保护骨科医生:辐射安全实践、知识和风险的机构回顾。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00042
Marfred M Umanes, Elizabeth O Clayton, Brenda Iglesias, Emily A Whicker, Z Deniz Olgun, William Donaldson, MaCalus Hogan
{"title":"保护骨科医生:辐射安全实践、知识和风险的机构回顾。","authors":"Marfred M Umanes, Elizabeth O Clayton, Brenda Iglesias, Emily A Whicker, Z Deniz Olgun, William Donaldson, MaCalus Hogan","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons are among the top 3 medical professionals most exposed to ionizing radiation and must minimize the risks of ionizing radiation to patients, themselves, and staff. Best practice principles, including \"As low as reasonably achievable\" (ALARA), guide clinical practice, ensuring radiation exposure is clinically justified and performed by trained professionals. Currently, few studies assess radiation knowledge among academic orthopaedic surgery departments. The aims of this study are to investigate the radiation fund of knowledge and safety practices within an academic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and identify the availability of and level of satisfaction with communal lead personal protective equipment (PPE) at the various hospital locations associated with the academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A REDCap anonymous web-based survey was given to orthopaedic surgery residents, fellows, physician assistants, faculty, and others within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Data on knowledge of radiation safety training and best operating practices were collected. Knowledge and practice scores were calculated. ANOVA and <i>t</i>-test analyses were used to compare score outcomes between adequately and inadequately trained personnel, with a p-value <0.05 indicating statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight orthopaedic surgery personnel responded to the survey: 21 (36.21%) residents, 9 (15.52%) fellows, 5 (8.62%) professors, 6 (10.34%) associate professors, 6 (10.34%) assistant professors, and 11 (18.97%) physician assistants. The average knowledge and practice scores were 9.72/20 and 19.63/48 points, respectively. Comparison of scores based on self-reported adequacy level of training on radiation safety was statistically significant. PPE availability was low (43.11%), although satisfaction with communal lead aprons was high (60.8%) across hospital locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an opportunity to enhance radiation safety knowledge and practices among the personnel of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the academic institution. Communal PPE availability across hospital locations also warrants improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting the Orthopaedic Surgeon: An Institutional Review of Radiation Safety Practices, Knowledge, and Risks.\",\"authors\":\"Marfred M Umanes, Elizabeth O Clayton, Brenda Iglesias, Emily A Whicker, Z Deniz Olgun, William Donaldson, MaCalus Hogan\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons are among the top 3 medical professionals most exposed to ionizing radiation and must minimize the risks of ionizing radiation to patients, themselves, and staff. Best practice principles, including \\\"As low as reasonably achievable\\\" (ALARA), guide clinical practice, ensuring radiation exposure is clinically justified and performed by trained professionals. Currently, few studies assess radiation knowledge among academic orthopaedic surgery departments. The aims of this study are to investigate the radiation fund of knowledge and safety practices within an academic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and identify the availability of and level of satisfaction with communal lead personal protective equipment (PPE) at the various hospital locations associated with the academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A REDCap anonymous web-based survey was given to orthopaedic surgery residents, fellows, physician assistants, faculty, and others within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Data on knowledge of radiation safety training and best operating practices were collected. Knowledge and practice scores were calculated. ANOVA and <i>t</i>-test analyses were used to compare score outcomes between adequately and inadequately trained personnel, with a p-value <0.05 indicating statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight orthopaedic surgery personnel responded to the survey: 21 (36.21%) residents, 9 (15.52%) fellows, 5 (8.62%) professors, 6 (10.34%) associate professors, 6 (10.34%) assistant professors, and 11 (18.97%) physician assistants. The average knowledge and practice scores were 9.72/20 and 19.63/48 points, respectively. Comparison of scores based on self-reported adequacy level of training on radiation safety was statistically significant. PPE availability was low (43.11%), although satisfaction with communal lead aprons was high (60.8%) across hospital locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an opportunity to enhance radiation safety knowledge and practices among the personnel of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the academic institution. Communal PPE availability across hospital locations also warrants improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨科医生是暴露于电离辐射的前三大医疗专业之一,必须尽量减少电离辐射对患者、自身和工作人员的风险。最佳实践原则,包括“尽可能低”(ALARA),指导临床实践,确保辐射暴露在临床上是合理的,并由训练有素的专业人员执行。目前,学术骨科对放射知识的评估研究较少。本研究的目的是调查骨科学术部门的辐射知识和安全实践,并确定与该学术机构相关的各个医院的公共铅个人防护设备(PPE)的可用性和满意度。方法:REDCap对骨科住院医师、研究员、医师助理、教师和骨科内的其他人员进行匿名网络调查。收集有关辐射安全培训知识及最佳操作方法的资料。计算知识和实践分数。结果:58名骨科人员参与调查,其中住院医师21人(36.21%),研究员9人(15.52%),教授5人(8.62%),副教授6人(10.34%),助理教授6人(10.34%),医师助理11人(18.97%)。平均知识和实践得分分别为9.72/20分和19.63/48分。基于自我报告的辐射安全培训充分性水平的得分比较具有统计学意义。尽管各医院对公共铅围裙的满意度很高(60.8%),但个人防护装备的可得性较低(43.11%)。结论:该学术机构骨科人员有机会加强辐射安全知识和实践。各医院的公共个人防护装备可用性也有待改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protecting the Orthopaedic Surgeon: An Institutional Review of Radiation Safety Practices, Knowledge, and Risks.

Background: Orthopaedic surgeons are among the top 3 medical professionals most exposed to ionizing radiation and must minimize the risks of ionizing radiation to patients, themselves, and staff. Best practice principles, including "As low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA), guide clinical practice, ensuring radiation exposure is clinically justified and performed by trained professionals. Currently, few studies assess radiation knowledge among academic orthopaedic surgery departments. The aims of this study are to investigate the radiation fund of knowledge and safety practices within an academic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and identify the availability of and level of satisfaction with communal lead personal protective equipment (PPE) at the various hospital locations associated with the academic institution.

Methods: A REDCap anonymous web-based survey was given to orthopaedic surgery residents, fellows, physician assistants, faculty, and others within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Data on knowledge of radiation safety training and best operating practices were collected. Knowledge and practice scores were calculated. ANOVA and t-test analyses were used to compare score outcomes between adequately and inadequately trained personnel, with a p-value <0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results: Fifty-eight orthopaedic surgery personnel responded to the survey: 21 (36.21%) residents, 9 (15.52%) fellows, 5 (8.62%) professors, 6 (10.34%) associate professors, 6 (10.34%) assistant professors, and 11 (18.97%) physician assistants. The average knowledge and practice scores were 9.72/20 and 19.63/48 points, respectively. Comparison of scores based on self-reported adequacy level of training on radiation safety was statistically significant. PPE availability was low (43.11%), although satisfaction with communal lead aprons was high (60.8%) across hospital locations.

Conclusion: There is an opportunity to enhance radiation safety knowledge and practices among the personnel of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the academic institution. Communal PPE availability across hospital locations also warrants improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信