使用生物标志物诊断败血症相关脑病:我们做到了吗?

Avicenna Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1808060
Florin Scarlatescu, Ecaterina Scarlatescu, Dana R Tomescu, Daniela Bartos
{"title":"使用生物标志物诊断败血症相关脑病:我们做到了吗?","authors":"Florin Scarlatescu, Ecaterina Scarlatescu, Dana R Tomescu, Daniela Bartos","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1808060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a diffuse brain dysfunction that occurs in patients with sepsis in the absence of direct central nervous system infection or other causes of encephalopathy. SAE is common, occurring in up to 70% of patients with sepsis, and is linked to various clinical manifestations and significantly poorer outcomes. The diagnosis of SAE usually relies on clinical examination, which is often difficult due to confounding factors in critically ill patients. Other diagnostic tools used include electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and biomarkers. We performed a systematic search and review to synthesize all available evidence on biomarkers used for SAE diagnosis in clinical practice and highlight future directions for research. The literature search in MEDLINE identified 18 eligible studies. Biomarkers reflecting inflammation, endothelial activation and damage, astrocytic and microglial activation, neuronal injury, and metabolism changes were described, demonstrating their usefulness and potential in diagnosing and evaluating SAE. However, among different studies, the reported sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers for diagnosing SAE varied based on the populations studied and the cutoff levels considered for each biomarker. In conclusion, biomarkers may be useful for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in SAE, but their usefulness in clinical practice remains limited for the moment. More research is needed to identify biomarkers that can improve SAE diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"51-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagnosis of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Using Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?\",\"authors\":\"Florin Scarlatescu, Ecaterina Scarlatescu, Dana R Tomescu, Daniela Bartos\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1808060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a diffuse brain dysfunction that occurs in patients with sepsis in the absence of direct central nervous system infection or other causes of encephalopathy. SAE is common, occurring in up to 70% of patients with sepsis, and is linked to various clinical manifestations and significantly poorer outcomes. The diagnosis of SAE usually relies on clinical examination, which is often difficult due to confounding factors in critically ill patients. Other diagnostic tools used include electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and biomarkers. We performed a systematic search and review to synthesize all available evidence on biomarkers used for SAE diagnosis in clinical practice and highlight future directions for research. The literature search in MEDLINE identified 18 eligible studies. Biomarkers reflecting inflammation, endothelial activation and damage, astrocytic and microglial activation, neuronal injury, and metabolism changes were described, demonstrating their usefulness and potential in diagnosing and evaluating SAE. However, among different studies, the reported sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers for diagnosing SAE varied based on the populations studied and the cutoff levels considered for each biomarker. In conclusion, biomarkers may be useful for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in SAE, but their usefulness in clinical practice remains limited for the moment. More research is needed to identify biomarkers that can improve SAE diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"51-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症相关脑病(SAE)是一种弥漫性脑功能障碍,发生在没有直接中枢神经系统感染或其他脑病原因的脓毒症患者中。SAE很常见,发生在高达70%的脓毒症患者中,并且与各种临床表现和明显较差的预后有关。SAE的诊断通常依赖于临床检查,但由于危重患者的混杂因素,临床检查往往很困难。使用的其他诊断工具包括脑电图、神经成像和生物标志物。我们进行了系统的搜索和综述,以综合临床实践中用于SAE诊断的生物标志物的所有可用证据,并强调了未来的研究方向。MEDLINE的文献检索确定了18项符合条件的研究。描述了反映炎症、内皮细胞激活和损伤、星形细胞和小胶质细胞激活、神经元损伤和代谢变化的生物标志物,证明了它们在诊断和评估SAE方面的有用性和潜力。然而,在不同的研究中,生物标志物诊断SAE的敏感性和特异性根据所研究的人群和每个生物标志物考虑的截止水平而变化。综上所述,生物标志物可能有助于SAE的诊断和预测结果,但目前它们在临床实践中的实用性仍然有限。需要更多的研究来确定可以提高SAE诊断的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Diagnosis of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Using Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?

The Diagnosis of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Using Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a diffuse brain dysfunction that occurs in patients with sepsis in the absence of direct central nervous system infection or other causes of encephalopathy. SAE is common, occurring in up to 70% of patients with sepsis, and is linked to various clinical manifestations and significantly poorer outcomes. The diagnosis of SAE usually relies on clinical examination, which is often difficult due to confounding factors in critically ill patients. Other diagnostic tools used include electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and biomarkers. We performed a systematic search and review to synthesize all available evidence on biomarkers used for SAE diagnosis in clinical practice and highlight future directions for research. The literature search in MEDLINE identified 18 eligible studies. Biomarkers reflecting inflammation, endothelial activation and damage, astrocytic and microglial activation, neuronal injury, and metabolism changes were described, demonstrating their usefulness and potential in diagnosing and evaluating SAE. However, among different studies, the reported sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers for diagnosing SAE varied based on the populations studied and the cutoff levels considered for each biomarker. In conclusion, biomarkers may be useful for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in SAE, but their usefulness in clinical practice remains limited for the moment. More research is needed to identify biomarkers that can improve SAE diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信