儿童心脏手术后增强恢复:一项荟萃分析。

Avicenna Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1808072
Osama Abu-Shawer, Abdel-Rahman E'mar, Abdel-Rahman Jaber, Shatha Tailakh, Amer Abu-Shawer, Caroline Al-Haddadin
{"title":"儿童心脏手术后增强恢复:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Osama Abu-Shawer, Abdel-Rahman E'mar, Abdel-Rahman Jaber, Shatha Tailakh, Amer Abu-Shawer, Caroline Al-Haddadin","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1808072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are a set of steps taken before, during, and after surgery to improve patient care and outcomes. While ERAS is well known for its benefits in various surgeries, its application in pediatric cardiac surgery is relatively new. With the recent emergence of studies on its implementation in pediatric cardiac surgery, this study is the first to systematically review the current evidence on the efficacy of ERAS in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases for comparative studies with control groups that described the use of ERAS in all types of pediatric cardiac surgeries from 2000 to 2024. The data collected included study design, patient demographics, elements of the ERAS protocols, and postoperative outcomes. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with the corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) for proportional and continuous variables, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies, involving 1,008 patients, were included in the final analysis: three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective cohort, and one case-control study. The ERAS protocols were applied in 430 (43%) patients, and standard perioperative care was applied in 578 (57%) patients. The analysis revealed that implementing the ERAS protocol significantly reduced ICU length of stay ( <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>  = 98.26%; MD = -1.441; 95% CI: -2.610 to -0.273; <i>p</i>  = 0.016). The ERAS group had a comparable rate of postoperative complications to the standard care group ( <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>  = 15.3%; OR: 0.889; 95% CI: 0.622-1.269; <i>p</i>  = 0.516).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ERAS protocols in pediatric cardiac surgery appear to be safe and effective in improving certain short-term outcomes. However, evidence is limited due to the small number of studies. Further multicenter RCTs that fully incorporate the ERAS protocol elements and assess both immediate and long-term outcomes are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"80-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Recovery after Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Osama Abu-Shawer, Abdel-Rahman E'mar, Abdel-Rahman Jaber, Shatha Tailakh, Amer Abu-Shawer, Caroline Al-Haddadin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1808072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are a set of steps taken before, during, and after surgery to improve patient care and outcomes. While ERAS is well known for its benefits in various surgeries, its application in pediatric cardiac surgery is relatively new. With the recent emergence of studies on its implementation in pediatric cardiac surgery, this study is the first to systematically review the current evidence on the efficacy of ERAS in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases for comparative studies with control groups that described the use of ERAS in all types of pediatric cardiac surgeries from 2000 to 2024. The data collected included study design, patient demographics, elements of the ERAS protocols, and postoperative outcomes. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with the corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) for proportional and continuous variables, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies, involving 1,008 patients, were included in the final analysis: three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective cohort, and one case-control study. The ERAS protocols were applied in 430 (43%) patients, and standard perioperative care was applied in 578 (57%) patients. The analysis revealed that implementing the ERAS protocol significantly reduced ICU length of stay ( <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>  = 98.26%; MD = -1.441; 95% CI: -2.610 to -0.273; <i>p</i>  = 0.016). The ERAS group had a comparable rate of postoperative complications to the standard care group ( <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>  = 15.3%; OR: 0.889; 95% CI: 0.622-1.269; <i>p</i>  = 0.516).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ERAS protocols in pediatric cardiac surgery appear to be safe and effective in improving certain short-term outcomes. However, evidence is limited due to the small number of studies. Further multicenter RCTs that fully incorporate the ERAS protocol elements and assess both immediate and long-term outcomes are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"80-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178667/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:加强术后恢复(ERAS)协议是在手术前、手术中和手术后采取的一系列措施,以改善患者的护理和预后。虽然ERAS因其在各种手术中的益处而闻名,但其在儿科心脏手术中的应用相对较新。随着近年来在儿童心脏外科实施ERAS的研究的出现,本研究首次系统地回顾了ERAS在该领域疗效的现有证据。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行荟萃分析。两位审稿人独立检索了PubMed、Cochrane、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science、Embase和Scopus数据库,以比较2000年至2024年期间在所有类型的儿科心脏手术中使用ERAS的对照组研究。收集的数据包括研究设计、患者人口统计、ERAS方案的要素和术后结果。采用随机效应模型分别计算比例变量和连续变量的合并优势比(ORs)和平均差异(MDs)及其相应的置信区间(CIs)。结果:最终分析纳入5项研究,涉及1008例患者:3项随机对照试验(rct), 1项回顾性队列研究,1项病例对照研究。430例(43%)患者采用ERAS方案,578例(57%)患者采用标准围手术期护理。分析显示,实施ERAS方案可显著缩短ICU住院时间(I 2 = 98.26%;md = -1.441;95% CI: -2.610至-0.273;P = 0.016)。ERAS组的术后并发症发生率与标准护理组相当(I 2 = 15.3%;OR: 0.889;95% ci: 0.622-1.269;P = 0.516)。结论:儿童心脏手术ERAS方案在改善某些短期预后方面是安全有效的。然而,由于研究数量少,证据有限。需要进一步的多中心随机对照试验,充分纳入ERAS方案要素,并评估近期和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhanced Recovery after Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Enhanced Recovery after Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are a set of steps taken before, during, and after surgery to improve patient care and outcomes. While ERAS is well known for its benefits in various surgeries, its application in pediatric cardiac surgery is relatively new. With the recent emergence of studies on its implementation in pediatric cardiac surgery, this study is the first to systematically review the current evidence on the efficacy of ERAS in the field.

Methods: A meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two reviewers independently searched PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases for comparative studies with control groups that described the use of ERAS in all types of pediatric cardiac surgeries from 2000 to 2024. The data collected included study design, patient demographics, elements of the ERAS protocols, and postoperative outcomes. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with the corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) for proportional and continuous variables, respectively.

Results: Five studies, involving 1,008 patients, were included in the final analysis: three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective cohort, and one case-control study. The ERAS protocols were applied in 430 (43%) patients, and standard perioperative care was applied in 578 (57%) patients. The analysis revealed that implementing the ERAS protocol significantly reduced ICU length of stay ( I 2  = 98.26%; MD = -1.441; 95% CI: -2.610 to -0.273; p  = 0.016). The ERAS group had a comparable rate of postoperative complications to the standard care group ( I 2  = 15.3%; OR: 0.889; 95% CI: 0.622-1.269; p  = 0.516).

Conclusions: The ERAS protocols in pediatric cardiac surgery appear to be safe and effective in improving certain short-term outcomes. However, evidence is limited due to the small number of studies. Further multicenter RCTs that fully incorporate the ERAS protocol elements and assess both immediate and long-term outcomes are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信