome tool with 4 levels ranging from 1 (lower activation) to 4 (higher activation). Measurement occurred at baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated patient activation as an ordinal outcome using an ordered logistic regression model, a dichotomous outcome using a linear probability model, and a continuous outcome using ordinary least squares.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 915 (432 AMCC, 483 UC) patients who completed both the baseline and at least 1 follow-up PAM. For the ordinal analysis, AMCC was associated with a significant increase in the percentage with a PAM of level 3 at 30, 90, and 180 days and a decrease in the percentage with a PAM of level 1 or 2 at 180 days. For the dichotomous analysis, AMCC was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of patients with a PAM of level 3 or 4 at 180 days (15.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.6-24.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMCC significantly increased patient activation, particularly at the final measurement. These findings highlight the potential value of AMCC as a self-management intervention, enhancing patients' confidence to manage their health.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 6","pages":"279-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of medical care coordination intervention on patient activation.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel T Savitz, Michelle A Lampman, Shealeigh A Inselman, Vicki L Hunt, Angela B Mattson, Robert J Stroebel, Pamela J McCabe, Stephanie G Witwer, Bijan J Borah\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of an adult medical care coordination (AMCC) intervention on patient activation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This observational evaluation compared AMCC with usual care (UC). Eligible patients were adults discharged home who had 2 or more chronic conditions and a high risk of readmission. AMCC involved registered nurse care coordinators providing self-management support to patients via 1 home visit and regular phone calls. The outcome was the 10-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM), a validated patient-reported outcome tool with 4 levels ranging from 1 (lower activation) to 4 (higher activation). Measurement occurred at baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated patient activation as an ordinal outcome using an ordered logistic regression model, a dichotomous outcome using a linear probability model, and a continuous outcome using ordinary least squares.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 915 (432 AMCC, 483 UC) patients who completed both the baseline and at least 1 follow-up PAM. For the ordinal analysis, AMCC was associated with a significant increase in the percentage with a PAM of level 3 at 30, 90, and 180 days and a decrease in the percentage with a PAM of level 1 or 2 at 180 days. For the dichotomous analysis, AMCC was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of patients with a PAM of level 3 or 4 at 180 days (15.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.6-24.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMCC significantly increased patient activation, particularly at the final measurement. These findings highlight the potential value of AMCC as a self-management intervention, enhancing patients' confidence to manage their health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"279-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89747\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价成人医疗保健协调(AMCC)干预对患者激活的影响。研究设计:这项观察性评价比较了AMCC和常规护理(UC)。符合条件的患者是有2种或2种以上慢性疾病且再入院风险高的出院成人。AMCC包括注册护士护理协调员通过1次家访和定期电话为患者提供自我管理支持。结果是10项患者激活测量(PAM),这是一个经过验证的患者报告结果工具,分为4个级别,从1(低激活)到4(高激活)。在基线和30、90和180天进行测量。方法:我们使用有序逻辑回归模型评估患者激活为有序结果,使用线性概率模型评估患者激活为二分类结果,使用普通最小二乘评估患者激活为连续结果。结果:我们确定了915例(432例AMCC, 483例UC)患者完成了基线和至少1次随访PAM。对于顺序分析,AMCC与PAM在30、90和180天时3级的百分比显著增加有关,与PAM在180天时1级或2级的百分比减少有关。对于二分法分析,AMCC与180天时PAM为3级或4级的患者百分比显著增加相关(15.2个百分点;95% ci, 5.6-24.7)。结论:AMCC显著增加了患者的激活,特别是在最终测量时。这些发现突出了AMCC作为一种自我管理干预的潜在价值,增强了患者管理自己健康的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of medical care coordination intervention on patient activation.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of an adult medical care coordination (AMCC) intervention on patient activation.

Study design: This observational evaluation compared AMCC with usual care (UC). Eligible patients were adults discharged home who had 2 or more chronic conditions and a high risk of readmission. AMCC involved registered nurse care coordinators providing self-management support to patients via 1 home visit and regular phone calls. The outcome was the 10-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM), a validated patient-reported outcome tool with 4 levels ranging from 1 (lower activation) to 4 (higher activation). Measurement occurred at baseline and 30, 90, and 180 days.

Methods: We evaluated patient activation as an ordinal outcome using an ordered logistic regression model, a dichotomous outcome using a linear probability model, and a continuous outcome using ordinary least squares.

Results: We identified 915 (432 AMCC, 483 UC) patients who completed both the baseline and at least 1 follow-up PAM. For the ordinal analysis, AMCC was associated with a significant increase in the percentage with a PAM of level 3 at 30, 90, and 180 days and a decrease in the percentage with a PAM of level 1 or 2 at 180 days. For the dichotomous analysis, AMCC was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of patients with a PAM of level 3 or 4 at 180 days (15.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.6-24.7).

Conclusions: AMCC significantly increased patient activation, particularly at the final measurement. These findings highlight the potential value of AMCC as a self-management intervention, enhancing patients' confidence to manage their health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信