腹腔镜前列腺根治术的学习曲线。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17933
Anna Barnaś, Tomasz Milecki, Agnieszka Ida, Michał Kasperczak, Adam Lipski, Andrzej Antczak, Wojciech A Cieślikowski
{"title":"腹腔镜前列腺根治术的学习曲线。","authors":"Anna Barnaś, Tomasz Milecki, Agnieszka Ida, Michał Kasperczak, Adam Lipski, Andrzej Antczak, Wojciech A Cieślikowski","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While robotic prostatectomies are gaining popularity, laparoscopic and open surgeries remain prevalent in Central and Eastern Europe due to their cost‑effectiveness. In Poland, many urology residents report insufficient laparoscopic training. This study retrospectively evaluated the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper aimed to assess the learning curve of a single resident performing extraperitoneal LRP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 72 patients who underwent LRP between 2016 and 2020 at a single center, divided into 5 groups (G1-G5) according to chronological order. The procedures were per‑ formed by a single urologist without on‑site supervision. Outcomes included operative duration, length of hospital stay, complications, transfusion rates, histopathology findings, biochemical recurrence, and urinary incontinence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient characteristics were similar across all groups. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age ranged from 61 (54-66) to 68 (66-70) years, and the median (IQR) prostate‑specific antigen con‑ centration, from 6.7 (5.4-8.5) to 15 (6.3-19.3) ng/ml. Higher Gleason scores were more common in the G3 and G4 groups (P = 0.05) than in the other groups. Surgery time decreased from 183 minutes in the G1 group to 130 minutes in the G5 group (P <0.001). The rates of positive surgical margins were the highest in the G3 and G4 groups (53.3% and 46.7%, respectively; P = 0.02). The rate of urinary continence improved from 66.7% in the G1 group to 86.7% in the G4 group (P = 0.36); however, without any significant difference among all groups. Biochemical recurrence rates tended to be lower in the G4 and G5 groups (6.7% and 8.3%, respectively), but the difference across all groups was nonsignificant. Grade III-V complications occurred only in the G1 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical outcomes improved after 15 procedures, and the oncological outcomes, after 45, with functional improvement observed later. Performing hundreds of surgeries may be required to achieve high proficiency in performing LRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"20 1","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Barnaś, Tomasz Milecki, Agnieszka Ida, Michał Kasperczak, Adam Lipski, Andrzej Antczak, Wojciech A Cieślikowski\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While robotic prostatectomies are gaining popularity, laparoscopic and open surgeries remain prevalent in Central and Eastern Europe due to their cost‑effectiveness. In Poland, many urology residents report insufficient laparoscopic training. This study retrospectively evaluated the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper aimed to assess the learning curve of a single resident performing extraperitoneal LRP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 72 patients who underwent LRP between 2016 and 2020 at a single center, divided into 5 groups (G1-G5) according to chronological order. The procedures were per‑ formed by a single urologist without on‑site supervision. Outcomes included operative duration, length of hospital stay, complications, transfusion rates, histopathology findings, biochemical recurrence, and urinary incontinence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient characteristics were similar across all groups. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age ranged from 61 (54-66) to 68 (66-70) years, and the median (IQR) prostate‑specific antigen con‑ centration, from 6.7 (5.4-8.5) to 15 (6.3-19.3) ng/ml. Higher Gleason scores were more common in the G3 and G4 groups (P = 0.05) than in the other groups. Surgery time decreased from 183 minutes in the G1 group to 130 minutes in the G5 group (P <0.001). The rates of positive surgical margins were the highest in the G3 and G4 groups (53.3% and 46.7%, respectively; P = 0.02). The rate of urinary continence improved from 66.7% in the G1 group to 86.7% in the G4 group (P = 0.36); however, without any significant difference among all groups. Biochemical recurrence rates tended to be lower in the G4 and G5 groups (6.7% and 8.3%, respectively), but the difference across all groups was nonsignificant. Grade III-V complications occurred only in the G1 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical outcomes improved after 15 procedures, and the oncological outcomes, after 45, with functional improvement observed later. Performing hundreds of surgeries may be required to achieve high proficiency in performing LRP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"69-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17933\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:虽然机器人前列腺切除术越来越受欢迎,但由于其成本效益,腹腔镜和开放式手术在中欧和东欧仍然普遍存在。在波兰,许多泌尿科住院医师报告腹腔镜训练不足。本研究回顾性评估腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)的学习曲线。目的:本文旨在评估单个住院医师进行腹膜外LRP的学习曲线。材料和方法:我们分析了2016年至2020年在单一中心接受LRP的72例患者,根据时间顺序分为G1-G5组。手术由一名泌尿科医生完成,没有现场监督。结果包括手术时间、住院时间、并发症、输血率、组织病理学结果、生化复发和尿失禁。结果:各组患者特征相似。中位(四分位间距[IQR])年龄范围为61(54-66)至68(66-70)岁,中位(IQR)前列腺特异性抗原浓度范围为6.7(5.4-8.5)至15 (6.3-19.3)ng/ml。G3组和G4组的Gleason评分高于其他组(P = 0.05)。手术时间由G1组的183分钟缩短至G5组的130分钟(P)。结论:15次手术后手术效果改善,45次手术后肿瘤预后改善,随后观察功能改善。为了达到LRP的熟练程度,可能需要进行数百次手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Introduction: While robotic prostatectomies are gaining popularity, laparoscopic and open surgeries remain prevalent in Central and Eastern Europe due to their cost‑effectiveness. In Poland, many urology residents report insufficient laparoscopic training. This study retrospectively evaluated the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

Aim: This paper aimed to assess the learning curve of a single resident performing extraperitoneal LRP.

Materials and methods: We analyzed 72 patients who underwent LRP between 2016 and 2020 at a single center, divided into 5 groups (G1-G5) according to chronological order. The procedures were per‑ formed by a single urologist without on‑site supervision. Outcomes included operative duration, length of hospital stay, complications, transfusion rates, histopathology findings, biochemical recurrence, and urinary incontinence.

Results: Patient characteristics were similar across all groups. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age ranged from 61 (54-66) to 68 (66-70) years, and the median (IQR) prostate‑specific antigen con‑ centration, from 6.7 (5.4-8.5) to 15 (6.3-19.3) ng/ml. Higher Gleason scores were more common in the G3 and G4 groups (P = 0.05) than in the other groups. Surgery time decreased from 183 minutes in the G1 group to 130 minutes in the G5 group (P <0.001). The rates of positive surgical margins were the highest in the G3 and G4 groups (53.3% and 46.7%, respectively; P = 0.02). The rate of urinary continence improved from 66.7% in the G1 group to 86.7% in the G4 group (P = 0.36); however, without any significant difference among all groups. Biochemical recurrence rates tended to be lower in the G4 and G5 groups (6.7% and 8.3%, respectively), but the difference across all groups was nonsignificant. Grade III-V complications occurred only in the G1 group.

Conclusions: Surgical outcomes improved after 15 procedures, and the oncological outcomes, after 45, with functional improvement observed later. Performing hundreds of surgeries may be required to achieve high proficiency in performing LRP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信