Alexandra Papaelias, Darcy Lidington, Steffen-Sebastian Bolz
{"title":"在健康受试者中证明Lumacaftor单物质制剂与Orkambi®(Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor)的生物等效性。","authors":"Alexandra Papaelias, Darcy Lidington, Steffen-Sebastian Bolz","doi":"10.1007/s40268-025-00514-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Lumacaftor is an active ingredient in the US Food and Drug Administration-approved combination medication Orkambi<sup>®</sup>, which is used for treating cystic fibrosis. Experimental evidence suggests that lumacaftor can be used as a monotherapy to improve brain perfusion and memory in heart failure. To clinically assess this therapeutic intervention, a formulation with demonstrated bioequivalence to the currently approved combination product is required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative bioavailability and food-effect study compared lumacaftor pharmacokinetics in healthy patients following: (i) oral administration of lumacaftor (400 mg; Test Product) or Orkambi<sup>®</sup> (lumacaftor 400 mg/ivacaftor 250 mg; Reference Product) in the fed state and (ii) oral administration of lumacaftor (400 mg; Test Product) in the fasted to fed state. Plasma lumacaftor concentrations were measured with a standard liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"Test-to-Reference ratio\" of the geometric least-square means for maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve met the Food and Drug Administration-defined criteria for bioequivalence; median times to maximum plasma concentration values were not statistically different. The \"Fed to Fasted ratio\" of the geometric least-square means for maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve indicated a clear food effect on bioavailability. Lumacaftor exposure was approximately two times higher when administered with fatty foods than when taken in a fasting state. The monosubstance formulation was well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the lumacaftor monosubstance formulation delivers lumacaftor exposure that is not meaningfully different than the currently approved combination product.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05968612.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demonstrating Bioequivalence for a Lumacaftor Monosubstance Formulation Versus Orkambi<sup>®</sup> (Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor) in Healthy Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Papaelias, Darcy Lidington, Steffen-Sebastian Bolz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40268-025-00514-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Lumacaftor is an active ingredient in the US Food and Drug Administration-approved combination medication Orkambi<sup>®</sup>, which is used for treating cystic fibrosis. Experimental evidence suggests that lumacaftor can be used as a monotherapy to improve brain perfusion and memory in heart failure. To clinically assess this therapeutic intervention, a formulation with demonstrated bioequivalence to the currently approved combination product is required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative bioavailability and food-effect study compared lumacaftor pharmacokinetics in healthy patients following: (i) oral administration of lumacaftor (400 mg; Test Product) or Orkambi<sup>®</sup> (lumacaftor 400 mg/ivacaftor 250 mg; Reference Product) in the fed state and (ii) oral administration of lumacaftor (400 mg; Test Product) in the fasted to fed state. Plasma lumacaftor concentrations were measured with a standard liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \\\"Test-to-Reference ratio\\\" of the geometric least-square means for maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve met the Food and Drug Administration-defined criteria for bioequivalence; median times to maximum plasma concentration values were not statistically different. The \\\"Fed to Fasted ratio\\\" of the geometric least-square means for maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve indicated a clear food effect on bioavailability. Lumacaftor exposure was approximately two times higher when administered with fatty foods than when taken in a fasting state. The monosubstance formulation was well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the lumacaftor monosubstance formulation delivers lumacaftor exposure that is not meaningfully different than the currently approved combination product.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05968612.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-025-00514-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-025-00514-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Demonstrating Bioequivalence for a Lumacaftor Monosubstance Formulation Versus Orkambi® (Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor) in Healthy Subjects.
Background and objective: Lumacaftor is an active ingredient in the US Food and Drug Administration-approved combination medication Orkambi®, which is used for treating cystic fibrosis. Experimental evidence suggests that lumacaftor can be used as a monotherapy to improve brain perfusion and memory in heart failure. To clinically assess this therapeutic intervention, a formulation with demonstrated bioequivalence to the currently approved combination product is required.
Methods: This comparative bioavailability and food-effect study compared lumacaftor pharmacokinetics in healthy patients following: (i) oral administration of lumacaftor (400 mg; Test Product) or Orkambi® (lumacaftor 400 mg/ivacaftor 250 mg; Reference Product) in the fed state and (ii) oral administration of lumacaftor (400 mg; Test Product) in the fasted to fed state. Plasma lumacaftor concentrations were measured with a standard liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry approach.
Results: The "Test-to-Reference ratio" of the geometric least-square means for maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve met the Food and Drug Administration-defined criteria for bioequivalence; median times to maximum plasma concentration values were not statistically different. The "Fed to Fasted ratio" of the geometric least-square means for maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve indicated a clear food effect on bioavailability. Lumacaftor exposure was approximately two times higher when administered with fatty foods than when taken in a fasting state. The monosubstance formulation was well tolerated.
Conclusions: We conclude that the lumacaftor monosubstance formulation delivers lumacaftor exposure that is not meaningfully different than the currently approved combination product.
期刊介绍:
Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy.
The Journal includes:
Clinical research on new and established drugs;
Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development;
Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered;
Reviews may also be considered.