一项回顾性队列研究比较了MiniMizer额外可调节胃带的不同固定方法。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937
Žygimantas Juodeikis, Gintautas Brimas
{"title":"一项回顾性队列研究比较了MiniMizer额外可调节胃带的不同固定方法。","authors":"Žygimantas Juodeikis, Gintautas Brimas","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Two decades ago, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding was a leading bariatric sur‑ gery. However, its popularity has declined, with sleeve gastrectomy becoming the predominant choice. The MiniMizer Extra band used in our clinic from 2008 to 2020 was associated with band erosion primarily at its lower edge. In 2014, we started using a modified band fixation technique by placing sutures only on the upper part of the band.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare 2 different fixation techniques for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band to identify any potential differences in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, we compared 54 patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding with the MiniMizer Extra band between January 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, with a group of 54 patients who were subjected to the procedure between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2019, using a different band fixation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weight loss results significantly favored the modified fixation group, with an average total weight loss of 24.2%. The overall complication rate was 12% and was significantly higher in the original fixation group. Complications included 6 cases of band erosion, 4 port‑related issues, 1 case of band slippage, and 2 cases of band intolerance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified fixation group demonstrated improved weight loss results with fewer com‑ plications, suggesting a potential advantage in safety and efficacy of the modified technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"20 1","pages":"51-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective cohort study comparing different fixation methods for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band.\",\"authors\":\"Žygimantas Juodeikis, Gintautas Brimas\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Two decades ago, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding was a leading bariatric sur‑ gery. However, its popularity has declined, with sleeve gastrectomy becoming the predominant choice. The MiniMizer Extra band used in our clinic from 2008 to 2020 was associated with band erosion primarily at its lower edge. In 2014, we started using a modified band fixation technique by placing sutures only on the upper part of the band.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare 2 different fixation techniques for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band to identify any potential differences in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, we compared 54 patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding with the MiniMizer Extra band between January 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, with a group of 54 patients who were subjected to the procedure between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2019, using a different band fixation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weight loss results significantly favored the modified fixation group, with an average total weight loss of 24.2%. The overall complication rate was 12% and was significantly higher in the original fixation group. Complications included 6 cases of band erosion, 4 port‑related issues, 1 case of band slippage, and 2 cases of band intolerance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified fixation group demonstrated improved weight loss results with fewer com‑ plications, suggesting a potential advantage in safety and efficacy of the modified technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"51-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:二十年前,腹腔镜可调节胃束带是一种领先的减肥手术。然而,它的受欢迎程度已经下降,袖胃切除术成为主要的选择。从2008年到2020年在我们诊所使用的MiniMizer Extra带主要在其下边缘与带糜烂有关。2014年,我们开始使用改良的带固定技术,仅在带的上部缝合。目的:本研究的目的是比较MiniMizer额外可调节胃束带的两种不同固定技术,以确定任何潜在的结果差异。材料和方法:在本研究中,我们比较了2009年1月1日至2010年1月31日期间使用MiniMizer Extra带进行可调节胃束带的54例患者,以及2014年1月1日至2019年1月31日期间使用不同带固定方法进行胃束带固定的54例患者。结果:改良固定组体重减轻效果明显,平均总体重减轻24.2%。总并发症发生率为12%,原始固定组明显高于原始固定组。并发症包括6例带糜烂,4例端口相关问题,1例带滑脱,2例带不耐受。结论:改良固定组减重效果明显,并发症较少,提示改良技术在安全性和有效性方面具有潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A retrospective cohort study comparing different fixation methods for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band.

A retrospective cohort study comparing different fixation methods for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band.

Introduction: Two decades ago, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding was a leading bariatric sur‑ gery. However, its popularity has declined, with sleeve gastrectomy becoming the predominant choice. The MiniMizer Extra band used in our clinic from 2008 to 2020 was associated with band erosion primarily at its lower edge. In 2014, we started using a modified band fixation technique by placing sutures only on the upper part of the band.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare 2 different fixation techniques for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band to identify any potential differences in outcomes.

Materials and methods: In this study, we compared 54 patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding with the MiniMizer Extra band between January 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, with a group of 54 patients who were subjected to the procedure between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2019, using a different band fixation method.

Results: Weight loss results significantly favored the modified fixation group, with an average total weight loss of 24.2%. The overall complication rate was 12% and was significantly higher in the original fixation group. Complications included 6 cases of band erosion, 4 port‑related issues, 1 case of band slippage, and 2 cases of band intolerance.

Conclusions: The modified fixation group demonstrated improved weight loss results with fewer com‑ plications, suggesting a potential advantage in safety and efficacy of the modified technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信