糖尿病足风险的未来:揭示预测性连续血糖监测生物标志物。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Haewon Byeon
{"title":"糖尿病足风险的未来:揭示预测性连续血糖监测生物标志物。","authors":"Haewon Byeon","doi":"10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.107006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study critically analyzes the findings of Geng <i>et al</i>, which investigated the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and the risk of diabetic foot (DF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study demonstrated significant associations between lower time in range, higher glycemic risk index, mean blood glucose, and time above range and an increased risk of DF. While acknowledging the study's strengths, such as its large sample size and robust statistical methods, this analysis also highlights its limitations, including its cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported data. The findings are discussed within the framework of established theories, including the concepts of metabolic memory, the glucocentric paradigm, and the role of inflammation. This analysis emphasizes that a comprehensive approach to glucose management, extending beyond traditional glycated hemoglobin A1c measurements, is crucial for DF risk mitigation. Recognizing the impact of poor adherence and ongoing inflammation, future research should prioritize exploring causal mechanisms, the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving CGM metrics, and the specific contributions of glucose variability to DF development. In conclusion, these findings strongly support the clinical application of diverse CGM metrics to enhance patient outcomes and effectively manage the risk of DF.</p>","PeriodicalId":48607,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Diabetes","volume":"16 6","pages":"107006"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future of diabetic foot risk: Unveiling predictive continuous glucose monitoring biomarkers.\",\"authors\":\"Haewon Byeon\",\"doi\":\"10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.107006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study critically analyzes the findings of Geng <i>et al</i>, which investigated the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and the risk of diabetic foot (DF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study demonstrated significant associations between lower time in range, higher glycemic risk index, mean blood glucose, and time above range and an increased risk of DF. While acknowledging the study's strengths, such as its large sample size and robust statistical methods, this analysis also highlights its limitations, including its cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported data. The findings are discussed within the framework of established theories, including the concepts of metabolic memory, the glucocentric paradigm, and the role of inflammation. This analysis emphasizes that a comprehensive approach to glucose management, extending beyond traditional glycated hemoglobin A1c measurements, is crucial for DF risk mitigation. Recognizing the impact of poor adherence and ongoing inflammation, future research should prioritize exploring causal mechanisms, the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving CGM metrics, and the specific contributions of glucose variability to DF development. In conclusion, these findings strongly support the clinical application of diverse CGM metrics to enhance patient outcomes and effectively manage the risk of DF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"107006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.107006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.107006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究批判性地分析了耿等人的研究结果,该研究调查了2型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测(CGM)指标与糖尿病足(DF)风险之间的关系。研究表明,较低的范围时间、较高的血糖危险指数、平均血糖和高于范围的时间与DF风险增加之间存在显著关联。虽然承认这项研究的优势,比如它的大样本量和可靠的统计方法,但这项分析也强调了它的局限性,包括它的横截面设计和对自我报告数据的依赖。研究结果在现有理论的框架内进行了讨论,包括代谢记忆的概念、糖中心范式和炎症的作用。该分析强调,在传统糖化血红蛋白A1c测量之外,采用全面的血糖管理方法对降低糖尿病风险至关重要。认识到不良依从性和持续炎症的影响,未来的研究应优先探索因果机制,旨在改善CGM指标的干预措施的有效性,以及葡萄糖变异性对DF发展的具体贡献。总之,这些发现有力地支持了多种CGM指标的临床应用,以提高患者的预后并有效地管理DF的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Future of diabetic foot risk: Unveiling predictive continuous glucose monitoring biomarkers.

This study critically analyzes the findings of Geng et al, which investigated the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and the risk of diabetic foot (DF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study demonstrated significant associations between lower time in range, higher glycemic risk index, mean blood glucose, and time above range and an increased risk of DF. While acknowledging the study's strengths, such as its large sample size and robust statistical methods, this analysis also highlights its limitations, including its cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported data. The findings are discussed within the framework of established theories, including the concepts of metabolic memory, the glucocentric paradigm, and the role of inflammation. This analysis emphasizes that a comprehensive approach to glucose management, extending beyond traditional glycated hemoglobin A1c measurements, is crucial for DF risk mitigation. Recognizing the impact of poor adherence and ongoing inflammation, future research should prioritize exploring causal mechanisms, the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving CGM metrics, and the specific contributions of glucose variability to DF development. In conclusion, these findings strongly support the clinical application of diverse CGM metrics to enhance patient outcomes and effectively manage the risk of DF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Diabetes
World Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
自引率
2.40%
发文量
909
期刊介绍: The WJD is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJD is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of diabetes. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJD is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJD are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in diabetes. Scope: Diabetes Complications, Experimental Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Cardiomyopathies, Diabetic Coma, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Neuropathies, Donohue Syndrome, Fetal Macrosomia, and Prediabetic State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信