内窥镜手术后的内窥镜手缝合:31例上、下胃肠道的早期结果(附视频)

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17928
Zofia Orzeszko, Przemysław Kasprzyk, Urszula Zawada, Mirosław Szura, Michał Spychalski
{"title":"内窥镜手术后的内窥镜手缝合:31例上、下胃肠道的早期结果(附视频)","authors":"Zofia Orzeszko, Przemysław Kasprzyk, Urszula Zawada, Mirosław Szura, Michał Spychalski","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) has emerged as a promising modality in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Reports on its effectiveness in clinical practice remain limited due to its recent adoption.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to describe a single- center experience regarding EHS and its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single -center retrospective study analyzed individuals that underwent advanced endoscopic procedures in the upper and lower GI tract followed by EHS. Defined features (suturing time and speed) and outcomes (postprocedural bleeding, abdominal pain) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty- one patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) size of the resected lesions was 20 (20-30) mm, and the median (IQR) diameter of the sutured defects was 25 (20-31) mm. The overall suturing time was 25 minutes, with a mean (SD) speed of 1.12 (0.5) mm/min. It varied in different locations, with the fastest closure in the proximal stomach (mean [SD], 25 [13.1] min; 1.27 [0.32] mm/min) and the longest in the rectum (mean [SD], 33 [16.2] min; 0.92 [0.4] mm/min). No symptoms of GI bleeding were reported during early and 4-week follow-up. One case (4.5%) of abdominal pain was reported for the upper GI tract, and none for the lower GI tract.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHS is a safe and effective technique for managing defects in both gastric and rectal advanced endoscopic procedures. Its potential application in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in high-risk patients is promising. The duration and complexity of the procedure remain the challenges that may limit its broader adoption. Further research and standardized training are imperative to optimize EHS outcomes and establish it as a routine practice in endoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"20 1","pages":"44-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic hand suturing after advanced endoscopic procedures: early outcomes of 31 cases in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract (with video).\",\"authors\":\"Zofia Orzeszko, Przemysław Kasprzyk, Urszula Zawada, Mirosław Szura, Michał Spychalski\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) has emerged as a promising modality in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Reports on its effectiveness in clinical practice remain limited due to its recent adoption.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to describe a single- center experience regarding EHS and its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single -center retrospective study analyzed individuals that underwent advanced endoscopic procedures in the upper and lower GI tract followed by EHS. Defined features (suturing time and speed) and outcomes (postprocedural bleeding, abdominal pain) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty- one patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) size of the resected lesions was 20 (20-30) mm, and the median (IQR) diameter of the sutured defects was 25 (20-31) mm. The overall suturing time was 25 minutes, with a mean (SD) speed of 1.12 (0.5) mm/min. It varied in different locations, with the fastest closure in the proximal stomach (mean [SD], 25 [13.1] min; 1.27 [0.32] mm/min) and the longest in the rectum (mean [SD], 33 [16.2] min; 0.92 [0.4] mm/min). No symptoms of GI bleeding were reported during early and 4-week follow-up. One case (4.5%) of abdominal pain was reported for the upper GI tract, and none for the lower GI tract.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHS is a safe and effective technique for managing defects in both gastric and rectal advanced endoscopic procedures. Its potential application in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in high-risk patients is promising. The duration and complexity of the procedure remain the challenges that may limit its broader adoption. Further research and standardized training are imperative to optimize EHS outcomes and establish it as a routine practice in endoscopic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"44-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17928\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内窥镜手缝合(EHS)已成为胃肠道(GI)内窥镜手术的一种有前途的方式。由于它最近才被采用,关于它在临床实践中的有效性的报告仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在描述一个关于EHS的单中心经验及其结果。材料和方法:这项单中心回顾性研究分析了在上、下消化道接受先进内窥镜手术后发生EHS的患者。评估确定的特征(缝合时间和速度)和结果(术后出血、腹痛)。结果:31例患者纳入分析。切除病灶的中位数(四分位间距[IQR])大小为20 (20-30)mm,缝合缺损的中位数(IQR)直径为25 (20-31)mm,总缝合时间为25分钟,平均(SD)速度为1.12 (0.5)mm/min。不同部位闭合速度不同,胃近端闭合速度最快(mean [SD], 25 [13.1] min;1.27 [0.32] mm/min),直肠最长(平均[SD] 33 [16.2] min;0.92 [0.4] mm/min)。在早期和4周的随访中均未报告胃肠道出血症状。据报道,1例(4.5%)腹痛发生在上消化道,没有一例发生在下消化道。结论:EHS是一种安全有效的处理胃和直肠高级内镜手术缺陷的技术。其在预防高危患者内镜后粘膜下夹层出血方面的应用前景广阔。该程序的持续时间和复杂性仍然是可能限制其广泛采用的挑战。进一步的研究和规范化培训是优化EHS结果并使其成为内镜手术常规做法的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic hand suturing after advanced endoscopic procedures: early outcomes of 31 cases in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract (with video).

Introduction: Endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) has emerged as a promising modality in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Reports on its effectiveness in clinical practice remain limited due to its recent adoption.

Aim: This study aimed to describe a single- center experience regarding EHS and its outcomes.

Materials and methods: This single -center retrospective study analyzed individuals that underwent advanced endoscopic procedures in the upper and lower GI tract followed by EHS. Defined features (suturing time and speed) and outcomes (postprocedural bleeding, abdominal pain) were assessed.

Results: Thirty- one patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) size of the resected lesions was 20 (20-30) mm, and the median (IQR) diameter of the sutured defects was 25 (20-31) mm. The overall suturing time was 25 minutes, with a mean (SD) speed of 1.12 (0.5) mm/min. It varied in different locations, with the fastest closure in the proximal stomach (mean [SD], 25 [13.1] min; 1.27 [0.32] mm/min) and the longest in the rectum (mean [SD], 33 [16.2] min; 0.92 [0.4] mm/min). No symptoms of GI bleeding were reported during early and 4-week follow-up. One case (4.5%) of abdominal pain was reported for the upper GI tract, and none for the lower GI tract.

Conclusions: EHS is a safe and effective technique for managing defects in both gastric and rectal advanced endoscopic procedures. Its potential application in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in high-risk patients is promising. The duration and complexity of the procedure remain the challenges that may limit its broader adoption. Further research and standardized training are imperative to optimize EHS outcomes and establish it as a routine practice in endoscopic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信