兰斯-亚当斯综合征的治疗、诊断方法和长期预后。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Helena Xeros, Amra Sakusic, Jennifer E Fugate, Maximiliano A Hawkes, Eelco F M Wijdicks, Alejandro A Rabinstein, Sherri A Braksick
{"title":"兰斯-亚当斯综合征的治疗、诊断方法和长期预后。","authors":"Helena Xeros, Amra Sakusic, Jennifer E Fugate, Maximiliano A Hawkes, Eelco F M Wijdicks, Alejandro A Rabinstein, Sherri A Braksick","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02307-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lance-Adams syndrome (LAS) is a rare neurological complication following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients present with action myoclonus within days to months after awakening. There is no established first-line treatment. The objectives of this study were to describe treatments, diagnostic approaches, and long-term clinical outcomes for LAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients seen at three tertiary referral hospitals. An electronic database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with LAS from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2022. Demographics, diagnostics, treatments, and long-term clinical outcomes were extracted. Descriptive statistics were completed to summarize treatments, diagnostics, and clinical outcomes, which were assessed by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at 6 months. Symptom control was defined as minimal or no residual myoclonus causing functional impairment on activities of daily living.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 25 patients were diagnosed with LAS during the acute hospitalization after their cardiac arrest, and the rest were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The most common initial treatment was levetiracetam (n = 26; 67%) followed by valproic acid (n = 4; 10.3%). Most patients initially treated with levetiracetam (n = 22; 85%) or valproic acid (n = 4; 100%) had symptom improvement. Most patients (n = 28; 72%) required a second medication. The most common second-line agent was a benzodiazepine (n = 13; 48%). Thirty-three patients (85%) had improvement of the myoclonus over time. Thirty (77%) were able to achieve symptom control. The median time to achieve symptom control for patients diagnosed in the inpatient setting was 70 days. At the 6-month follow-up, 8 patients (23%) achieved a CPC score of 1, whereas 11 patients (30%) had a CPC score of 2. Thirteen patients (33%) attempted to wean off their medications, of which six patients (46%) were successful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with LAS experienced improvement of their myoclonus while being treated with levetiracetam, valproic acid, or benzodiazepines, although multiple medications and long-term treatment were often used. Half the patients attained favorable functional outcomes at 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment, Diagnostic Approach, and Long-Term Outcomes of Lance-Adams Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Helena Xeros, Amra Sakusic, Jennifer E Fugate, Maximiliano A Hawkes, Eelco F M Wijdicks, Alejandro A Rabinstein, Sherri A Braksick\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02307-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lance-Adams syndrome (LAS) is a rare neurological complication following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients present with action myoclonus within days to months after awakening. There is no established first-line treatment. The objectives of this study were to describe treatments, diagnostic approaches, and long-term clinical outcomes for LAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients seen at three tertiary referral hospitals. An electronic database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with LAS from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2022. Demographics, diagnostics, treatments, and long-term clinical outcomes were extracted. Descriptive statistics were completed to summarize treatments, diagnostics, and clinical outcomes, which were assessed by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at 6 months. Symptom control was defined as minimal or no residual myoclonus causing functional impairment on activities of daily living.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 25 patients were diagnosed with LAS during the acute hospitalization after their cardiac arrest, and the rest were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The most common initial treatment was levetiracetam (n = 26; 67%) followed by valproic acid (n = 4; 10.3%). Most patients initially treated with levetiracetam (n = 22; 85%) or valproic acid (n = 4; 100%) had symptom improvement. Most patients (n = 28; 72%) required a second medication. The most common second-line agent was a benzodiazepine (n = 13; 48%). Thirty-three patients (85%) had improvement of the myoclonus over time. Thirty (77%) were able to achieve symptom control. The median time to achieve symptom control for patients diagnosed in the inpatient setting was 70 days. At the 6-month follow-up, 8 patients (23%) achieved a CPC score of 1, whereas 11 patients (30%) had a CPC score of 2. Thirteen patients (33%) attempted to wean off their medications, of which six patients (46%) were successful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with LAS experienced improvement of their myoclonus while being treated with levetiracetam, valproic acid, or benzodiazepines, although multiple medications and long-term treatment were often used. Half the patients attained favorable functional outcomes at 6 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02307-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02307-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:兰斯-亚当斯综合征(LAS)是一种罕见的心肺复苏后神经系统并发症。患者在醒来后数天至数月内出现运动性肌阵挛。目前尚无确定的一线治疗方法。本研究的目的是描述LAS的治疗方法、诊断方法和长期临床结果。方法:我们对在三家三级转诊医院就诊的患者进行回顾性分析。电子数据库用于识别2010年1月1日至2022年6月30日诊断为LAS的所有患者。提取了人口统计学、诊断、治疗和长期临床结果。对治疗、诊断和临床结果进行描述性统计,6个月时采用脑功能分类(CPC)评估。症状控制被定义为轻微或没有残留的肌阵挛导致日常生活活动的功能障碍。结果:39例患者符合纳入标准。共有25例患者在心脏骤停后的急性住院期间被诊断为LAS,其余患者在门诊被诊断。最常见的初始治疗是左乙拉西坦(n = 26;67%),其次是丙戊酸(n = 4;10.3%)。大多数患者最初使用左乙拉西坦治疗(n = 22;85%)或丙戊酸(n = 4;100%)症状改善。大多数患者(n = 28;72%)需要第二种药物。最常见的二线药物是苯二氮卓类药物(n = 13;48%)。随着时间的推移,33例(85%)患者的肌阵挛有所改善。30例(77%)患者症状得到控制。在住院环境中诊断的患者实现症状控制的中位时间为70天。在6个月的随访中,8名患者(23%)的CPC评分为1分,而11名患者(30%)的CPC评分为2分。13名患者(33%)试图戒断药物,其中6名患者(46%)成功。结论:大多数LAS患者在接受左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸或苯二氮卓类药物治疗后,肌阵挛得到改善,尽管经常使用多种药物和长期治疗。一半的患者在6个月时获得了良好的功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment, Diagnostic Approach, and Long-Term Outcomes of Lance-Adams Syndrome.

Background: Lance-Adams syndrome (LAS) is a rare neurological complication following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients present with action myoclonus within days to months after awakening. There is no established first-line treatment. The objectives of this study were to describe treatments, diagnostic approaches, and long-term clinical outcomes for LAS.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients seen at three tertiary referral hospitals. An electronic database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with LAS from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2022. Demographics, diagnostics, treatments, and long-term clinical outcomes were extracted. Descriptive statistics were completed to summarize treatments, diagnostics, and clinical outcomes, which were assessed by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at 6 months. Symptom control was defined as minimal or no residual myoclonus causing functional impairment on activities of daily living.

Results: Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 25 patients were diagnosed with LAS during the acute hospitalization after their cardiac arrest, and the rest were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The most common initial treatment was levetiracetam (n = 26; 67%) followed by valproic acid (n = 4; 10.3%). Most patients initially treated with levetiracetam (n = 22; 85%) or valproic acid (n = 4; 100%) had symptom improvement. Most patients (n = 28; 72%) required a second medication. The most common second-line agent was a benzodiazepine (n = 13; 48%). Thirty-three patients (85%) had improvement of the myoclonus over time. Thirty (77%) were able to achieve symptom control. The median time to achieve symptom control for patients diagnosed in the inpatient setting was 70 days. At the 6-month follow-up, 8 patients (23%) achieved a CPC score of 1, whereas 11 patients (30%) had a CPC score of 2. Thirteen patients (33%) attempted to wean off their medications, of which six patients (46%) were successful.

Conclusions: Most patients with LAS experienced improvement of their myoclonus while being treated with levetiracetam, valproic acid, or benzodiazepines, although multiple medications and long-term treatment were often used. Half the patients attained favorable functional outcomes at 6 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信