溃疡性结肠炎患者对疾病活动性的感知与内镜评估之间的不一致。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-06-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848251346258
Boilève Juliette, Trang-Poisson Caroline, Flamant Mathurin, Bouguen Guillaume, Goronflot Thomas, Freyssinet Marie, Kerdreux Elise, Bourreille Arnaud, Le Berre Catherine
{"title":"溃疡性结肠炎患者对疾病活动性的感知与内镜评估之间的不一致。","authors":"Boilève Juliette, Trang-Poisson Caroline, Flamant Mathurin, Bouguen Guillaume, Goronflot Thomas, Freyssinet Marie, Kerdreux Elise, Bourreille Arnaud, Le Berre Catherine","doi":"10.1177/17562848251346258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrepancies between symptoms and endoscopy exist in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Most studies focused on patient-reported outcomes-2 rather than their overall perception of disease activity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives were to assess the concordance between the patient global assessment (PtGA) and the endoscopic evaluation, to analyse the factors associated with agreement and to describe the concordance between the patient's and the physician's perception of UC activity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with UC were consecutively included at the time of flexible sigmoidoscopy. The concordance between the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and the PtGA was evaluated. The factors related to concordance were investigated, including the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-Disk items that were completed by all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 104 analysable patients, 32.7% demonstrated complete alignment with the MES. The more the disease was objectively active, the more the patients were concordant, as reflected by the statistically significant differences between concordant and discordant patients in the median (interquartile range) MES (2 (1-2) vs 1 (0-2), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002)), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (3 (2-5) vs 1 (0-3), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.001)) and physician global assessment (whether on a qualitative scale as part of the Mayo score (<i>p</i> = 0.003) or on a 10 cm-visual analogue scale: (4 (1-6) vs 1 (0-3), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001)). Over two-thirds of discordant patients perceived their disease as more severe than the endoscopy suggested. While stool frequency did not differ between concordant and discordant patients (<i>p</i> = 0.093), rectal bleeding (<i>p</i> = 0.002) - predictably - and more interestingly, abdominal pain (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and bowel urgency (<i>p</i> = 0.006), emerged as symptoms strongly associated with improved concordance between patient perception and endoscopic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discrepancies between patient-reported disease activity and endoscopy are prevalent in UC. In addition to rectal bleeding, abdominal pain and bowel urgency may be more accurate to reflect clinical disease activity than stool frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848251346258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discordance between patients' perception and endoscopic assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.\",\"authors\":\"Boilève Juliette, Trang-Poisson Caroline, Flamant Mathurin, Bouguen Guillaume, Goronflot Thomas, Freyssinet Marie, Kerdreux Elise, Bourreille Arnaud, Le Berre Catherine\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848251346258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrepancies between symptoms and endoscopy exist in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Most studies focused on patient-reported outcomes-2 rather than their overall perception of disease activity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives were to assess the concordance between the patient global assessment (PtGA) and the endoscopic evaluation, to analyse the factors associated with agreement and to describe the concordance between the patient's and the physician's perception of UC activity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with UC were consecutively included at the time of flexible sigmoidoscopy. The concordance between the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and the PtGA was evaluated. The factors related to concordance were investigated, including the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-Disk items that were completed by all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 104 analysable patients, 32.7% demonstrated complete alignment with the MES. The more the disease was objectively active, the more the patients were concordant, as reflected by the statistically significant differences between concordant and discordant patients in the median (interquartile range) MES (2 (1-2) vs 1 (0-2), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002)), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (3 (2-5) vs 1 (0-3), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.001)) and physician global assessment (whether on a qualitative scale as part of the Mayo score (<i>p</i> = 0.003) or on a 10 cm-visual analogue scale: (4 (1-6) vs 1 (0-3), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001)). Over two-thirds of discordant patients perceived their disease as more severe than the endoscopy suggested. While stool frequency did not differ between concordant and discordant patients (<i>p</i> = 0.093), rectal bleeding (<i>p</i> = 0.002) - predictably - and more interestingly, abdominal pain (<i>p</i> = 0.006) and bowel urgency (<i>p</i> = 0.006), emerged as symptoms strongly associated with improved concordance between patient perception and endoscopic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discrepancies between patient-reported disease activity and endoscopy are prevalent in UC. In addition to rectal bleeding, abdominal pain and bowel urgency may be more accurate to reflect clinical disease activity than stool frequency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"17562848251346258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251346258\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251346258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的症状与内窥镜检查存在差异。大多数研究关注的是患者报告的结果,而不是他们对疾病活动的整体感知。目的:目的是评估患者整体评估(PtGA)和内镜评估之间的一致性,分析与一致性相关的因素,并描述患者和医生对UC活动的感知之间的一致性。设计:前瞻性观察性研究。方法:连续纳入柔性乙状结肠镜检查时的UC患者。评估Mayo内镜评分(MES)与PtGA的一致性。研究了与一致性相关的因素,包括所有患者完成的炎症性肠病(IBD)-Disk项目。结果:在104例可分析的患者中,32.7%的患者与MES完全一致。疾病客观上越活跃,患者越和谐,和谐患者与不和谐患者在MES中位数(四分位数范围)(分别为2 (1-2)vs 1 (0-2) (p = 0.002)、溃疡性结肠炎内镜下严重程度指数(3 (2-5)vs 1(0-3)、(p = 0.001))和医生整体评估(无论是定性量表作为Mayo评分的一部分(p = 0.003)还是10厘米视觉模拟量表:分别为(4 (1-6)vs 1 (0-3) (p = 0.093)),直肠出血(p = 0.002) -可预测-更有趣的是,腹痛(p = 0.006)和肠急症(p = 0.006),出现的症状与患者感知和内窥镜评估之间一致性的改善密切相关。结论:UC患者报告的疾病活动性与内镜检查之间的差异是普遍存在的。除了直肠出血外,腹痛和肠道急症可能比大便频率更准确地反映临床疾病的活动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Discordance between patients' perception and endoscopic assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

Discordance between patients' perception and endoscopic assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

Discordance between patients' perception and endoscopic assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

Discordance between patients' perception and endoscopic assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

Background: Discrepancies between symptoms and endoscopy exist in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Most studies focused on patient-reported outcomes-2 rather than their overall perception of disease activity.

Objectives: The objectives were to assess the concordance between the patient global assessment (PtGA) and the endoscopic evaluation, to analyse the factors associated with agreement and to describe the concordance between the patient's and the physician's perception of UC activity.

Design: Prospective, observational study.

Methods: Patients with UC were consecutively included at the time of flexible sigmoidoscopy. The concordance between the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and the PtGA was evaluated. The factors related to concordance were investigated, including the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-Disk items that were completed by all patients.

Results: Out of 104 analysable patients, 32.7% demonstrated complete alignment with the MES. The more the disease was objectively active, the more the patients were concordant, as reflected by the statistically significant differences between concordant and discordant patients in the median (interquartile range) MES (2 (1-2) vs 1 (0-2), respectively (p = 0.002)), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (3 (2-5) vs 1 (0-3), respectively (p = 0.001)) and physician global assessment (whether on a qualitative scale as part of the Mayo score (p = 0.003) or on a 10 cm-visual analogue scale: (4 (1-6) vs 1 (0-3), respectively (p < 0.001)). Over two-thirds of discordant patients perceived their disease as more severe than the endoscopy suggested. While stool frequency did not differ between concordant and discordant patients (p = 0.093), rectal bleeding (p = 0.002) - predictably - and more interestingly, abdominal pain (p = 0.006) and bowel urgency (p = 0.006), emerged as symptoms strongly associated with improved concordance between patient perception and endoscopic evaluation.

Conclusion: Discrepancies between patient-reported disease activity and endoscopy are prevalent in UC. In addition to rectal bleeding, abdominal pain and bowel urgency may be more accurate to reflect clinical disease activity than stool frequency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信